|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Aug 3, 2010 15:25:23 GMT -5
I kind of missed the boat on the whole "The Crow" craze in the late 90's, so I went back and watched the acutal movie. I'm wondering if any sort of lawsuit has ever been brought to WCW or Sting because of it. If not, then why? Has ther ever been any legal dispute over it at all?
I mean his makeover was practically identical to the main character in the movie. Just wondering.
|
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Aug 3, 2010 15:36:47 GMT -5
I remember an old issue of Wizard saying that WCW had permission to use the Crow's image because Time-Warner owned both WCW and New Line Cinema, which made the Crow.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 29, 2024 17:40:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2010 17:57:51 GMT -5
I remember an old issue of Wizard saying that WCW had permission to use the Crow's image because Time-Warner owned both WCW and New Line Cinema, which made the Crow. it is something along those lines for sure......cant remember exactly but wasnt a deal reached with James O Barr the creator of the Crow to avoid any "legal who ha" later on?Scott Hall (whose idea this was)knew O Barr too so ya never know.O Barr was said to be a fan of the gimmick |
|
