|
Post by sullygrunt on Feb 16, 2011 21:59:49 GMT -5
I remeber him as my graduating class chose a horrible song for our class song. The worlds greatest... and that he peed on little girls
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Feb 16, 2011 22:06:25 GMT -5
you are one of the people i was talking about and you know it. the most recent example is you making a post regarding burroughs, which obviously stems off your interest in kurt cobain. i believe the thread 'clouds' was the one before, but there very well could've been another. never mind the endless threads directly about nirvana you've created that have gone far past simply mundane.
of course, you'll argue this, as you argue everything even when it is quite clear that you are pathetically wrong. i don't need to prove my point to you, look at the majority of wf user's comments towards your trademark behavior.
the bottom line is people's redundant threads are digressive for the forum as a whole; the entertainment board at one time was by far the board on wf held at highest esteem...now it's like a bad tabloid.
|
|
|
Post by MacReady on Feb 16, 2011 22:13:14 GMT -5
you are one of the people i was talking about and you know it. the most recent example is you making a post regarding burroughs, which obviously stems off your interest in kurt cobain. i believe the thread 'clouds' was the one before, but there very well could've been another. never mind the endless threads directly about nirvana you've created that have gone far past simply mundane. of course, you'll argue this, as you argue everything even when it is quite clear that you are pathetically wrong. i don't need to prove my point to you, look at the majority of wf user's comments towards your trademark behavior. the bottom line is people's redundant threads are digressive for the forum as a whole; the entertainment board at one time was by far the board on wf held at highest esteem...now it's like a bad tabloid. Extremely well put, kudos. I agree 110% with everything you said, in fact I just caught another thread which is exactly this and you said EVERYTHING I wanted to express in that thread. You're a good man.
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Feb 16, 2011 22:13:39 GMT -5
you are one of the people i was talking about and you know it. the most recent example is you making a post regarding burroughs, which obviously stems off your interest in kurt cobain. i believe the thread 'clouds' was the one before, but there very well could've been another. never mind the endless threads directly about nirvana you've created that have gone far past simply mundane. of course, you'll argue this, as you argue everything even when it is quite clear that you are pathetically wrong. i don't need to prove my point to you, look at the majority of wf user's comments towards your trademark behavior. the bottom line is people's redundant threads are digressive for the forum as a whole; the entertainment board at one time was by far the board on wf held at highest esteem...now it's like a bad tabloid. So what you're saying is that nobody should post news related thing about anybody? So basically the entertainment board should never have anything posted in it? lol... It don't matter how many people agree with you, they're wrong.. Simple as that, it's a forum, you post in a forum, you discuss things. Quit bitching and trying to pick fights, nobody makes you read it, if you don't like the way things are, simply leave. Of course I made topics on Nirvana and Kurt Cobain, Burroughs, Foo Fighters... I'm not the only one. It's what you do. Why the hell would I post something about Lil Wayne or something about "Kiesha's" new album? I could careless about those two musicians, which is why I usually skip reading the topics that involve them when someone who's a fan of them creates a topic about them. Sort of like Lady Gaga with Slappy or Cobra, they're Gaga fans, they'll more than likely be the ones creating a topic involving Gaga.. & btw, I'm pretty sure I even mentioned in the Burroughs topic that I found out about the guy from Cobain.. lol.. You make no sense. There is a difference between posting something that is news worthy, something brand new that came out about the artist/band and then making a topic like this ( which has been posted twice now. )
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Feb 16, 2011 22:23:39 GMT -5
yea, i'm the one that makes no sense yet some of the most respected posters on this site have said time and time again that you're intellectually- disabled. sure. do the math kid. ...but wait, this is where you say "lol what r u talking about there's no math - that is a question of logic! u make no sense!"
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Feb 16, 2011 22:26:49 GMT -5
yea, i'm the one that makes no sense yet some of the most respected posters on this site have said time and time again that you're intellectually- disabled. sure. do the math kid. ...but wait, this is where you say "lol what r u talking about there's no math - that is a question of logic! u make no sense!" &... Still you haven't told me your point, it'd be nice for people to have enough sense to admit when they're wrong. I keep pointing out things that you can't explain? You're in the wrong, I've done the same several times to people in the past as well, & even I have been wrong before. This isn't the past, we're talking about now.. lol... You just proved me right anyways with the whole trying to start a fight thing, replying with no answer & calling me " kid " as others do when you idiots don't even know my age.
|
|
|
Post by Calcifer Boheme on Feb 16, 2011 22:32:48 GMT -5
I always think of this Also, In the Closet was weird... I do like his new album though. I imagine he'll always have supporters and detractors for the rest of his life and beyond.
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Feb 16, 2011 22:39:03 GMT -5
you are quite obviously young and mentally immature or else you have serious learning disabilities. no ifs, ands, or buts. it's obvious in the way you write and your processing of information/logic behind thought. i explained my point very well already, but if you're going to make me go step-by-step, you know what, you got it! i'll slow down and explain this bit by bit...just for you to wrap your head around.' ok, say we're using the comics board as an example: i like comic books. i also like batman. naturally, i like when people who enjoy comics discuss batman. so when i came onto the wf comics board, i saw that no one was discussing batman yet so i thought 'hey, why not, lets see what everyone thinks of batman!' and i made a thread called 'what do you think of batman'. so everyone comes on the comic board and some people like him, some people don't, some don't care but everyone says what they think. some people mention how they like catwoman but think batman is lame. either way, no one thought the thread was a bad idea and it was a good conversation. a week goes on...people have stopped talking about batman yet i still want to discuss him. so do i make another thread about him? see, this is where you'd say yes...and you'd just make a thread specifically about catwoman, so when anyone says "hey, you already made a batman thread!" you get to say "this isn't about batman you IDIOT, this is about catwoman: completely different". this is obviously not true. a week after that you find out that frank miller, one of the main batman writers, made other interesting series. you decide to make a thread about him. ...see the problem here? this would all be fine if it was a batman forum...obviously the conversation would circulate around that as the main topic. but there simply is not enough of support for batman to have topics all the time, just like beiber...nirvana...gaga. if they're putting out a new album and it's actually something hugely noteworthy enough to post on a wrestlingfigs entertainment board, then fine, but if it's the 6th thread about one of kurt cobain's side interests....then use your ing head.
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Feb 16, 2011 22:52:20 GMT -5
you are quite obviously young and mentally immature or else you have serious learning disabilities. no ifs, ands, or buts. it's obvious in the way you write and your processing of information/logic behind thought. i explained my point very well already, but if you're going to make me go step-by-step, you know what, you got it! i'll slow down and explain this bit by bit... just for you to wrap your head around.' ok, say we're using the comics board as an example: i like comic books. i also like batman. naturally, i like when people who enjoy comics discuss batman. so when i came onto the wf comics board, i saw that no one was discussing batman yet so i thought 'hey, why not, lets see what everyone thinks of batman!' and i made a thread called 'what do you think of batman'. so everyone comes on the comic board and some people like him, some people don't, some don't care but everyone says what they think. some people mention how they like catwoman but think batman is lame. either way, no one thought the thread was a bad idea and it was a good conversation. a week goes on...people have stopped talking about batman yet i still want to discuss him. so do i make another thread about him? see, this is where you'd say yes...and you'd just make a thread specifically about catwoman, so when anyone says "hey, you already made a batman thread!" you get to say "this isn't about batman you IDIOT, this is about catwoman: completely different". this is obviously not true. a week after that you find out that frank miller, one of the main batman writers, made other interesting series. you decide to make a thread about him. ...see the problem here? this would all be fine if it was a batman forum...obviously the conversation would circulate around that as the main topic. but there simply is not enough of support for batman to have topics all the time, just like beiber...nirvana...gaga. if they're putting out a new album and it's actually something hugely noteworthy enough to post on a wrestlingfigs entertainment board, then fine, but if it's the 6th thread about one of kurt cobain's side interests....then use your ing head. Lol, so much fail here.
It's obvious in the way I write? Kinda like the way you just did ( marked the errors in bold. ) But nevermind that, it has nothing to do with the topic, but that's the usual for you. Going off topic.
I also like how you'd " know what I would do. " You haven't answered anything, you've posted three, four times now and each reply completely ignores what I said, You still can't find any topics about what you're talking about besides this R Kelly one. It's a forum. Simple as that, you post things in a forum, you don't spam the samething over and over, which has not been done.
What YOU need to do is go make a topic in the WWE section and complain there where it's actually needed. What I mean by that is everytime we have Monday Night Raw, we constantly get topics related to Raw, several btw outside of the Official Thread for Raw. That's something to complain about, not a topic related to Gaga/Nirvana/Bieber/etc that is posted in the entertainment. It's news, it's the entertainment topic. That's just what is done. If we had a new topic every week on Gaga/Nirvana/Bieber that was basically the same, then it'd be a problem. But if say Bieber released a new album, someone posted that, and then Bieber got in a fight with some other celeb, that would need it's own topic. Unless it's posted by the same person than he/she would need to edit the original topic and add the 2nd story in with the 1st.
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Feb 16, 2011 22:55:38 GMT -5
Pissing on some girl.
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Feb 16, 2011 23:04:54 GMT -5
1) you actually are mentally handicapped if you think i unintentionally don't capitalize my posts. just sad...
2) i've referenced two other threads solely by you already! one being clouds, two being burroughs. throw in commander cool making a gaga thread here, iceman making a r. kelly thread there, and we've got your average week in the wf entertainment board.
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Feb 16, 2011 23:07:27 GMT -5
1) you actually are mentally handicapped if you think i unintentionally don't capitalize my posts. just sad... 2) i've referenced two other threads solely by you already! one being clouds, two being burroughs. throw in commander cool making a gaga thread here, iceman making a r. kelly thread there, and we've got your average week in the wf entertainment board. 1. You don't know what you're talking about. 2. Those topics prove my point as to them needing their own topic, Burroughs was probably the first time in history it ever has been posted here, I posted a video relating to Burroughs, it was about Burroughs, I mentioned Cobain in it to tell how I found out about him. Clouds? I don't know what you are even talking about.. Cobra/Slappy makes topics on Gaga because they can and it's not spam, each one is something different. Learn how to forum.
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Feb 16, 2011 23:14:48 GMT -5
learn how to 'forum'? i've been here 7 more years than you, lmao. i think if anyone needs to learn etiquette, it's your 12 year old ass. and the gaga topics are essentially spam, it's 'let's talk about how gaga is great one more time'. next time you hear about a ing ren and stimpy song, keep it to yourself.
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Feb 16, 2011 23:40:37 GMT -5
learn how to 'forum'? i've been here 7 more years than you, lmao. i think if anyone needs to learn etiquette, it's your 12 year old ass. and the gaga topics are essentially spam, it's 'let's talk about how gaga is great one more time'. next time you hear about a ing ren and stimpy song, keep it to yourself. Yup, 7 years and still fail. 12 years old? Funny seeing how you don't know my age, once again proving me right with the not only arguing but with you not having an idea of what you're talking about.
Nope, they post Gaga related material that they find interesting such as her new album. Get over it.
Lol Umad. Ren and Stimpy song, I'm guessing you're talking about the topic where Cobain so called " wrote a song " for the show? Why would I keep it to myself? It's news that should be posted in the entertainment, nobody makes you read the stuff.. Sounds like you should probably just leave the forums since you have a hard time understanding that, looks like it gets to you pretty bad.
But what do I know? I'm just a " 12 year old. "
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Feb 16, 2011 23:49:56 GMT -5
exactly, you know nothing.
|
|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Feb 17, 2011 7:45:56 GMT -5
With all due respect, the people who only know three of his songs don't matter because, as you said, they'll remember him more for the kid thing as they never had a focus on his music to begin with. So you're basically saying that the opinion people who know more of his songs (i.e. his fans, more or less) is more important than the rest of the world's opinion? What nonsense. To him, yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. It's not nonsense at all. Think about it. Are you going to be more concerned about what your fans, the people who've been following your music and career for almost 20 years, think of you? Or who you concern yourself more about the ones who wouldn't listen to your music if they were even given the opportunity to?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 31, 2024 19:34:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2011 13:12:03 GMT -5
peeing on an hasing sects with underage girls :/
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Feb 17, 2011 15:30:57 GMT -5
I've never heard any of his stuff, but he does seem to have singing talent, not something you can say for most mainstreem artists of the past decade or so, but to say he's the king of R&B...come on, that is really pissing on a whole hell of a lot of people that were better.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 31, 2024 19:34:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2011 18:16:13 GMT -5
I've never heard any of his stuff, but he does seem to have singing talent, not something you can say for most mainstreem artists of the past decade or so, but to say he's the king of R&B...come on, that is really pissing on a whole hell of a lot of people that were better. bravo bravo ;D
|
|