|
Post by Kliquid on Aug 12, 2010 15:28:12 GMT -5
Did I say somewhere that you did...? Did I say that I believe the words " I make it rain on them hoes" has some hidden meaning? You posted the video and blasted me for "obviously not watching the video" where they basically act like saying the word "rain" is some cryptic message about a secret society.
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Aug 12, 2010 15:29:07 GMT -5
I'm still looking for the Michael Jackson song that talks about the Illuminati. Can anyone at all post that?
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Aug 12, 2010 15:35:41 GMT -5
Did I say that I believe the words " I make it rain on them hoes" has some hidden meaning? You posted the video and blasted me for "obviously not watching the video" where they basically act like saying the word "rain" is some cryptic message about a secret society. No I " blasted " you because you stated opinions before actually watching all the videos, which you've just said you still haven't and won't do.. So basically you are just talking away without watching any of the videos for yourself. I'm still looking for the Michael Jackson song that talks about the Illuminati. Can anyone at all post that? You've been waiting all this time for lyrics, when you could have just watched the videos..
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Aug 12, 2010 15:39:35 GMT -5
I've invited you numerous times to post something of actual substance, which you have failed to do.
I'm not going to spend 90 minutes watching videos that are like the first ten minutes.
It took me less than ten minutes to realize how intellectually- disabled the video was because the first ten minutes were riddled with incorrect "facts," which myself and others have pointed out.
If I make a 6-hour long video of me babbling incoherently about why Mike Vick is the greatest NFL quarterback of all-time, while saying "He's thrown for 200,000 yards and 1 million touchdowns," that completely negates my own argument. My facts would be incorrect, and thus the entire basis of my video would be out the window. No one should spend 6 hours watching my video because it's obviously terribly researched, has no factual information, and anyone who would spend 6 hours watching it should probably find something better to do with their time.
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Aug 12, 2010 15:47:20 GMT -5
I'm still looking for the Michael Jackson song that talks about the Illuminati. Can anyone at all post that? You've been waiting all this time for lyrics, when you could have just watched the videos.. No. I'm out of my mom's basement working for a living.
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Aug 12, 2010 15:53:38 GMT -5
You've been waiting all this time for lyrics, when you could have just watched the videos.. No. I'm out of my mom's basement working for a living. Living alone with a dog that you can't name yourself... .... Anyways.. Kliq.. If you fail to understand that you're stating opinions on an hour long video while watching less than 10 mins of it, that's not my problem. The videos have several thousands that have liked it, and few hundreds who don't.
|
|
|
Post by Word™ on Aug 12, 2010 15:56:09 GMT -5
You fail.
|
|
|
Post by Mole on Aug 12, 2010 16:02:48 GMT -5
Anyways.. Kliq.. If you fail to understand that you're stating opinions on an hour long video while watching less than 10 mins of it, that's not my problem. The videos have several thousands that have liked it, and few hundreds who don't. Ok, I lied before. Here's the thing, though: the video does not change much. If you already know it's bs after watching 10 minutes, you don't need to watch the rest, because you already know it's bs.
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Aug 12, 2010 16:13:12 GMT -5
Here's the thing, though: the video does not change much. If you already know it's bs after watching 10 minutes, you don't need to watch the rest, because you already know it's bs. This. If you actually read my post, you'd see why I'm not going to spend 90 minutes watching this stupid horseshit. Again, if I make a 6-hour long video filled with incorrect "facts," I wouldn't expect people to watch it, either.
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Aug 12, 2010 16:51:10 GMT -5
Here's the thing, though: the video does not change much. If you already know it's bs after watching 10 minutes, you don't need to watch the rest, because you already know it's bs. This. If you actually read my post, you'd see why I'm not going to spend 90 minutes watching this stupid horsepoop. Again, if I make a 6-hour long video filled with incorrect "facts," I wouldn't expect people to watch it, either. But that's the thing.. You don't know that it's filled with incorrect facts because you watched only less than 10 mins of it. The video makes good points.
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Aug 12, 2010 17:00:16 GMT -5
I almost want to finish watching it, because part 1 and 2 are hilarious.
|
|
|
Post by Mole on Aug 12, 2010 17:04:38 GMT -5
This. If you actually read my post, you'd see why I'm not going to spend 90 minutes watching this stupid horsepoop. Again, if I make a 6-hour long video filled with incorrect "facts," I wouldn't expect people to watch it, either. But that's the thing.. You don't know that it's filled with incorrect facts because you watched only less than 10 mins of it. The video makes good points. I know it's filled with incorrect (or at least completely unsupported) facts.
|
|
|
Post by The Champ is Here! on Aug 12, 2010 17:04:47 GMT -5
This. If you actually read my post, you'd see why I'm not going to spend 90 minutes watching this stupid horsepoop. Again, if I make a 6-hour long video filled with incorrect "facts," I wouldn't expect people to watch it, either. But that's the thing.. You don't know that it's filled with incorrect facts because you watched only less than 10 mins of it. The video makes good points. but it doesn't matter what it says in the others, they have nothing to stand on because so many of the facts in the first video are wrong! If those are wrong, how do i know when they get something right? i won't, because their history is that they are wrong!
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Aug 12, 2010 17:07:47 GMT -5
That's your opinion that the facts are wrong.. There are 10,000 other people that disagree if you take all the thumbs up the videos get. Simple thing is, he's gave good facts, you people are judging the videos based on me who posted it and not on the facts provided. If you can't watch the video and understand what he's talking about and see the facts.. that's not my problem.
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Aug 12, 2010 17:10:22 GMT -5
"The men are shown a room full of women, and told they may choose any one of them to take home. However, these women are under heavy mind control, but of course the artist does not know this."
L
O
L
|
|
|
Post by The Champ is Here! on Aug 12, 2010 17:10:28 GMT -5
and 10,000 people disagreeing with will change my opinion how?
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Aug 12, 2010 17:11:11 GMT -5
But that's the thing.. You don't know that it's filled with incorrect facts because you watched only less than 10 mins of it. The video makes good points. Then (for the 4th time now), please post one of its "Good points," because the parts you've posted have been absolutely ridiculous. Someone referencing the movie "Rain Man" (clearly talking about Dustin Hoffman's character) does not prove a god damn thing.
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Aug 12, 2010 17:13:01 GMT -5
"Artists are made to believe that Satan is worthy of worship, and God is not."
"Rain Man is a devil."
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Aug 12, 2010 17:14:57 GMT -5
"Some people believe that some artists are possesed by the Rain Man"
Ok, seriously, is this just a fancy way to tell me that "Rock and Roll is the devils music?"
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Aug 12, 2010 17:15:27 GMT -5
What baffles me is that Oskanowski doesn't believe in religion, but he DOES believe in this shit.
|
|