Short Career, Biggest Impact, Most Success?

Brock Lesnar, he was HUGE! He was very talented, very young, and very over. I think that if he would have stayed there would have been no John Cena Reign of Terror.

Other: The Rock. 95-02 is about the time period he was in WWE which is 7 years. Warriror and Goldberg couldn't have been much shorter than that.

Goldberg was in the business for a little more than 3 years.... maybe pushing 4, with barely any time in the Power Plant before his debut.

He won like 3-4 world championships.... beat Hogan, Hart, Sting, Flair, Triple H, Shawn Michaels amongst others....

For the amount experience within the business, there's no doubt he had the biggest impact and success in a short period of time.

Lesnar was in OVW for 2 years maybe, then had a good 3-4 year WWE career, but alot of the higher up WWE guys (aside from Rock and Taker) wouldn't put him over to make his run more legendary.

Warrior had a good run, but alot of it was in the mid-card battling for the IC title because Hogan was the main baby face of the company at the time. Lesnar had 2-3 months of mid-card, won the King of the Ring and was already main eventing summerslam and winning the title. Goldberg had a short run to the US title and went straight to Hogan because he was getting over so fast.

Goldberg had HUGE impact on wrestling. Toward the end of Lesnar's run I couldn't care less about the guy. He was dominating, great. Goldberg had a huge winning streak that helped put him over. When WCW was dominated by the most over done group in wrestling, you had Goldberg. Lesnar was like Goldberg with more talent to me. Warrior was really over but so was WWF as a whole. When your main eventing along side Hogan and cutting bizarre promos that only little kids can understand, you'll be over. But as much as I hate Goldberg, I go with him on this one.

I voted for Brock Lesnar on a technicality, basically:

Ultimate Warrior: When you take everyone at the height of his career, Warrior had the greatest single moment of any of those guys (WM6 win over Hogan), better merchandising, and tons of fans. However, he was around for like 4 years in pro wrestling before his popularity exploded. Warrior had four years to hone his gimmick and work matches in various territories before his big run. Brock's entire career was shorter than Warrior's climb to the top, and Goldberg was also a much bigger "instant" hit than Warrior.

Goldberg: He got over a lot bigger than Brock Lesnar, but his WWE Run really hurt his legacy, IMO. Also, in the last days of WCW he took a few leaves of absence, and when he was there, the booking didn't always flatter him or allow him to maximize his fan base to the extent that he could have.

Brock Lesnar: Ironically, he was the least "over" of the three, but I had to vote for him based on two things: 1) The extreme brevity of his wrestling career compared to how quickly he became a really good worker, and 2) by the time he started alienating his fans by being a jerk, he was already gone from (or on his way out of) WWE. Unlike Goldberg and the Warrior, who became arrogant and disinterested in pro wrestling and then stuck around to milk their name value for a few more years.

Lessnar. He was really nice and cool too. I have a great photo with him from January 2003.

I voted Lesnar, but then I saw that I guy voted for The Rock. I didn't even think of him. It was undoubtedly the Rock.

I didn't put Rock on here because I view the other 3 as being similar in wrestling style. Rock is so far and away in his own category that he'd blow these 3 out of the water and it would be no contest.

Maven