weizie
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Jan 2, 2010 9:09:03 GMT -5
Posts: 257
|
Post by weizie on Mar 12, 2010 23:18:46 GMT -5
mattel really out shines jacks
|
|
asesino extrema
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Oct 30, 2009 16:56:20 GMT -5
Posts: 336
|
Post by asesino extrema on Mar 13, 2010 0:24:10 GMT -5
I used to love jakks for certain figures but mattel is up to date in the style of the figure structure
|
|
|
|
Post by Ldeow on Mar 13, 2010 0:33:38 GMT -5
I still think Jakks > Mattel
|
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on Mar 13, 2010 1:46:14 GMT -5
I still think Jakks > Mattel I'd love to see a thread from you done in the fashion of this one, that substantiates that claim. |
|
|
|
Post by The Dude on Mar 13, 2010 3:23:46 GMT -5
I still think Jakks > Mattel I'd love to see a thread from you done in the fashion of this one, that substantiates that claim. same here |
|
|
|
Post by purplekangaroo on Mar 13, 2010 3:59:22 GMT -5
This and the other survey of yours is so slanted towards Mattel, it's disgraceful. Simply because it's based on your own preferences!
Eg. "Both bodies are also almost the same...but like the John Cena torso I think Mattel's is just better. "
I would do a comparision but don't have the time right now. I would, next week though.
Ciao
|
|
|
|
Post by D.B.K. on Mar 13, 2010 5:59:11 GMT -5
MATTEL wins all the way man
|
|
CMJ
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 5, 2009 13:32:36 GMT -5
Posts: 3,291
|
Post by CMJ on Mar 13, 2010 6:27:15 GMT -5
i love mattel and collect mattel and jacks but you think matel finaly is beter then jacks one wow omg...
|
|
|
|
Post by ahunter8056 on Mar 13, 2010 6:55:59 GMT -5
I like these topics you do, but you are just too biased e.g. "I personally prefer the red attire". Yes Mattel are better mostly but sometimes Jakks were better e.g. Finlay and you never have Jakks wining. You just gotta make Jakks win on the figures they did better.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Mar 13, 2010 8:52:01 GMT -5
I think Punks body and head are better on Jakks in the versions you've shown
|
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Mar 13, 2010 9:26:38 GMT -5
Much like the first i agree with some and disagree with some of your points. Appreciate the fresh point of view.
|
|
|
|
Post by Y3RP: LA MARAVILLA!!! on Mar 13, 2010 10:15:51 GMT -5
dont want no fights and such just saying..............but why dont u compare DA against Elite and Basics with RA. because i dont see why u compared a Elite CM Punk to a RA CM Punk......of course the Elite will win. reason why cause all the money u gotta pay for having it to be great figure!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Mar 13, 2010 10:34:28 GMT -5
You gave Jakks more credit than it deserved.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Silent Flute (joepetree) on Mar 13, 2010 10:58:47 GMT -5
Mattel 37 > Jakks 18
ROFL Jakks Sucks
|
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on Mar 13, 2010 10:59:20 GMT -5
dont want no fights and such just saying..............but why dont u compare DA against Elite and Basics with RA. because i dont see why u compared a Elite CM Punk to a RA CM Punk......of course the Elite will win. reason why cause all the money u gotta pay for having it to be great figure!!! A few weeks ago I did a Mattel vs. Jakks post on my blog, and compared the WM 23 Punk with the Elite - I picked that Punk, because the tattoos were in color, and I thought it flat out looked better than the one DA figure I had of him. In my opinion, the DA figures were always too jacked and goofy looking, similar articulation or not, RA just looked better. ...maybe SkullManiac has a similar opinion. |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Mar 13, 2010 11:26:46 GMT -5
I still think Jakks > Mattel Please explain. |
|
molightning
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Feb 2, 2010 2:02:44 GMT -5
Posts: 73
|
Post by molightning on Mar 13, 2010 13:06:49 GMT -5
I think Mattel would win/is going to win most side-by-side battles against Jakks, but there are a few where Jakks could probably win. The only one I can think off off-hand would be this one..  While not the best picture, I do think Jakks made a better Big Show. Possibly Carlito as well, but I don't have him to compare. |
|
|
|
Post by 1992 on Mar 13, 2010 14:34:16 GMT -5
This and the other survey of yours is so slanted towards Mattel, it's disgraceful. Simply because it's based on your own preferences! Eg. "Both bodies are also almost the same...but like the John Cena torso I think Mattel's is just better. " I would do a comparision but don't have the time right now. I would, next week though. Ciao I'm so sick of seeing people toss around "in MY opinion..." on here thinking that is a way to dilute facts. Well, in my opinion, I think that my 1982 Toyota Pickup that I've been driving for the last 11 years and haven't really bothered to work on other than the occasional oil change runs TEN times smoother and is twice as fast as a 2010 Chevy Silverado. I mean at least in my opinion... See what I did there? Compared the the work Mattel does, Jakks are OBSOLETE. That is not an opinion, it's fact. At one point in time that Toyota Pickup was the ****, the nicest truck in town, but since those glory days, something BETTER has come along,that trumps it in every way. Better paint job Better accessories Better equipped for a new generation Is the Silverado flawless? Not by any means, but it's certainly better than than previous.    Take a look. I'm not "being a biased Mattel fan" by picking the best of Mattel and the worst of Jakks... Not at all. In fact the EG are one of Mattel's regular, mass produced series, the three Jakks counterparts are internet exclusives. Meaning that they should be much better, as Jakks only had to make a few thousand of each. "But...but the Jakks Shawn has....uhhh, he's uhhh...WELL LOOK AT THAT SCAN! See, MUCH BETTER THAN MATTEL!" No. Just let it go...it's over. And Jakks continues to sink lower with their shoddy work on the UFC line and no doubt the TNA line soon eventually. Facts > Opinions |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Mar 13, 2010 18:32:52 GMT -5
Pretty nice read but if you don't have a Beth fig to compare then at least get a pic and then do the points.
|
|
DKR
Main Eventer
It's all good...
Joined on: Feb 13, 2008 13:23:53 GMT -5
Posts: 3,916
|
Post by DKR on Mar 13, 2010 18:52:41 GMT -5
I don't want to quote the whole reply, but 1991 hit the nail on the head.
|
|
