|
|
Post by micco on Jul 29, 2010 3:50:55 GMT -5
I see your point. It would be insane to have Zeus in a package with the word legend written on it.
|
|
x
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 2, 2007 11:10:15 GMT -5
Posts: 2,721
|
Post by x on Jul 29, 2010 6:23:38 GMT -5
You're taking it far too literal.
It's like "WWE Superstars". They aren't "Superstars". They're "Wrestlers" It's just a phrase that WWE can copyright and claim intellectual property over, as well as present everything that isn't the current day product as a brand/product.
I like the name. It'll do.
|
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Jul 29, 2010 6:42:27 GMT -5
It's could have, not could of...
|
|
|
|
Post by LLD on Jul 29, 2010 7:09:27 GMT -5
Classic Superstars sounds better but as long as Mattel continues to make cool "legend" figures, I don't care what they call them.
|
|
10
Superstar
Joined on: May 18, 2009 18:36:54 GMT -5
Posts: 619
|
Post by 10 on Jul 29, 2010 9:42:13 GMT -5
I mite contact WWE and ask them how they class old school wrestlers. Will throw out the names Butch and Luke from the Bushwhackers as they are going to be series 1 of the Legends 2 packs.
Either way, its too late now. The series has been named and it would be a shame to change it now.
Umm..... anyone got Vince's email address? ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Lewscher on Jul 29, 2010 11:43:50 GMT -5
as much as i agree,........... GANGRELS BEING MADE!!!  ?? |
|
|
|
Post by Calcifer Boheme on Jul 29, 2010 17:18:10 GMT -5
People complaining are taking the term too seriously.
it is a marketing term, nothing more.
I for one like the name and can't think of anyone they would possibly make that I would be against them putting in it. It fits the WWE Legends brand and makes good marketing sense.
Not to mention that they've done a great job so far.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 13, 2024 18:01:59 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2010 18:28:58 GMT -5
HEY!!! The Headbangers are friggin' legends!
|
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Jul 29, 2010 19:39:55 GMT -5
should HAVE*
|
|
