|
|
Post by slappy on Oct 13, 2010 1:07:35 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:22:02 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2010 1:13:03 GMT -5
Well, mice and Homo Sapiens have very little in common, other than the fact that we are both mammals. I have a feeling that the equivalent to this gene in us is probably found "deactivated" in both intelligent and non-intelligent people, and found "activated" in intelligent and non-intelligent people. And besides, this is a controlled experiment, we don't know if it has the same effect on every single mouse or rodent in existence.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Oct 13, 2010 1:19:24 GMT -5
Well, mice and Homo Sapiens have very little in common, other than the fact that we are both mammals. I have a feeling that the equivalent to this gene in us is probably found "deactivated" in both intelligent and non-intelligent people, and found "activated" in intelligent and non-intelligent people. And besides, this is a controlled experiment, we don't know if it has the same effect on every single mouse or rodent in existence. Obviously you can't test every single mouse. If you needed everything of something to test then we'd never get any experiments done. |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Oct 13, 2010 5:52:49 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:22:02 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2010 7:52:00 GMT -5
Well, mice and Homo Sapiens have very little in common, other than the fact that we are both mammals. I have a feeling that the equivalent to this gene in us is probably found "deactivated" in both intelligent and non-intelligent people, and found "activated" in intelligent and non-intelligent people. And besides, this is a controlled experiment, we don't know if it has the same effect on every single mouse or rodent in existence. Obviously you can't test every single mouse. If you needed everything of something to test then we'd never get any experiments done. Okay, but we probably need more than they have tested. Has it been accepted 100% by the scientific community yet? |
|
Jack.
Main Eventer
Probably out Skating
Joined on: Feb 23, 2009 11:06:38 GMT -5
Posts: 4,907
|
Post by Jack. on Oct 13, 2010 9:51:40 GMT -5
My dad has always said he has the Homer Simpson gene but by that he means that everytime he had a child he lost more hair. He is now bald  |
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Oct 13, 2010 9:54:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Y3RP: LA MARAVILLA!!! on Oct 13, 2010 14:19:05 GMT -5
My dad has always said he has the Homer Simpson gene but by that he means that everytime he had a child he lost more hair. He is now bald does he says d'oh aswell!? cause my friend does almost everything homer does! |
|
|
|
Post by alexgg on Oct 13, 2010 14:21:06 GMT -5
I read this as Homer Simpson Game, I was wondering why scientists were making a game for...
Hasnt this 'gene' been around for a while though, ive heard this before.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Oct 13, 2010 15:57:13 GMT -5
Obviously you can't test every single mouse. If you needed everything of something to test then we'd never get any experiments done. Okay, but we probably need more than they have tested. Has it been accepted 100% by the scientific community yet? Nothing is every 100% accepted by the scientific community. |
|
