|
Post by sgptripleh on Aug 25, 2010 1:06:51 GMT -5
i support this
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Aug 25, 2010 7:08:29 GMT -5
You know if the Tea Party were true to it's ideals, then Ron Paul would be the Republican nominee for President in 2012. I'd actually like to see an Obama/Paul debate. Nope, more likely they'd rather have Sarah Palin.
|
|
|
Post by Mole on Aug 25, 2010 7:38:06 GMT -5
You know if the Tea Party were true to it's ideals, then Ron Paul would be the Republican nominee for President in 2012. I'd actually like to see an Obama/Paul debate. Nope, more likely they'd rather have Sarah Palin. Which means that they aren't true to their ideals. They act as though they're libertarians, and Sarah Palin is not a libertarian.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Show on Aug 25, 2010 13:29:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Aug 25, 2010 13:30:27 GMT -5
Nope, more likely they'd rather have Sarah Palin. Which means that they aren't true to their ideals. They act as though they're libertarians, and Sarah Palin is not a libertarian. They're not libertarians. They're basically the right wing of the Republican party.
|
|
|
Post by Mole on Aug 25, 2010 14:38:02 GMT -5
Which means that they aren't true to their ideals. They act as though they're libertarians, and Sarah Palin is not a libertarian. They're not libertarians. They're basically the right wing of the Republican party. What they pretend to be and what they are, are two different things.
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Aug 25, 2010 18:05:21 GMT -5
Nope, more likely they'd rather have Sarah Palin. Which means that they aren't true to their ideals. They act as though they're libertarians, and Sarah Palin is not a libertarian. No, she most certainly is not. Neither are they.
|
|