|
|
Post by cordless2016 on Apr 30, 2011 20:59:06 GMT -5
I hope you realize that 3 of his wins wern't even in the UFC. They were in the EliteXC company, which is nothing compared to the compitition in the UFC. In the UFC, his record was 1-1. He barely defeated Houston Alexander, who had a 2-4 record in the UFC. In his loss, he was humiliated by Matt Mitrione, who isn't even close to being a top dog in the UFC.
Again, your being ignorant of the fact that Lesnar had an amazing wrestling backround and that is why he has successfully made the transition into MMA. Nobody currently in the WWE would have any type of success in the MMA world if they tried to make a serious attempt to get into it. Kurt Angle w/ his amazing wrestling backround had a chance years ago, but is far to old now.
|
|
|
|
Post by jfinnomore on Apr 30, 2011 21:48:59 GMT -5
I hope you realize that 3 of his wins wern't even in the UFC. They were in the EliteXC company, which is nothing compared to the compitition in the UFC. In the UFC, his record was 1-1. He barely defeated Houston Alexander, who had a 2-4 record in the UFC. In his loss, he was humiliated by Matt Mitrione, who isn't even close to being a top dog in the UFC. Again, your being ignorant of the fact that Lesnar had an amazing wrestling backround and that is why he has successfully made the transition into MMA. Nobody currently in the WWE would have any type of success in the MMA world if they tried to make a serious attempt to get into it. Kurt Angle w/ his amazing wrestling backround had a chance years ago, but is far to old now. i think Dolph may be good at MMA if he tried, he's got a great amateur wrestling background, is young, and in great shape. |
|
|
|
Post by jfinnomore on Apr 30, 2011 21:52:27 GMT -5
his 4-2 professional record beg to differ. Yes, I was wrong. I had to look it up. I just remembered that when I watched him...fights that were somewhat important in the UFC, he lost both of them. I didn't pay attention to much of what he did before then. Sorry about that. yeah he had a lack luster run in the ultimate fighter and had a terrible run after that in UFC. so you were on just not spot on. |
|
|
|
Post by Word™ on May 1, 2011 4:16:21 GMT -5
This has nothing to do with The Undertaker..
But as far as career's after wrestling are concerned.. The Rock > Brock Lesnar.
Only The Rock appreciates what WWE did for him.. I like Brock, I think he is a tremendous athlete and a great fighter.. But his ego is killing me right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on May 1, 2011 4:25:39 GMT -5
This has nothing to do with The Undertaker..But as far as career's after wrestling are concerned.. The Rock > Brock Lesnar. Only The Rock appreciates what WWE did for him.. I like Brock, I think he is a tremendous athlete and a great fighter.. But his ego is killing me right now. Did you not read it? |
|
|
|
Post by Word™ on May 1, 2011 4:32:08 GMT -5
I did.. MY post had nothing to do with The Undertaker.. He is so cocky about what he has achieved after Pro Wrestling and how none of them could make it as big as him or be an MMA fighter.. Well The Rock sh*ts all over Brock's MMA career.
|
|
|
|
Post by No Brokeback on May 1, 2011 5:21:58 GMT -5
So, what you're saying is The Rock could make it as a UFC fighter? Either way, what your comparing is completely ridiculous.
Acting and Hollywood are 2 very different things, but I'm sure they're both happy with what they're doing and making boat loads of money doing it. I honestly don't see how The Rock's career is better than Brock's or Brock's is better than The Rock's. It comes down to personal choice and where they themselves find happiness. To compare both and say that The Rock is 'better' is close minded and quite disrespectful to any and all fighters.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gussy on May 1, 2011 12:09:32 GMT -5
of course UFC is becoming popular, it is relatively new. But WWE has been around for over 3 decades. Once UFC is aroung for that long and still has this many fans, then i will respect the product, but i highly doubt ufc will be as popular in 30 years as it is today.
|
|
