|
|
Post by LtD73 on Feb 9, 2011 11:14:13 GMT -5
F4WOnline.com is reporting that TNA officials are under the belief that Sting is very close to signing a deal to return to the company, even though his profile was removed from the TNA website as we reported last night.
At last word, Sting had NOT been contacted by WWE officials and there has apparently been no discussion between both sides concerning an appearance by Sting at WrestleMania.
|
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Feb 9, 2011 11:18:24 GMT -5
On F4WOnline radio, the same guy who reported that said that Sting being removed from the TNA roster page was also a sign that he is secretly talking to Vince or hasnt been returning TNA's calls, so take that for what it's worth.
|
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Feb 9, 2011 12:00:31 GMT -5
hmm, that kinda makes it null and void.
|
|
TheXtremisT
Main Eventer
10 Year Member
This is the way
Joined on: May 3, 2008 8:03:15 GMT -5
Posts: 3,951
|
Post by TheXtremisT on Feb 9, 2011 12:01:48 GMT -5
I still never believed it was Sting in those videos 21 02 11
I'd was crying out for a Sting - Taker dream match, but it's highly unlikely
|
|
DreamWarrior25
Mid-Carder
Welcome to Primetime!
Joined on: Dec 6, 2010 14:31:59 GMT -5
Posts: 287
|
Post by DreamWarrior25 on Feb 9, 2011 12:13:32 GMT -5
If are they are close to signing a deal with Sting again then why did they make it a point to take time to remove him from the TNA roster? Hmmm......
|
|
|
|
Post by No Brokeback on Feb 9, 2011 12:31:20 GMT -5
If it's him, it's him, if it's not it's not.
At this point, however...
I wouldn't be surprised if the next promo was just of Undertakers face, saying it was him all along. That he has a score to settle....
People would still insist it was Sting.
meh.
|
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Feb 9, 2011 13:05:59 GMT -5
The entire roster thing means nothing considering the same thing happened with Kevin Nash back in 2008. When Nash/TNA was negotiating a new deal, TNA removed him from the roster about a week before Bound for Glory, then he shows up at Bound for Glory and costs joe the belt.
Being on/being removed from a roster page doesn't mean anything. Daniels was on the roster page for almost a year after his release.
|
|
|
|
Post by duan on Feb 9, 2011 13:45:04 GMT -5
The entire roster thing means nothing considering the same thing happened with Kevin Nash back in 2008. When Nash/TNA was negotiating a new deal, TNA removed him from the roster about a week before Bound for Glory, then he shows up at Bound for Glory and costs joe the belt. Being on/being removed from a roster page doesn't mean anything. Daniels was on the roster page for almost a year after his release. i think this may be because whoever runs the TNA website is a bit too lazy. |
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Feb 9, 2011 13:50:25 GMT -5
The entire roster thing means nothing considering the same thing happened with Kevin Nash back in 2008. When Nash/TNA was negotiating a new deal, TNA removed him from the roster about a week before Bound for Glory, then he shows up at Bound for Glory and costs joe the belt. Being on/being removed from a roster page doesn't mean anything. Daniels was on the roster page for almost a year after his release. But what if Sting doesnt show up at the Impact tapings after Against All Odds?  |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Feb 9, 2011 13:59:09 GMT -5
The entire roster thing means nothing considering the same thing happened with Kevin Nash back in 2008. When Nash/TNA was negotiating a new deal, TNA removed him from the roster about a week before Bound for Glory, then he shows up at Bound for Glory and costs joe the belt. Being on/being removed from a roster page doesn't mean anything. Daniels was on the roster page for almost a year after his release. i think this may be because whoever runs the TNA website is a bit too lazy. Yeah, but that still doesn't detract from the fact Nash was removed and then reappeared a week later.  |
|
Stinger TNA
Main Eventer
"Support TNA"
Joined on: Mar 31, 2010 19:21:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,481
|
Post by Stinger TNA on Feb 10, 2011 9:21:43 GMT -5
swerve, thats what WWE wants you to think. He's going to come down from the rafters (even though Owen Hart died like that and WWE are still in law suits because of it) and fight off Nexus and help the Undertaker its very obvious.  |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan17: The Total Package on Feb 10, 2011 11:34:06 GMT -5
I'd like to see the Stinger end his career in TNA personally. Maybe I am the only one.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Feb 10, 2011 11:58:19 GMT -5
Mcmahon own TNA, i've been saying it for years now.
|
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Feb 10, 2011 12:58:42 GMT -5
Mcmahon own TNA, i've been saying it for years now. that...wouldn't make much sense. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 0:35:34 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2011 11:27:04 GMT -5
I'd like to see the Stinger end his career in TNA personally. Maybe I am the only one. you and I agree on many things man but not this......I want Sting to be finished with TNA.I thought he has looked bored there for years. if Im being honest I want him to sign with Vinnie and get a REAL DVD of his career done. |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan17: The Total Package on Feb 11, 2011 11:28:06 GMT -5
I'd like to see the Stinger end his career in TNA personally. Maybe I am the only one. you and I agree on many things man but not this......I want Sting to be finished with TNA.I thought he has looked bored there for years. if Im being honest I want him to sign with Vinnie and get a REAL DVD of his career done. In that aspect we DEFINITELY agree lol. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 0:35:34 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2011 11:33:14 GMT -5
you and I agree on many things man but not this......I want Sting to be finished with TNA.I thought he has looked bored there for years. if Im being honest I want him to sign with Vinnie and get a REAL DVD of his career done. In that aspect we DEFINITELY agree lol. it would be such a must.full docu and plenty of Matches we have NEVER seen on DVD.it would be greatness. |
|
|
|
Post by Manson's inverted cross on Feb 11, 2011 22:41:23 GMT -5
Sting will be coming to WWE and he will fight Undertaker at Wrestlemania in a First Blood match. Sunny will also be coming to WWE and she will manage Taker, and it will be a Striptease match. Taker will lose and be 18-1 after Sting does a Swantom bomb to the outside of the ring and crashes Taker through the barricade. Then Sunny strips down.
|
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Feb 11, 2011 22:44:41 GMT -5
i like how my swerve comment was deleted for no reason. What is this the pic fed board?
|
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Feb 11, 2011 23:28:29 GMT -5
I'd like to see the Stinger end his career in TNA personally. Maybe I am the only one. you and I agree on many things man but not this......I want Sting to be finished with TNA.I thought he has looked bored there for years. if Im being honest I want him to sign with Vinnie and get a REAL DVD of his career done. Sting doesnt have to sign with the WWE to get a DVD. They could release one without his participation like the one they did on Randy Savage or he could just do an interview and pick the matches he wants on the DVD (which Sting has said he is willing to do in the past). |
|
