|
|
Post by Lewscher on Feb 28, 2010 3:58:28 GMT -5
do matells punks have the pepsi tat?
|
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Cinnamon! on Feb 28, 2010 3:59:29 GMT -5
No
|
|
Hartvict
Mid-Carder
An All Canadian, Canadian.
Joined on: Feb 21, 2010 3:46:55 GMT -5
Posts: 106 
|
Post by Hartvict on Feb 28, 2010 4:44:59 GMT -5
well no because that would be copyright
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on Feb 28, 2010 6:03:09 GMT -5
Nopes  |
|
stopmotionzero
Jobber
I Need This
Joined on: Dec 22, 2009 21:48:33 GMT -5
Posts: 35
|
Post by stopmotionzero on Mar 9, 2010 17:53:33 GMT -5
i wish it did but it's still a great pick-up
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Mar 9, 2010 18:10:06 GMT -5
I wish they would just put a red & blue ying yang. Close enough.
|
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Mar 9, 2010 18:29:16 GMT -5
They should invert the tattoo and put it on.  |
|
Billy F'N Shogunn
Main Eventer
Embargo spelled backwards is F'n ograbme
Joined on: Jul 17, 2007 18:27:13 GMT -5
Posts: 2,611
|
Post by Billy F'N Shogunn on Mar 9, 2010 18:31:21 GMT -5
nor do they have the Cobra or Spitfire tats on his other arm - as they are copyrighted too.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dude on Mar 9, 2010 18:45:56 GMT -5
nor do they have the Cobra or Spitfire tats on his other arm - as they are copyrighted too. more like free advertising. It's not like we're buying it specifically for those logos. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Mar 9, 2010 18:59:38 GMT -5
Pepsi should work in conjunction with WWE and make a Pepsi Exclusive Punk.
|
|
beefpuppet
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 6, 2007 20:14:45 GMT -5
Posts: 1,855
|
Post by beefpuppet on Mar 9, 2010 19:14:05 GMT -5
Pepsi should work in conjunction with WWE and make a Pepsi Exclusive Punk. now that is a genius suggestion! |
|
|
|
Post by sting321 on Mar 9, 2010 20:19:17 GMT -5
w/e = cash goes
|
|
CrazyCale
Main Eventer
I ain't gonna be part of this system!
Joined on: May 8, 2009 17:46:28 GMT -5
Posts: 1,387
|
Post by CrazyCale on Mar 9, 2010 20:38:35 GMT -5
nor do they have the Cobra or Spitfire tats on his other arm - as they are copyrighted too. more like free advertising. It's not like we're buying it specifically for those logos. ;D what? you guys weren't? |
|
|
|
Post by Next Man’s Knowing Rock on Mar 10, 2010 5:37:51 GMT -5
nor do they have the Cobra or Spitfire tats on his other arm - as they are copyrighted too. more like free advertising. It's not like we're buying it specifically for those logos. ;D Considering the amount of threads on here that get made about Punk's tattoos, I'd say that might be an inaccurate statement. If a figure came out with the trademarked tats, there'd be all manner of "I'm buying it just for the tattoos!" fanboygasms going on. |
|
|
|
Post by sting321 on Mar 10, 2010 10:24:57 GMT -5
yeah i would totaly buy a cm punk just for a pepsi logo ...lol
|
|
Billy F'N Shogunn
Main Eventer
Embargo spelled backwards is F'n ograbme
Joined on: Jul 17, 2007 18:27:13 GMT -5
Posts: 2,611
|
Post by Billy F'N Shogunn on Mar 10, 2010 10:28:53 GMT -5
i like putting them on there myself, and besides, i wouldn't be surprised if a punk fig would cost more if he did have the copyright tats.
and anyone who paid money for a sticker, tshirt or hat with a logo on it (whether it's a brand-name, shoe company or energy drink related) paid the company to advertise for them. it's like going to work and paying your boss. (i'm guilty of it too)
|
|
weizie
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Jan 2, 2010 9:09:03 GMT -5
Posts: 257
|
Post by weizie on Mar 10, 2010 11:33:06 GMT -5
Well Pepsi tat or not I still haven't bought a cm punk and probably wont. But when it comes to his tattoos, they should be on the toy. They are on his body, and the art work of his various tattoo artist. So technically they are owned by punk, and pepsi can't say anything. And if they do punk should flip it and get money out of them for all the advertisement they get from him every week.
|
|
Jay "The Brain" Mann [OFSU]
Main Eventer
Holy crap, it's been OVER ten years since I joined?
Joined on: Jun 17, 2009 16:39:05 GMT -5
Posts: 3,855
|
Post by Jay "The Brain" Mann [OFSU] on Mar 10, 2010 17:30:06 GMT -5
How about Hasbro and Pepsi group together with Mattel for one perfect CM Punk figure?
|
|
|
|
Post by mrmad426 on Mar 10, 2010 18:36:50 GMT -5
Well Pepsi tat or not I still haven't bought a cm punk and probably wont. But when it comes to his tattoos, they should be on the toy. They are on his body, and the art work of his various tattoo artist. So technically they are owned by punk, and pepsi can't say anything. And if they do punk should flip it and get money out of them for all the advertisement they get from him every week. Technically not. Its still copyright infringement if Mattel puts the pepsi logo on Punk without permission. Pepsi would be in the right to sue. |
|
weizie
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Jan 2, 2010 9:09:03 GMT -5
Posts: 257
|
Post by weizie on Mar 10, 2010 21:49:44 GMT -5
Well Pepsi tat or not I still haven't bought a cm punk and probably wont. But when it comes to his tattoos, they should be on the toy. They are on his body, and the art work of his various tattoo artist. So technically they are owned by punk, and pepsi can't say anything. And if they do punk should flip it and get money out of them for all the advertisement they get from him every week. Technically not. Its still copyright infringement if Mattel puts the pepsi logo on Punk without permission. Pepsi would be in the right to sue. If you say so, I'm not a lawyer, I could be very wrong. But Pepsi would be stupid to complain.....but in all actuality couldn't all the tattoo artists sue also because that's their work on all these figures? |
|
![Jay "The Brain" Mann [OFSU] Avatar](http://i.imgur.com/jYUw6Sw.gif)
