|
|
Post by SteveHulk on Mar 2, 2011 22:50:29 GMT -5
Round Three reminded me a lot of Round 2 of Forrest/Rampage, with Forrest in dominant position nearly the entire round. I can't remember off the top of my head if the judges scored that a 10-8, but I know there was an argument for one. My only concern is, if those are 10-8 rounds, then what the hell is Round 1 of Edgar/Maynard? Is that realllly a 10-7? Yeah, I think it probably was. The trouble is - you need some distinction in the scoring to show if a guy has been particularly dominant or scored a lot of knockdowns etc... I mean, some people scored the 2nd round (in the Penn/Fitch fight) for Fitch - so it seems unfair/wrong to score a round he "just nicked" and one where he totally dominated (the 3rd), the same (10-9).  |
|
Sandy
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: Dec 17, 2004 14:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 5,868
|
Post by Sandy on Mar 2, 2011 23:47:40 GMT -5
hard fight to call really. I think Penn won...but I am probably biased because I can't stand the human snuggie! With that being said I think that was one of the most entertaining fights I have ever seen Fitch in...
|
|
|
|
Post by liveanddielax on Mar 4, 2011 1:12:31 GMT -5
So who won penn or fitch
|
|
+nod+of+approval.gif)
