|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 10, 2011 14:55:41 GMT -5
As if any more proof was needed that this has nothing to do with Sting, WWE's Hulu page has this 2.21.11 video posted with the label "He's Coming Back". You can't come back if you've never been in the WWE before. Yea. Like the creative team is dumbbbbb. You don't think they knew that everyone knew it was Sting...? Even ppl on this board thought, it was Sting. Why would they put videos like these leading to WM. You think the WWE is that heartless...? And yea, its gonna be the Undertaker. For his 100th return with his GREATEST GIMMICK HE'S EVER HAD............ Like they don't know what we want..? How are they heartless? |
|
|
|
Post by chaz on Feb 10, 2011 14:59:55 GMT -5
As if any more proof was needed that this has nothing to do with Sting, WWE's Hulu page has this 2.21.11 video posted with the label "He's Coming Back". You can't come back if you've never been in the WWE before. Yea. Like the creative team is dumbbbbb. You don't think they knew that everyone knew it was Sting...? Even ppl on this board thought, it was Sting. Why would they put videos like these leading to WM. You think the WWE is that heartless...? And yea, its gonna be the Undertaker. For his 100th return with his GREATEST GIMMICK HE'S EVER HAD............ Like they don't know what we want..? So you're actually blaming WWE's creative team for your ricockulous theories being completely wrong? I can see it now.. 'OMGZ! yankees4eva from teh wf wants da man called stong, but we wont do it, coz we r heartless!' *high fives all around* |
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Feb 10, 2011 15:01:19 GMT -5
I'm still confused on how these videos are leading up to WM, when they are clearly leading up to 2.21.11. And as for what the fans what, I want Undertaker, not Sting.
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2011 15:02:47 GMT -5
Yea. Like the creative team is dumbbbbb. You don't think they knew that everyone knew it was Sting...? Even ppl on this board thought, it was Sting. Why would they put videos like these leading to WM. You think the WWE is that heartless...? And yea, its gonna be the Undertaker. For his 100th return with his GREATEST GIMMICK HE'S EVER HAD............ Like they don't know what we want..? So you're actually blaming WWE's creative team for your ricockulous theories being completely wrong? I can see it now.. 'OMGZ! yankees4eva from teh wf wants da man called stong, but we wont do it, coz we r heartless!' *high fives all around* Smh. Thats you guys! I'm talking about you guys. Because you guys think the WWE is break your heart. Cause nobody here wants JUST another Undertaker return and that be all. |
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2011 15:04:48 GMT -5
I'm still confused on how these videos are leading up to WM, when they are clearly leading up to 2.21.11. And as for what the fans what, I want Undertaker, not Sting. .....well...i think....they ..are..idk. Way i think. I guess. Well no matter what, you're gonna get Undertaker because we alllll know he will comeback. |
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 10, 2011 15:07:06 GMT -5
I'm still confused on how these videos are leading up to WM, when they are clearly leading up to 2.21.11. And as for what the fans what, I want Undertaker, not Sting. .....well...i think....they ..are..idk. Way i think. I guess. Well no matter what, you're gonna get Undertaker because we alllll know he will. Yup, which is why we're all confused as to why you're arguing this  |
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2011 15:10:15 GMT -5
.....well...i think....they ..are..idk. Way i think. I guess. Well no matter what, you're gonna get Undertaker because we alllll know he will. Yup, which is why we're all confused as to why you're arguing this Not arguing. Just saying ppl think Sting....is out of the question... have you been keeping up? |
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 10, 2011 15:12:16 GMT -5
Yup, which is why we're all confused as to why you're arguing this Not arguing. Just saying ppl think Sting....is out of the question... have you been keeping up? ... *throws hands in air* You talking about invisible baseball bats is a lot different than countering people who think Sting has zero chance of showing up. |
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2011 15:13:35 GMT -5
Not arguing. Just saying ppl think Sting....is out of the question... have you been keeping up? ... *throws hands in air* You talking about invisible baseball bats is a lot different than countering people who think Sting has zero chance of showing up. ?.......Yea, you're lost, loll. Sorry buddy. |
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 10, 2011 15:16:06 GMT -5
... *throws hands in air* You talking about invisible baseball bats is a lot different than countering people who think Sting has zero chance of showing up. ?.......Yea, you're lost, loll. Sorry buddy. Words fail me. They really do. Sting has a .5% chance of showing up, leave it at that. And he only has that because THEORETICALLY anything could happen. I want him to show up, I REALLY do... but it won't happen. And really, I had higher hopes until I listened to most of your "arguments" for it. |
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2011 15:22:28 GMT -5
?.......Yea, you're lost, loll. Sorry buddy. Words fail me. They really do. Sting has a .5% chance of showing up, leave it at that. And he only has that because THEORETICALLY anything could happen. I want him to show up, I REALLY do... but it won't happen. And really, I had higher hopes until I listened to most of your "arguments" for it. Dude, like you don't what we were talking about..? Read. In words, you think i am. I'm not. I answer ppl when they quote me. We're just discussing. And if it gets.... a little bad, so..? As long as we are still cool with each other. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 10, 2011 15:23:27 GMT -5
Instead of reading, there should be thinking.
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2011 15:25:21 GMT -5
Instead of reading, there should be thinking. Yea well...thats what i've doing with these 2.21.11 promos. |
|
|
|
Post by Rule 30 on Feb 10, 2011 15:31:05 GMT -5
Instead of reading, there should be thinking. imo, people have thought TOO much about these promos. Like the people that wanted a screen cap of Sting boots from the promo back in 1997. Come on now. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 10, 2011 15:32:17 GMT -5
Instead of reading, there should be thinking. imo, people have thought TOO much about these promos. Like the people that wanted a screen cap of Sting boots from the promo back in 1997. Come on now. They aren't thinking logically. We need logical thinking. |
|
ECFS
Main Eventer
I make custom figure shirts and accessories.
Joined on: May 8, 2008 14:44:14 GMT -5
Posts: 2,831
|
Post by ECFS on Feb 10, 2011 15:38:51 GMT -5
undertaker doesnt need a stupid return promo video. this will be his 100th return. ugh.
|
|
|
|
Post by MacReady on Feb 10, 2011 15:42:59 GMT -5
Yankees.....forever...... Why..... do..... you..... type..... like..... this?
You have literally become my least favorite WF member in history due to all this Sting crap your flinging around, seriously, cut it out, it's not funny anymore.
So, again, I'll pose this question to keep this on topic, any idea why Taker is coming back to Raw, when the last two people he was involved with are on Smackdown?
|
|
|
|
Post by 3onemovement on Feb 10, 2011 15:53:46 GMT -5
Yankees.....forever...... Why..... do..... you..... type..... like..... this? You have literally become my least favorite WF member in history due to all this Sting crap your flinging around, seriously, cut it out, it's not funny anymore. So, again, I'll pose this question to keep this on topic, any idea why Taker is coming back to Raw, when the last two people he was involved with are on Smackdown? I'm thinking since the original nexus is on raw that takers coming back, granted no Kane and barrett. But that's what I'm going with. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 10, 2011 15:57:12 GMT -5
Why would Taker watch TV?
He doesn't know that Barrett is on Smackdown now so he is going to the last place Barrett was before Taker left.
|
|
|
|
Post by chaz on Feb 10, 2011 16:02:17 GMT -5
Yankees.....forever...... Why..... do..... you..... type..... like..... this? You have literally become my least favorite WF member in history due to all this Sting crap your flinging around, seriously, cut it out, it's not funny anymore. So, again, I'll pose this question to keep this on topic, any idea why Taker is coming back to Raw, when the last two people he was involved with are on Smackdown? I assume to begin to rumoured feud with Triple H/Shawn Michaels. |
|
