|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 16, 2011 13:22:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by cjskittles4 on Feb 16, 2011 13:24:47 GMT -5
They just need to throw his ass in jail and get it over with  |
|
|
|
Post by The UndyTaker on Feb 16, 2011 13:34:26 GMT -5
He could have served almost 6 months already, and I'm guessing if he going to serve any time it would be something like that. Good luck to him.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan17: The Total Package on Feb 16, 2011 15:39:18 GMT -5
He could have served almost 6 months already, and I'm guessing if he going to serve any time it would be something like that. Good luck to him. I know. Seems like he was like OJ, did it and got away with it. |
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Feb 16, 2011 16:25:40 GMT -5
He could have served almost 6 months already, and I'm guessing if he going to serve any time it would be something like that. Good luck to him. But since he probably wont serve more than 30 days, if even that, sounds like a good plan. |
|
|
|
Post by roddypiper on Feb 16, 2011 16:27:21 GMT -5
This is disgusting given the amount he was caught with.
|
|
|
|
Post by DMO™ on Feb 16, 2011 17:01:33 GMT -5
Just throw the  er in jail and get it over with. |
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Feb 16, 2011 18:43:13 GMT -5
yay, more defenses.
|
|
|
|
Post by jfinnomore on Feb 16, 2011 19:23:17 GMT -5
god bless how speedy the american justice system is. good thing he could afford bail other wise he would be sitting in jail still.
|
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 16, 2011 20:28:01 GMT -5
All the people saying he could have been in jail already... He ain't going to jail, and if he does, it would probably be 30 days, max (and even then, he probably wouldn't serve all of that in jail). You guys do know the charges due to the amount were "intent to distribute" which he clearly had no actual intent of doing. They've reached some sort of plea deal as it were, those who know nothing of the legal system should probably not say anything about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 16, 2011 20:29:13 GMT -5
All the people saying he could have been in jail already... He ain't going to jail, and if he does, it would be 30 days, max (and even then, he probably wouldn't serve all of that in jail). You guys do know the charges due to the amount were "intent to distribute" which he clearly had no actual intent of doing. They've reached some sort of plea deal as it were, those who know nothing of the legal system should probably not say anything about it. And you know that the plea will be for a maximum of 30 days how? |
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 16, 2011 20:31:28 GMT -5
All the people saying he could have been in jail already... He ain't going to jail, and if he does, it would be 30 days, max (and even then, he probably wouldn't serve all of that in jail). You guys do know the charges due to the amount were "intent to distribute" which he clearly had no actual intent of doing. They've reached some sort of plea deal as it were, those who know nothing of the legal system should probably not say anything about it. And you know that the plea will be for a maximum of 30 days how? Whoops, meant to add the word probably there, I'll fix it. It would probably be 30 days, obviously I don't know the content of the plea deal they have, but based on TNA's push and the fact he wasn't going to actually distribute the drugs, I'd imagine it would be close to that if he were to get any jail time at all. |
|
motleyspoisongun
Main Eventer
14 USA Refs & 1 UK Ref
Joined on: Oct 4, 2006 13:26:28 GMT -5
Posts: 2,074
|
Post by motleyspoisongun on Feb 16, 2011 20:34:31 GMT -5
gotta love our justice system
|
|
|
|
Post by jfinnomore on Feb 17, 2011 0:11:30 GMT -5
And you know that the plea will be for a maximum of 30 days how? Whoops, meant to add the word probably there, I'll fix it. It would probably be 30 days, obviously I don't know the content of the plea deal they have, but based on TNA's push and the fact he wasn't going to actually distribute the drugs, I'd imagine it would be close to that if he were to get any jail time at all. if you knew the law like you lectured others about then you'd know the amount itself shows intent, doesn't matter if he says its for personal use, the letter of the law is x amount = intent. since he got caught with x amount, pretty much a slam dunk to prosecute intent. not that i think he's gonna get jail time but don't tell others not to spout out about the case if they don't know the law when you don't seem to know it either. |
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 17, 2011 0:56:43 GMT -5
Whoops, meant to add the word probably there, I'll fix it. It would probably be 30 days, obviously I don't know the content of the plea deal they have, but based on TNA's push and the fact he wasn't going to actually distribute the drugs, I'd imagine it would be close to that if he were to get any jail time at all. if you knew the law like you lectured others about then you'd know the amount itself shows intent, doesn't matter if he says its for personal use, the letter of the law is x amount = intent. since he got caught with x amount, pretty much a slam dunk to prosecute intent. not that i think he's gonna get jail time but don't tell others not to spout out about the case if they don't know the law when you don't seem to know it either. If it were going to a jury or judge's decision, you are 100% ABSOLUTELY RIGHT! But we're talking about a plea deal here, that's the key. The fact that he had no intention helped their negotiations to keep him from going to jail is my point. You have to keep in mind that's what this is all about. From the straight up "what does the law say", that is certainly correct, but plea deals and negotiated deals work... differently (whether they should or not, is another story). In other words, there is no "building a case to prosecute with" since the two sides are working together on an agreement. |
|
eddie eddie
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 17, 2009 17:54:26 GMT -5
Posts: 2,873
|
Post by eddie eddie on Feb 17, 2011 3:47:57 GMT -5
i don't give a if Jeff Hardy does drugs and he shouldn't be going to jail for it. |
|
|
|
Post by figurecollector on Feb 18, 2011 20:02:14 GMT -5
Jeff is going to die of old age before this gets resolved.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 18, 2011 23:36:06 GMT -5
if you knew the law like you lectured others about then you'd know the amount itself shows intent, doesn't matter if he says its for personal use, the letter of the law is x amount = intent. since he got caught with x amount, pretty much a slam dunk to prosecute intent. not that i think he's gonna get jail time but don't tell others not to spout out about the case if they don't know the law when you don't seem to know it either. If it were going to a jury or judge's decision, you are 100% ABSOLUTELY RIGHT! But we're talking about a plea deal here, that's the key. The fact that he had no intention helped their negotiations to keep him from going to jail is my point. You have to keep in mind that's what this is all about. From the straight up "what does the law say", that is certainly correct, but plea deals and negotiated deals work... differently (whether they should or not, is another story). In other words, there is no "building a case to prosecute with" since the two sides are working together on an agreement. A judge has to approve the plea deal. So if the prosecution comes up with a 30 day deal for Jeff and he accepts it. The judge could say no and that he/she won't allow anything less than 90 days in jail for Jeff. If Jeff doesn't like that then he'd have to go for a jury trial. It's up to the judge if the deal is accepted. |
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Feb 18, 2011 23:40:44 GMT -5
Whoops, meant to add the word probably there, I'll fix it. It would probably be 30 days, obviously I don't know the content of the plea deal they have, but based on TNA's push and the fact he wasn't going to actually distribute the drugs, I'd imagine it would be close to that if he were to get any jail time at all. if you knew the law like you lectured others about then you'd know the amount itself shows intent, doesn't matter if he says its for personal use, the letter of the law is x amount = intent. since he got caught with x amount, pretty much a slam dunk to prosecute intent. not that i think he's gonna get jail time but don't tell others not to spout out about the case if they don't know the law when you don't seem to know it either. Here we go again. Common sense just cant prevail. If this was someone other than Jeff Hardy, a WFig beloved, the story and opinions would be much different. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 18, 2011 23:48:29 GMT -5
if you knew the law like you lectured others about then you'd know the amount itself shows intent, doesn't matter if he says its for personal use, the letter of the law is x amount = intent. since he got caught with x amount, pretty much a slam dunk to prosecute intent. not that i think he's gonna get jail time but don't tell others not to spout out about the case if they don't know the law when you don't seem to know it either. Here we go again. Common sense just cant prevail. If this was someone other than Jeff Hardy, a WFig beloved, the story and opinions would be much different. Are you being sarcastic? |
|
