|
Post by snapmare on Apr 29, 2011 10:38:15 GMT -5
Ya Brock might have been good in the WWE and the UFC its nice how Brock conveniently left out the fact he tried out for the NFL and failed
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Apr 29, 2011 12:09:02 GMT -5
He's cocky but most of the stuff he's said is true, most wwe guys would fail at trying to do what Lesnar has done with the transition from wrestling to UFC champion, and he would end 'Taker in a legit fight.
|
|
|
Post by steel on Apr 29, 2011 13:25:22 GMT -5
Entertainia: I'm not going to debate with you what has all ready been recounted in other places before.
I get the fact your gimmick is to spark debate by replying to and posting comments that have all ready been disproven via other articles, interviews or actions or have simply been discussed to death. That being said, I conclude my portion of this discussion with you, to focus on other aspects of normal discussion here with others.
Big thanks to LtD73 for sharing the article!
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Apr 29, 2011 13:33:24 GMT -5
Well damn I didn't know Lesnar was so mad at Taker.
Kinda sad but they should get over it if they are friends.
|
|
|
Post by Rule 30 on Apr 29, 2011 13:43:17 GMT -5
I don't see why Brock has to be so cocky and be all like "No wrestler could become a fighter." Well obviously they want to be wrestlers......
|
|
|
Post by Edge618 on Apr 29, 2011 14:36:48 GMT -5
No WWE wrestler can make the transition like Brock has. Brock forgets, without the WWE he wouldn't of made it as far in MMA as he has, and probably wouldn't of even made it to the UFC. He was signed and promoted because he was a huge WWE wrestler at the time. He wouldn't of got that attention without the WWE. He would of been a no face fighter earning his way up the ladder instead of getting UFC title shots right off duh. If WWE didn't exist i doubt we would know who Brock Lesnar is.
|
|
|
Post by steel on Apr 29, 2011 14:52:53 GMT -5
No WWE wrestler can make the transition like Brock has. Brock forgets, without the WWE he wouldn't of made it as far in MMA as he has, and probably wouldn't of even made it to the UFC. He was signed and promoted because he was a huge WWE wrestler at the time. He wouldn't of got that attention without the WWE. He would of been a no face fighter earning his way up the ladder instead of getting UFC title shots right off duh. If WWE didn't exist i doubt we would know who Brock Lesnar is. *looks around for the thumbs up icon as he exalts*
|
|
Captain d00m - Mr. 3000
Main Eventer
Bringing death and destruction since 2005!
Joined on: Dec 2, 2005 20:52:43 GMT -5
Posts: 3,376
|
Post by Captain d00m - Mr. 3000 on Apr 29, 2011 15:19:16 GMT -5
No WWE wrestler can make the transition like Brock has. Brock forgets, without the WWE he wouldn't of made it as far in MMA as he has, and probably wouldn't of even made it to the UFC. He was signed and promoted because he was a huge WWE wrestler at the time. He wouldn't of got that attention without the WWE. He would of been a no face fighter earning his way up the ladder instead of getting UFC title shots right off duh. If WWE didn't exist i doubt we would know who Brock Lesnar is. Throw in a bunch of curse words about Lesnar, and this is my response. Well said. and Lesnar.
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Apr 29, 2011 16:34:05 GMT -5
Lesnar was the one who was staring a hole through Taker when he saw him being interviewed after the fight was over. It's not like Taker provoked him or anything, Brock was acting like a bitch after he lost his title.
It would really be cool to do a feud based around this, but I doubt it'll happen. It's interesting he didn't rule out a return to wrestling, though.
|
|
|
Post by CF9™ on Apr 29, 2011 16:39:22 GMT -5
Lesnar is an arrogant prick.
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Apr 29, 2011 17:10:15 GMT -5
Lesnar > WWE Roster.
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Apr 29, 2011 17:35:02 GMT -5
Lesnar was the one who was staring a hole through Taker when he saw him being interviewed after the fight was over. It's not like Taker provoked him or anything, Brock was acting like a bitch after he lost his title. It would really be cool to do a feud based around this, but I doubt it'll happen. It's interesting he didn't rule out a return to wrestling, though. Wouldnt you? Lesnar got his ass kicked and after the fight, sees someone he knows has said crapabout him.
|
|
GCYUM
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 2, 2004 15:12:45 GMT -5
Posts: 1,870
|
Post by GCYUM on Apr 29, 2011 17:57:42 GMT -5
Meh. Lesnar is so damn cocky but he can back up everything he says. He is also right, no guy from WWE could move from WWE to UFC and actually be the star he is, let alone even win. Lesnar could literally KILL the Undertaker in a real fight, along with the (probably) the rest of the WWE. That said- Brock. Prick acts like the WWE was bad to him. He forgets just exactly what it did for him.
|
|
AONI
Superstar
Joined on: Jul 8, 2008 22:10:17 GMT -5
Posts: 563
|
Post by AONI on Apr 29, 2011 18:01:38 GMT -5
to be honest, it sounds like a promo and i would not be surprised if he faces Undertaker next year at Wrestlemania. or even makes a small apearance...
|
|
|
Post by "Living Legend" Duttanized on Apr 29, 2011 18:17:03 GMT -5
The Rock's the mutual friend most likely.
|
|
Sonnen
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 16, 2010 8:42:36 GMT -5
Posts: 3,261
|
Post by Sonnen on Apr 29, 2011 18:30:22 GMT -5
Brock Lesnar doesn't owe the WWE anything, he made them money as there star once upon a time. Brock is the one being professional here with his action at the UFC event, not Brock Lesnar. Brock in a UFC main event gets more buy rates than a WWE PPV. So for everyone who wants to slander Brock Lesnar, talk trash about him and put The Undertaker over as the better of the two in this situation, you're stupid. Brock Lesnar became apart of the WWE, he did well at his JOB, and then left for a new business venture and has moved on to much bigger and much better things and he is happy at what he is doing. Gotta problem? Well off. Edit: Some poster posted this "Lesnar was the one who was staring a hole through Taker when he saw him being interviewed after the fight was over. It's not like Taker provoked him or anything, Brock was acting like a bitch after he lost his title." Yea go check the interview he did in the UFC section of the forum, he didn't have a clue where he was there, the people on here need to start getting a full clue of how he saying things, he isn't coming off arrogant all when he talks. After watching the interview I mentioned, it's all 'Taker who's an idiot, but the marks on here wouldn't admit he could do wrong.
|
|
|
Post by No Brokeback on Apr 29, 2011 18:50:39 GMT -5
Brock Lesnar doesn't owe the WWE anything, he made them money as there star once upon a time. Brock is the one being professional here with his action at the UFC event, not Brock Lesnar. Brock in a UFC main event gets more buy rates than a WWE PPV. So for everyone who wants to slander Brock Lesnar, talk trash about him and put The Undertaker over as the better of the two in this situation, you're stupid. Brock Lesnar became apart of the WWE, he did well at his JOB, and then left for a new business venture and has moved on to much bigger and much better things and he is happy at what he is doing. Gotta problem? Well off. Edit: Some poster posted this "Lesnar was the one who was staring a hole through Taker when he saw him being interviewed after the fight was over. It's not like Taker provoked him or anything, Brock was acting like a bitch after he lost his title." Yea go check the interview he did in the UFC section of the forum, he didn't have a clue where he was there, the people on here need to start getting a full clue of how he saying things, he isn't coming off arrogant all when he talks. After watching the interview I mentioned, it's all 'Taker who's an idiot, but the marks on here wouldn't admit he could do wrong. Thank you! You seem to be one of the only ones in this post that makes any sense regarding the situation.
|
|
|
Post by cordless2016 on Apr 29, 2011 19:41:25 GMT -5
How is hating the schedual collapsing under the pressure? Brock was at the top of the WWE. He just hated the travel. That had nothing to do w/ the pressure of being the top guy.
Brock has constantly defended the WWE and pro wrestling from bashers over the years. He knows that pro wrestlers are athletes and admittes that you need to be in top shape to be in the business. He has never brushed it off. He just prefers to not talk about it because it was in his past. He has proven himself as a legit fighter and wants to talk about the current time now and not the past.
How has he disrespected the business and his peers when he constantly defends pro wrestling and the WWE...
Lesnar dominated 95% of their 1st match and made a rookie mistake and that cost him. I think their rematch proved who the better fighter is. W/ Cain, Cain is just an all around better fighter and Brock admitted that. Brock wants his title back and has shown that he is dedicated to MMA by turning down the WWE.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 7:42:24 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2011 20:25:33 GMT -5
He sounds like a dick in this article.
|
|
|
Post by tnafan17: The Total Package on Apr 29, 2011 20:42:56 GMT -5
Brock Lesnar doesn't owe the WWE anything, he made them money as there star once upon a time. Brock is the one being professional here with his action at the UFC event, not Brock Lesnar. Brock in a UFC main event gets more buy rates than a WWE PPV. So for everyone who wants to slander Brock Lesnar, talk trash about him and put The Undertaker over as the better of the two in this situation, you're stupid. Brock Lesnar became apart of the WWE, he did well at his JOB, and then left for a new business venture and has moved on to much bigger and much better things and he is happy at what he is doing. Gotta problem? Well off. Edit: Some poster posted this "Lesnar was the one who was staring a hole through Taker when he saw him being interviewed after the fight was over. It's not like Taker provoked him or anything, Brock was acting like a bitch after he lost his title." Yea go check the interview he did in the UFC section of the forum, he didn't have a clue where he was there, the people on here need to start getting a full clue of how he saying things, he isn't coming off arrogant all when he talks. After watching the interview I mentioned, it's all 'Taker who's an idiot, but the marks on here wouldn't admit he could do wrong. Thank you! You seem to be one of the only ones in this post that makes any sense regarding the situation. After hearing that, he doesn't sound like that much of a dick anymore.
|
|