Most generic song ever?

Any pop/rap/dance bullcrapfrom the past decade or so, as far as rock music, AC/DC.

Do people really believe this illuminati bullshit? lololol

I'm a huge Iron Maiden fan with every CD in my car.(literally bought them all off eBay).

The Final Frontier aside from like one song is pretty bland. I was so disappointed since everything since their 2001 reunion had been superb.

You're opinion today's music compared to the 60's, 70's and 80's is irrelevent to the statement that "the majority of songs that have been released over the past five years", which is a little ignorant and a little moronic.

I'm not disagreeing with you on the fact that older music holds an overall better standard than newer music, but 1) you haven't heard the majority of songs released over the last few years and 2) you obviously aren't looking enough if you can't find original music, because theres SO many original bands out there from the last decade.

id say ac/dc or guns, very generic rock, i never got into either
but dear god most poop on the radio is shocking and generic, all similar, umberella = same word over pretty much =/

True, but this cover makes up for it.

soundcloud.com/codepie/baby

I would say this is the most generically country song EVER.


Every stereotype of country music in one song. Dead dog, playing guitar in your room, about your "home", overly twangy voice, steel lap guitar. Her acceptance speech for this song was even worse, "I want to thank Tom Douglas and Allen Shamblin for writing this." Listen I know most of country music is written by other people, everyone does, just don't try and act sincere about a song that isn't actually about you.



Here's my issue with your first statement, older music holds because it's been around a lot longer. You don't know where certain artists will be in 10/15 years and how their music will hold. I can make a few guesses that, not to be a prick, will more than likely hold true. But that's coming from a general understanding of knowing how artists really hold over time and don't disappear because they're not a Billboard band so to speak. Bands who aren't writing for hits but making full albums that hold weight will be the bands that people say are better than whats coming out currently when we're much older.

I hate to write a giant paragraph, but saying older music holds better has no fact. Being about 10 years old doesn't compare to say a 40 year old Velvet Underground record. There's still people discovering Velvet Underground loving them. But there's how many bands listing them as influences influencing that choice to listen to them?

I guess we agree mainstream = generic?