|
|
Post by LtD73 on Feb 9, 2011 11:15:43 GMT -5
F4WOnline.com is reporting that TNA officials are under the belief that Sting is very close to signing a deal to return to the company, even though his profile was removed from the TNA website as we reported last night.
At last word, Sting had NOT been contacted by WWE officials and there has apparently been no discussion between both sides concerning an appearance by Sting at WrestleMania.
----------------------------------------
This will probably be locked but its worth posting
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Feb 9, 2011 11:19:27 GMT -5
It's a work.
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 9, 2011 11:21:04 GMT -5
That was from yesterday.
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Feb 9, 2011 11:23:18 GMT -5
Yeah but it was a work yesterday too... |
|
|
|
Post by cjskittles4 on Feb 9, 2011 11:24:38 GMT -5
It better be a work... Sting does not need to rot in that shitstorm that is TNA
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 9, 2011 11:31:34 GMT -5
It better be a work... Sting does not need to rot in that poopstorm that is TNA Yup. Those WCW Starrcade DVD's aren't in TNA..... |
|
|
|
Post by thephenomenalone on Feb 9, 2011 11:41:43 GMT -5
I bet it's all part of work honestly
|
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Feb 9, 2011 12:08:22 GMT -5
What's the matter, is Wrestlemania going to suck without Sting?
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Feb 9, 2011 12:09:35 GMT -5
What's the matter, is Wrestlemania going to suck without Sting? Would WrestleMania be better with him? Exactly. |
|
Shikari Ferrari
Mid-Carder
October 14th o2 arena newcastle <3
Joined on: Aug 20, 2010 6:24:06 GMT -5
Posts: 392
|
Post by Shikari Ferrari on Feb 9, 2011 12:13:06 GMT -5
'tis a work.
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 9, 2011 12:28:11 GMT -5
What's the matter, is Wrestlemania going to suck without Sting? Well.. HBK and Undertaker made the last two WM's. And i don't know what bigger name can you get close to great as HBK.....OH! I know ! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Feb 9, 2011 12:30:19 GMT -5
I hope he doesn't sign with TNA again.
This is probably his only chance to get out but if he stays then whatever.
I am not even a fan but I know a lot of people are so it would be nice.
|
|
|
|
Post by chaz on Feb 9, 2011 12:33:07 GMT -5
It better be a work... Sting does not need to rot in that poopstorm that is TNA Yup. Those WCW Starrcade DVD's aren't in TNA.....  |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 0:25:42 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2011 12:51:28 GMT -5
In all honesty we need that one "Big Name match" each year. WM 26: Taker/Shawn, Hart/McMahon. WM 25: Taker/Shawn. WM 24 had Michaels/Flair and the list goes on.
I'm not saying WM won't be great without him but they need that big name match to sell it more.
|
|
|
|
Post by gordon on Feb 9, 2011 12:52:27 GMT -5
He wasn't?! Wow, I am shocked  |
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Feb 9, 2011 12:58:29 GMT -5
I dont understand the whole "we need sting so we can give dvds and blah blah blah". WWE right now could put out a life and times of Sting 5 disc collection and not have to sweat a thing. They own the footage. The only thing "off" is Sting wouldnt be there to do interviews. Its the exact same thing as the Savage DVD.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Feb 9, 2011 13:03:05 GMT -5
People here are so ridiculous. We have a message board full of people not old enough to have watched WCW, and the majority of people here don't watch TNA because they think it sucks.
So why exactly does everybody want Sting so bad? I've seen Sting in his prime, and I've seen Sting in TNA. Honestly, except for the importance of his character and the nostalgia factor.....STING IS NOT THAT GOOD ANY MORE.
Sting is not like Shawn Michaels who was tearing the house down and having the match of the year 3 years in a row before his retirement.
I have no desire of seeing slow, broken down Sting vs. Slow, broken down Undertaker. You have to realize that in their current physical conditions, this match on paper looks to be the most boring thing EVER. And I'm glad it's not happening.
Sting should just stay in TNA. He wouldn't come to WWE when he was still good and they wanted to push him. Why the hell would he come to WWE NOW to lose to The Undertaker? It makes no sense.
Sting will NEVER wrestle for WWE. When his career is all said and done, he may show up for a Hall of Fame induction like so many guys who are in who never wrestled for WWE or had one short unsuccessful stint there.....but he will NEVER wrestle for WWE. And honestly, it would tarnish his career to wrestle for WWE.
|
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Feb 9, 2011 13:24:15 GMT -5
People here are so ridiculous. We have a message board full of people not old enough to have watched WCW, and the majority of people here don't watch TNA because they think it sucks. So why exactly does everybody want Sting so bad? I've seen Sting in his prime, and I've seen Sting in TNA. Honestly, except for the importance of his character and the nostalgia factor.....STING IS NOT THAT GOOD ANY MORE. Sting is not like Shawn Michaels who was tearing the house down and having the match of the year 3 years in a row before his retirement. I have no desire of seeing slow, broken down Sting vs. Slow, broken down Undertaker. You have to realize that in their current physical conditions, this match on paper looks to be the most boring thing EVER. And I'm glad it's not happening. Sting should just stay in TNA. He wouldn't come to WWE when he was still good and they wanted to push him. Why the hell would he come to WWE NOW to lose to The Undertaker? It makes no sense. Sting will NEVER wrestle for WWE. When his career is all said and done, he may show up for a Hall of Fame induction like so many guys who are in who never wrestled for WWE or had one short unsuccessful stint there.....but he will NEVER wrestle for WWE. And honestly, it would tarnish his career to wrestle for WWE. I dont get it either. Sting headlined a TNA PPV just over the summer with RVD that drew like 20,000 buys and now all of a sudden, everybody wants to see him and the WWE needs him for a big Wrestlemania match/buyrate? Sting has said that his shoulder has been bothering him for a while and doesnt want to wrestle if he doesnt feel 100%. |
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 9, 2011 13:28:17 GMT -5
People here are so ridiculous. We have a message board full of people not old enough to have watched WCW, and the majority of people here don't watch TNA because they think it sucks. So why exactly does everybody want Sting so bad? I've seen Sting in his prime, and I've seen Sting in TNA. Honestly, except for the importance of his character and the nostalgia factor.....STING IS NOT THAT GOOD ANY MORE. Sting is not like Shawn Michaels who was tearing the house down and having the match of the year 3 years in a row before his retirement. I have no desire of seeing slow, broken down Sting vs. Slow, broken down Undertaker. You have to realize that in their current physical conditions, this match on paper looks to be the most boring thing EVER. And I'm glad it's not happening. Sting should just stay in TNA. He wouldn't come to WWE when he was still good and they wanted to push him. Why the hell would he come to WWE NOW to lose to The Undertaker? It makes no sense. Sting will NEVER wrestle for WWE. When his career is all said and done, he may show up for a Hall of Fame induction like so many guys who are in who never wrestled for WWE or had one short unsuccessful stint there.....but he will NEVER wrestle for WWE. And honestly, it would tarnish his career to wrestle for WWE. I dont get it either. Sting headlined a TNA PPV just over the summer with RVD that drew like 20,000 buys and now all of a sudden, everybody wants to see him and the WWE needs him for a big Wrestlemania match/buyrate? Sting has said that his shoulder has been bothering him for a while and doesnt want to wrestle if he doesnt feel 100%. Well, Sting in TNA = Wheres Sting now these days ? Sting in WWE = Sting vs Undertaker ?!!?! HOLY crap! |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Feb 9, 2011 13:49:03 GMT -5
I bet he's gonna turn out to be the RAW GM.
|
|
