|
|
Post by Cult Member BriGuy on Jul 5, 2011 16:59:42 GMT -5
go get her, dexter
|
|
|
|
Post by KMIS™ on Jul 5, 2011 16:59:54 GMT -5
 If only, Dexter. If only ... |
|
|
|
Post by Sleeping Like An Angel on Jul 5, 2011 17:01:09 GMT -5
I think what Slappy is talking about more, (correct me if I'm wrong Slappy) would be the timing of it all. While this whole thing was going on, if it wasn't HER doing that her daughter was missing, she'd be distraught to no end; clearly NOT living a good life. But there was the tattoo..... a little too convenient is all. No, totally! Is there implied question in something like that? Absolutely. Does that make it evidence? Definitely not. It's highly questionable for her to get a tattoo like that and seem carefree as the child she gave birth to is dead. That question, however, is not a fingerprint on a murder weapon. It just simply isn't. And on a jury in a state full of goofballs like Florida who massacred an entire presidential election, I can absolutely see how a defense could make a case against a weak prosecution like that. That's really all I'm saying. The entire system is down to this weird mathematical science and if you don't have the evidence you need, you're not going to get anywhere. Even with a questionable tattoo. Did you -really- just bring up the hanging-chad in 2011? How is that even relevant anymore? |
|
|
|
Post by mikey1974 on Jul 5, 2011 17:03:08 GMT -5
^ So, I ask again, if she didn't kill her daughter, then who did?? OJ. maybe he can help her spend the rest of her life finding the "real" killers on the beach and golf courses of America... |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 7:48:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2011 17:03:58 GMT -5
What is hanging Chad
|
|
|
|
Post by Sleeping Like An Angel on Jul 5, 2011 17:09:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by MC2 on Jul 5, 2011 17:18:57 GMT -5
^ So, I ask again, if she didn't kill her daughter, then who did?? OJ. This made me lol quite a bit. |
|
|
|
Post by RSCTom on Jul 5, 2011 17:20:08 GMT -5
No, totally! Is there implied question in something like that? Absolutely. Does that make it evidence? Definitely not. It's highly questionable for her to get a tattoo like that and seem carefree as the child she gave birth to is dead. That question, however, is not a fingerprint on a murder weapon. It just simply isn't. And on a jury in a state full of goofballs like Florida who massacred an entire presidential election, I can absolutely see how a defense could make a case against a weak prosecution like that. That's really all I'm saying. The entire system is down to this weird mathematical science and if you don't have the evidence you need, you're not going to get anywhere. Even with a questionable tattoo. Did you -really- just bring up the hanging-chad in 2011? How is that even relevant anymore? I did. I guess just the entire idea of a 'swing state' in general still shows lots of indecisiveness to me and blows my mind. It's definitely a different subject, but I brought it up to point out the fact that at least one person on that jury could have a similar thought process to the lapsed and goofy back and forth ideals that some can have. If this had taken place in Ohio, I'd probably be saying the same thing. It's not so much the chad as it is the fact that these situations actually took place, and honestly could happen again during any election until the situation is changed. That's a whole different situation. I am generalizing and I apologize as clearly you live in Florida and are an intelligent person, but it's like Mikey brought up, there's this woman sitting on the ACTUAL JURY with a predetermined thought and desire to "prove the media" wrong that makes it an issue. She should be more concerned with the trial at hand than the defense's last ditch rant on the media, which really has nothing to do with anything. I would say a person like that is more likely to come from somewhere like Florida where the importance of swayed opinion is not only overblown but has caused major issues in the past (and could happen anytime in the future) with electing our president which should be a pretty simple process. So in this otherwise really remarkably well rounded system, human element becomes a flaw, and both sides in this trial are guilty of attempting to take advantage of it. One failed, the other didn't. This on top of the lack of hard evidence. Yikes. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 7:48:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2011 17:21:17 GMT -5
 I seriously hate people who do this. You just want to make yourself feel better and try to act all sarcastic on the internet. oh woohoo!
|
|
|
|
Post by Sleeping Like An Angel on Jul 5, 2011 17:37:23 GMT -5
Did you -really- just bring up the hanging-chad in 2011? How is that even relevant anymore? I did. I guess just the entire idea of a 'swing state' in general still shows lots of indecisiveness to me and blows my mind. It's definitely a different subject, but I brought it up to point out the fact that at least one person on that jury could have a similar thought process to the lapsed and goofy back and forth ideals that some can have. If this had taken place in Ohio, I'd probably be saying the same thing. It's not so much the chad as it is the fact that these situations actually took place, and honestly could happen again during any election until the situation is changed. That's a whole different situation. I am generalizing and I apologize as clearly you live in Florida and are an intelligent person, but it's like Mikey brought up, there's this woman sitting on the ACTUAL JURY with a predetermined thought and desire to "prove the media" wrong that makes it an issue. She should be more concerned with the trial at hand than the defense's last ditch rant on the media, which really has nothing to do with anything. I would say a person like that is more likely to come from somewhere like Florida where the importance of swayed opinion is not only overblown but has caused major issues in the past (and could happen anytime in the future) with electing our president which should be a pretty simple process. So in this otherwise really remarkably well rounded system, human element becomes a flaw, and both sides in this trial are guilty of attempting to take advantage of it. One failed, the other didn't. This on top of the lack of hard evidence. Yikes. It's not so much indecisiveness as it is just a melting pot of different opinions, though I do see your point. Most people in this world are easily manipulated and swayed, that speaks nothing of the state itself. The outcome of this case, opinion that it's bullcrapor not, would have been exactly the same no matter the state in my opinion. The situations could happen to anybody, and the bs of the hanging chad wasn't so much Florida as it was about a dozen jackasses trying to make decisions. Don't worry yourself, I take no offense, I agree with every word you've said pretty much, my point is just that you can't use the Bush/Gore election logically, that's like me mentioning Maximilien Robespierre in a conversation to diss modern day France. Human element has screwed up many things in this word, and it will continue to do so. It's a damn shame but at the same time, we can't exactly leave it up to lizards. It's screwed up the way it is in ways, yet it's worse off if we change it. Way of the world, I suppose. ...Gah, screw it. I'm moving back to Australia. I seriously hate people who do this. You just want to make yourself feel better and try to act all sarcastic on the internet. oh woohoo! Any of the acquaintances I have on this site will tell you I'm a far cry from the stereotype you just mentioned, love. |
|
|
|
Post by Grumpyoldman on Jul 5, 2011 17:37:58 GMT -5
Guilty or not guilty- just think how awful the rest of her life is going to be. Do you think she can go out in public without hearing a remark or comment anymore? I guarantee her tires will be slashed repeatedly, she'll be getting harassing phone calls & letters, and she'll be the talk of any town she moves to. I think she's in the same boat as Jon-Benet Ramsey's parents were. She'll also get book deals, which will probably turn into movie deals. She'll be the hottest commodity for any talk show for a good while. By the time this is all said and done, the bitch will probably be able to buy her own town. Quite true. And I bet Oprah comes out of retirement to get "one more important interview". |
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Jul 5, 2011 17:38:54 GMT -5
I seriously hate people who do this. You just want to make yourself feel better and try to act all sarcastic on the internet. oh woohoo! Well, a lot of people hate it when people are too lazy to do a 10 second Google search to find an answer, and instead ask someone else to explain it to them. If you're going to go that route, don't be upset when people bust on you for it. |
|
Dat guy ova der
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
Dah What?
Joined on: May 16, 2005 19:43:50 GMT -5
Posts: 3,085
|
Post by Dat guy ova der on Jul 5, 2011 17:42:53 GMT -5
I seriously hate people who do this. You just want to make yourself feel better and try to act all sarcastic on the internet. oh woohoo! She gave you an answer, an saved you some time, what are you complaining about? No question for me, Murder in the 1st degree isn't even a question. Death penalty with no solid definite evidence? Please! I personally think that she did it, but I, nor any one of you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that she is guilty. This is where the system wins. Lets say she got convicted and put to death. Then, 50 years later, her previously unknown psychotic neighbor confesses that he killed the girl, and framed her. Let's say that in this horrible, traumatic time in her life, she didn't know how to react and got SMASHED, then got a tattoo? That would have been a massive failure in the system and an innocent woman would have been put to death. For those of you rolling your eyes, this has happened in the past, which is why we have these laws that require definite evidence for a conviction. |
|
|
|
Post by Angel Beast on Jul 5, 2011 17:54:57 GMT -5
from the Where's Randy Savage Tumblar  "Where justice isn't Randy Savage is." |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jul 5, 2011 18:11:15 GMT -5
hope she has lots of bodyguards
|
|
mmondrag96
Main Eventer
43 refs and counting
Joined on: Apr 10, 2010 12:35:28 GMT -5
Posts: 2,923
|
Post by mmondrag96 on Jul 5, 2011 18:13:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by chaz on Jul 5, 2011 18:58:46 GMT -5
from the Where's Randy Savage Tumblar "Where justice isn't Randy Savage is." Sigged. |
|
|
|
Post by MC2 on Jul 5, 2011 19:00:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jul 5, 2011 19:19:27 GMT -5
If only, Dexter. If only ... This is awesome. I thought of that right after I heard the bad news today. Dexter writers should write something similar to this case.  |
|
|
|
Post by Tye Hyll on Jul 5, 2011 19:49:37 GMT -5
|
|
