|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2011 9:53:46 GMT -5
Just shake my head. *People* cant be anymore dumber. Chill. No name calling. |
|
|
|
Post by No Brokeback on Feb 10, 2011 9:59:11 GMT -5
..man, I don't even want to think of WWE version sting. When WWE can't do the NWO, Cruiserweights, The Invasion or Goldberg right.....then I don't even want to know what they'd do to Sting at the end of the day. All the WWE would to Sting, is nothing but good. His name is now known to PG crowd. People are talking about him again. It was a mistake that he didn't take that deal in 2002, because he would beeb great... He was just a little insecure of how they use him. I'm going to assume that they wouldn't have him come down from the rafters I'm going to assume he wouldn't be attacking people with bats anymore But who knows, even if they do that..I really don't have any faith in the WWE creative department to do good with anything WCW related. They even messed up the Rise and Fall of WCW DVD. I don't think they really mentioned anything about Sting vs The NWO era of things within it.  |
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2011 10:05:48 GMT -5
All the WWE would to Sting, is nothing but good. His name is now known to PG crowd. People are talking about him again. It was a mistake that he didn't take that deal in 2002, because he would beeb great... He was just a little insecure of how they use him. I'm going to assume that they wouldn't have him come down from the rafters I'm going to assume he wouldn't be attacking people with bats anymore But who knows, even if they do that..I really don't have any faith in the WWE creative department to do good with anything WCW related. They even messed up the Rise and Fall of WCW DVD. I don't think they really mentioned anything about Sting vs The NWO era of things within it.
Are you talking about back then at 2002, or now ? |
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 10, 2011 10:20:52 GMT -5
Question, if its not Sting, what on earth are you going to do with yourself YankeesForever?  And like I said before, its pretty much gone round that the video is for Undertaker, that's been CONFIRMED. Sting showing up would merely be a consequence of the reaction from fans. If he can get that sort of reaction without even being mentioned, then there would be money using him at Mania. Nothing more, nothing less. Its not some conspiracy, its not something hidden. Its like The Number 23. Just because you can find something there, doesn't mean its actually there. You can distort anything to make it fit anything. Lets see... rain.... trenchcoat... OMG RORSCHACH IS COMING TO WWE!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Feb 10, 2011 10:28:23 GMT -5
Just shake my head. *People* cant be anymore dumber. Chill. No name calling. I didnt call anyone a name. I said people. Quit being so defensive about everything. You need to switch to decaf. |
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2011 10:43:13 GMT -5
I didnt call anyone a name. I said people. Quit being so defensive about everything. You need to switch to decaf. Defensive ? How i've been getting bash around here...? But, anyways, i wanna discuss this with you. Why you feel right on your opinion. I wanna hear it. Just like i wanna hear everyones opinion  |
|
|
|
Post by cenanation400 on Feb 10, 2011 11:06:30 GMT -5
i just found out about the new video on facebook page and if it is sting why does he disappear like a ghost? or am i stupid the song sounds like country music too. sorry if off topic If it says "Sting" on the top, you're on the right one  Because, his character was suppose to be someone who was resurrected from the ground. Like Taker. Thats why these video are so mysteries, because both can be similar. i am the dumb one on here |
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Feb 10, 2011 11:08:20 GMT -5
I didnt call anyone a name. I said people. Quit being so defensive about everything. You need to switch to decaf. Defensive ? How i've been getting bash around here...? But, anyways, i wanna discuss this with you. Why you feel right on your opinion. I wanna hear it. Just like i wanna hear everyones opinion Go back and look at the locked thread. You dont want to hear anyones opinion. You dont want to hear logic or rational. Every time someone brought up legit reasons why it wasnt Sting you jumped down them telling them they were scared and afraid to admit it and that you knew it was Sting and blah blah blah. You're sad. You really are. You've obsessed your life for the past 2 weeks over this. Just sit back and watch and see what comes of it. If its Sting, fine, if its not, fine but seriously chill the F out. That's all I need to say on this because Im sure most people have the same exact opinion on the subject as I do. Just let it go. |
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2011 11:21:53 GMT -5
Defensive ? How i've been getting bash around here...? But, anyways, i wanna discuss this with you. Why you feel right on your opinion. I wanna hear it. Just like i wanna hear everyones opinion Go back and look at the locked thread. You dont want to hear anyones opinion. You dont want to hear logic or rational. Every time someone brought up legit reasons why it wasnt Sting you jumped down them telling them they were scared and afraid to admit it and that you knew it was Sting and blah blah blah. You're sad. You really are. You've obsessed your life for the past 2 weeks over this. Just sit back and watch and see what comes of it. If its Sting, fine, if its not, fine but seriously chill the F out. That's all I need to say on this because Im sure most people have the same exact opinion on the subject as I do. Just let it go. Why are you taking this so hard ? This is suppose to be fun for a wrestling fan. I love this. This is the best thing WWE has done in a while. No one is against you.. I should be be acting like you more by the way i've been treated on here. But i don't cause its all in fun. Everyone has different opinions. Thats the beauty of life. |
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2011 11:22:30 GMT -5
If it says "Sting" on the top, you're on the right one Because, his character was suppose to be someone who was resurrected from the ground. Like Taker. Thats why these video are so mysteries, because both can be similar. i am the dumb one on here No you are not! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Feb 10, 2011 11:24:49 GMT -5
Go back and look at the locked thread. You dont want to hear anyones opinion. You dont want to hear logic or rational. Every time someone brought up legit reasons why it wasnt Sting you jumped down them telling them they were scared and afraid to admit it and that you knew it was Sting and blah blah blah. You're sad. You really are. You've obsessed your life for the past 2 weeks over this. Just sit back and watch and see what comes of it. If its Sting, fine, if its not, fine but seriously chill the F out. That's all I need to say on this because Im sure most people have the same exact opinion on the subject as I do. Just let it go. Why are you taking this so hard ? This is suppose to be fun for a wrestling fan. I love this. This is the best thing WWE has done in a while. No one is against you.. I should be be acting like you more by the way i've been treated on here. But i don't cause its all in fun. Everyone has different opinions. Thats the beauty of life. There is nothing wrong with THINKING it is Sting, but you keep INSISTING that it is him with no proof whatsoever. There is a difference. |
|
|
|
Post by No Brokeback on Feb 10, 2011 11:24:56 GMT -5
I'm going to assume that they wouldn't have him come down from the rafters I'm going to assume he wouldn't be attacking people with bats anymore But who knows, even if they do that..I really don't have any faith in the WWE creative department to do good with anything WCW related. They even messed up the Rise and Fall of WCW DVD. I don't think they really mentioned anything about Sting vs The NWO era of things within it.
Are you talking about back then at 2002, or now ?Well, now..Vince can't even build his own stars properly . So, an important character, that he's never had in his company before, I doubt will be written properly. Anything could happen, but with their WCW record of things, I'm not getting my hopes up. |
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Feb 10, 2011 11:27:09 GMT -5
..man, I don't even want to think of WWE version sting. When WWE can't do the NWO, Cruiserweights, The Invasion or Goldberg right.....then I don't even want to know what they'd do to Sting at the end of the day. WTF How did they do that wrong....He came in at the top and stayed there the entire time....He had a one year contract and help the WHC he beat HHH which no one could do at the time and started with The Rock and ended with Brock and Austin... He was made to look like a complete idiot against the Rock and an even bigger one when Goldust put the wig on him. |
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2011 11:32:13 GMT -5
Are you talking about back then at 2002, or now ?Well, now..Vince can't even build his own stars properly . So, an important character, that he's never had in his company before, I doubt will be written properly. Anything could happen, but with their WCW record of things, I'm not getting my hopes up. I think Vince will let Sting be himself. I see Vince trusting him. |
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2011 11:34:55 GMT -5
Why are you taking this so hard ? This is suppose to be fun for a wrestling fan. I love this. This is the best thing WWE has done in a while. No one is against you.. I should be be acting like you more by the way i've been treated on here. But i don't cause its all in fun. Everyone has different opinions. Thats the beauty of life. There is nothing wrong with THINKING it is Sting, but you keep INSISTING that it is him with no proof whatsoever. There is a difference. The proof for Sting can be easily that they haven't even showed the mysteries figure's face. |
|
|
|
Post by No Brokeback on Feb 10, 2011 11:35:35 GMT -5
WTF How did they do that wrong....He came in at the top and stayed there the entire time....He had a one year contract and help the WHC he beat HHH which no one could do at the time and started with The Rock and ended with Brock and Austin... He was made to look like a complete idiot against the Rock and an even bigger one when Goldust put the wig on him. Also, just because someone has the title doesn't mean much if the story leading up to it doesn't feel important. |
|
|
|
Post by No Brokeback on Feb 10, 2011 11:37:44 GMT -5
There is nothing wrong with THINKING it is Sting, but you keep INSISTING that it is him with no proof whatsoever. There is a difference. The proof for Sting can be easily that they haven't even showed the mysteries figure's face. Just to give you more fuel to annoy people with. "Ain't no grave, gonna hold me down" fits the Crow character perfectly, at least from the comic book. (I don't care one way or the other, really) |
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Feb 10, 2011 11:38:14 GMT -5
This place suuuuuuucks
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2011 11:55:21 GMT -5
The proof for Sting can be easily that they haven't even showed the mysteries figure's face. Just to give you more fuel to annoy people with. "Ain't no grave, gonna hold me down" fits the Crow character perfectly, at least from the comic book. (I don't care one way or the other, really) Yea. Just seems to obvious how the WWE is shoving Undertaker down our throats so bad. |
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 10, 2011 13:00:21 GMT -5
Just to give you more fuel to annoy people with. "Ain't no grave, gonna hold me down" fits the Crow character perfectly, at least from the comic book. (I don't care one way or the other, really) Yea. Just seems to obvious how the WWE is shoving Undertaker down our throats so bad. That way when its not Sting or Papa Shango or Pee Wee Herman, but is Undertaker, you can't be disappointed because they can just go "Well, told you so!" |
|
