|
|
Post by slappy on Oct 22, 2010 19:55:04 GMT -5
"With Democrats increasingly outraged over the Supreme Court's Citizen United decision that allowed unlimited corporate spending in elections -- a change conservatives have been more successful at taking advantage of -- a Democratic congressman is raising the prospect of impeaching the Supreme Court's chief justice over the issue." www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/22/peter-defazio-impeachment-chief-justice-john-roberts_n_771431.htmllol, I think it would be hilarious to watch. Of course nothing will come of it, but it is still kind of funny. |
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Oct 22, 2010 19:57:56 GMT -5
It pisses me off any more when people talk about impeaching someone. It's never because they've done something illegal. It's always because they've done something that the person disagrees with politically. That's not what impeachment is for.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Oct 22, 2010 19:58:44 GMT -5
Earl Warren wasn't a stripper!
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Oct 22, 2010 20:01:03 GMT -5
Earl Warren wasn't a stripper! lol. Yes, Hulk, it always is. Like the billboards pushing for the impeachment of Obama. It is ridiculous. |
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Oct 22, 2010 21:19:51 GMT -5
How about removing the President instead?www.presstv.ir/detail/147724.html"Right now, there is discussion in Washington and within the government of using the 25th amendment to the US Constitution to remove Obama from office," Edward Spannaus from Executive Intelligence Review said in an interview with Press TV on Friday.
The amendment allows for removing the president if he/she has incapacity either physically or mentally.
"In this case, Obama is mentally incapable of fulfilling the office of president," Spannaus went on to say.
Referring to Obama's plummeting popularity, mostly due to the recent economic collapse in the US, Spannaus said, "There is no way that his presidency could be salvaged at this point and it does not really make any difference who wins the congressional elections."
"He was not qualified to be the president in the first place. He was put in there precisely because he would act as a puppet and they knew he would be a puppet for Wall Street, for the London financiers and for the British," Spannaus added.
A recent survey from Gallup has revealed that more than half of American voters would not support the incumbent US president's re-election.
A recent survey from Gallup has revealed that more than half of American voters would not support the re-election of President Barack Obama.hm..? 
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Oct 22, 2010 22:36:14 GMT -5
"A recent survey from Gallup has revealed that more than half of American voters would not support the incumbent US president's re-election.
A recent survey from Gallup has revealed that more than half of American voters would not support the re-election of President Barack Obama."
Why did they have to put that basically twice?
I'm calling bullcrapon it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Oct 22, 2010 22:39:19 GMT -5
I don't know why either. But, I figured, hey, if he's out of office soon, at least I know I posted it. lol.
|
|
Captain d00m - Mr. 3000
Main Eventer
Bringing death and destruction since 2005!
Joined on: Dec 2, 2005 20:52:43 GMT -5
Posts: 3,376
|
Post by Captain d00m - Mr. 3000 on Oct 22, 2010 23:05:02 GMT -5
How about removing the President instead?www.presstv.ir/detail/147724.html"Right now, there is discussion in Washington and within the government of using the 25th amendment to the US Constitution to remove Obama from office," Edward Spannaus from Executive Intelligence Review said in an interview with Press TV on Friday.
The amendment allows for removing the president if he/she has incapacity either physically or mentally.
"In this case, Obama is mentally incapable of fulfilling the office of president," Spannaus went on to say.
Referring to Obama's plummeting popularity, mostly due to the recent economic collapse in the US, Spannaus said, "There is no way that his presidency could be salvaged at this point and it does not really make any difference who wins the congressional elections."
"He was not qualified to be the president in the first place. He was put in there precisely because he would act as a puppet and they knew he would be a puppet for Wall Street, for the London financiers and for the British," Spannaus added.
A recent survey from Gallup has revealed that more than half of American voters would not support the incumbent US president's re-election.
A recent survey from Gallup has revealed that more than half of American voters would not support the re-election of President Barack Obama.hm..?  |
|
|
|
Post by "The Visionary" Eldniw on Oct 22, 2010 23:12:02 GMT -5
How about removing the President instead?www.presstv.ir/detail/147724.html"Right now, there is discussion in Washington and within the government of using the 25th amendment to the US Constitution to remove Obama from office," Edward Spannaus from Executive Intelligence Review said in an interview with Press TV on Friday.
The amendment allows for removing the president if he/she has incapacity either physically or mentally.
"In this case, Obama is mentally incapable of fulfilling the office of president," Spannaus went on to say.
Referring to Obama's plummeting popularity, mostly due to the recent economic collapse in the US, Spannaus said, "There is no way that his presidency could be salvaged at this point and it does not really make any difference who wins the congressional elections."
"He was not qualified to be the president in the first place. He was put in there precisely because he would act as a puppet and they knew he would be a puppet for Wall Street, for the London financiers and for the British," Spannaus added.
A recent survey from Gallup has revealed that more than half of American voters would not support the incumbent US president's re-election.
A recent survey from Gallup has revealed that more than half of American voters would not support the re-election of President Barack Obama.hm..? AH HAHAHA! So much win! |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Oct 22, 2010 23:14:22 GMT -5
How about removing the President instead?www.presstv.ir/detail/147724.html"Right now, there is discussion in Washington and within the government of using the 25th amendment to the US Constitution to remove Obama from office," Edward Spannaus from Executive Intelligence Review said in an interview with Press TV on Friday.
The amendment allows for removing the president if he/she has incapacity either physically or mentally.
"In this case, Obama is mentally incapable of fulfilling the office of president," Spannaus went on to say.
Referring to Obama's plummeting popularity, mostly due to the recent economic collapse in the US, Spannaus said, "There is no way that his presidency could be salvaged at this point and it does not really make any difference who wins the congressional elections."
"He was not qualified to be the president in the first place. He was put in there precisely because he would act as a puppet and they knew he would be a puppet for Wall Street, for the London financiers and for the British," Spannaus added.
A recent survey from Gallup has revealed that more than half of American voters would not support the incumbent US president's re-election.
A recent survey from Gallup has revealed that more than half of American voters would not support the re-election of President Barack Obama.hm..? If we couldn't impeach him for the craphe did, then no other President should be impeached. |
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Oct 22, 2010 23:16:09 GMT -5
If we couldn't impeach him for the **** he did, then no other President should be impeached.
Yeah, that's what I was reading. But then again, that could open up a whole new door of opinions which I'm not getting into UNLESS we see Obama out of office. |
|
