Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 4:28:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2011 15:42:37 GMT -5
Looking good. I know it's out of context to the full film but the whole blue lit spinning spider room or whatever looks kind of cheesy to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jul 20, 2011 17:51:00 GMT -5
It looks great.
Can't wait.
Garfield is one of my fav younger actors.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain McKay on Jul 20, 2011 18:58:21 GMT -5
The first half of the teaser was good, but I seriously hope they don't put shots like that last POV sequence in the film. We don't need to "BE" Spider-Man to WATCH Spider-Man.
The style-over-substance approach to that entire sequence made me feel like I was watching a guy playing a video game, but like he was doing all the complicated moves right from the get-go and not telling me how he was doing them, so I couldn't possibly keep up.
I'll be interested to see more as it develops, but I still don't like the costume.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. McCluer on Jul 20, 2011 19:01:00 GMT -5
Looks awesome! Stoked, can't wait, seems more based of the ultimate's storyline. Where spidermans, wolverine, cap, and the hulk were all either apart of or accidental casualties of what shield was doing. I'm excited for this film. Too bad its not made by marvel so spidey could be apart of the universe.
|
|
noir
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 20, 2007 6:53:47 GMT -5
Posts: 4,278
|
Post by noir on Jul 20, 2011 19:09:19 GMT -5
The first half of the teaser was good, but I seriously hope they don't put shots like that last POV sequence in the film. We don't need to "BE" Spider-Man to WATCH Spider-Man. Totally agree with this. I'm hoping that final POV scene was simply a way of gradually revealing the look of Spider-man (via the reflection) to the trailer audience. It didn't fit in at all with the style and presentation of rest of the trailer and came across as a mere cheap trick. I don't think, at least I hope it won't be in the actual film. |
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jul 20, 2011 19:12:15 GMT -5
The first half of the teaser was good, but I seriously hope they don't put shots like that last POV sequence in the film. We don't need to "BE" Spider-Man to WATCH Spider-Man. Totally agree with this. I'm hoping that final POV scene was simply a way of gradually revealing the look of Spider-man (via the reflection) to the trailer audience. It didn't fit in at all with the style and presentation of rest of the trailer and came across as a mere cheap trick. I don't think, at least I hope it won't be in the actual film. Also agreed. It felt very out of place and hokey. Maybe I'm in the minority here in being slightly less excited about this after seeing the trailer. Don't get me wrong, I'm definitely very much interested, but seeing all of these scenes reminded me just how short of a time span it's been since Spider-Man. |
|
|
|
Post by doogle on Jul 20, 2011 19:25:05 GMT -5
It'll be in the movie...and it will be in 3-D
|
|
|
|
Post by James Hardy on Jul 20, 2011 19:44:34 GMT -5
Totally agree with this. I'm hoping that final POV scene was simply a way of gradually revealing the look of Spider-man (via the reflection) to the trailer audience. It didn't fit in at all with the style and presentation of rest of the trailer and came across as a mere cheap trick. I don't think, at least I hope it won't be in the actual film. Also agreed. It felt very out of place and hokey. Maybe I'm in the minority here in being slightly less excited about this after seeing the trailer. Don't get me wrong, I'm definitely very much interested, but seeing all of these scenes reminded me just how short of a time span it's been since Spider-Man. Agreed. I wasn't totally against a re-boot, but the trailer really didn't give me any real reason to be totally excited. The origin story doesn't need to be told again.. This just seems like a darker version of the original movie which doesn't have me that intrigued |
|
|
|
Post by Johnny on Jul 20, 2011 20:05:50 GMT -5
Next summer is going to be so great.
|
|
|
|
Post by JTG on Jul 20, 2011 20:41:08 GMT -5
Looks interesting. I'll definitely give it a watch as I'm sure it'll be good. I'm surprised they kept Spider-Man's appearance pretty secretive in that trailer considering all of the photos released last week.
|
|
|
|
Post by Official WF Ghostbuster on Jul 20, 2011 20:41:14 GMT -5
I was so pumped for this movie... then I saw the trailer. It screams "bad fan film" to me.
First off, even though I know he can act, Garfield just doesn't look like Peter Parker to me. His goofy expressions and horrible haircut don't help, but he looks more like he should be in "Emo-Man" instead.
On the same line, why make him emo? It was one of the (many) flaws of Spider-Man 3, that section where he became all emo and lame. Dancing down the street? Ugh.
Casting Martin Sheen and Sally Field was a mistake. I said it. I think they add star power, but does Spider-Man need star power?
I will forgo the obvious "does it even need a reboot" debate, because Hulk was rebooted in 5 years, and the results were awesome. So, the time frame doesn't bother me. What bothers me is that the movie, in my opinion, looks terrible. I loved the first two Spider-Man movies, and own all of them on Blu-Ray. But this? It just has the feel of a fake film. It felt to me like a trailer for a fan film.
|
|
|
|
Post by JTG on Jul 20, 2011 20:49:25 GMT -5
I was so pumped for this movie... then I saw the trailer. It screams "bad fan film" to me. First off, even though I know he can act, Garfield just doesn't look like Peter Parker to me. His goofy expressions and horrible haircut don't help, but he looks more like he should be in "Emo-Man" instead. On the same line, why make him emo? It was one of the (many) flaws of Spider-Man 3, that section where he became all emo and lame. Dancing down the street? Ugh. Casting Martin Sheen and Sally Field was a mistake. I said it. I think they add star power, but does Spider-Man need star power? I will forgo the obvious "does it even need a reboot" debate, because Hulk was rebooted in 5 years, and the results were awesome. So, the time frame doesn't bother me. What bothers me is that the movie, in my opinion, looks terrible. I loved the first two Spider-Man movies, and own all of them on Blu-Ray. But this? It just has the feel of a fake film. It felt to me like a trailer for a fan film. I don't think he's emo as much as hipster. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 4:28:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2011 21:05:22 GMT -5
I think he seems more shy/introverted rather than emo.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Jul 20, 2011 22:52:52 GMT -5
Hmmm... IDK, it looks okay, but there's just something about it that doesn't feel right. It doesn't have the same feel to it like the first one. |
|
|
|
Post by RAC on Jul 20, 2011 22:55:37 GMT -5
It shouldn't feel like the other three movies.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Jul 20, 2011 22:59:20 GMT -5
It shouldn't feel like the other three movies. Well I was super pumped when I first saw the trailers for the original. I was wicked excited for it, this one is just meh to me for some reason. |
|
|
|
Post by Word™ on Jul 21, 2011 0:05:09 GMT -5
I love Garfield, and I'm gonna give this movie a chance. It's gonna be extremely hard to top the original 1st movie in my opinion.. But I will go into this movie with an open mind.. As long as they don't flood it with lame 3D swing tricks like I'm at  ing Universal Studios. I have no problem giving this movie a chance. |
|
|
|
Post by "The Visionary" Eldniw on Jul 21, 2011 0:06:50 GMT -5
YES!!!! This is gonna be awesome....I can't wait!
|
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Jul 21, 2011 2:50:37 GMT -5
WOW. This looks pretty awesome. Not sure where they're going with it, I mean.. I'm sorta lost on why they're re-creating the first film again. I sorta like this guy better than the Peter Parker in the others though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Suckasays on Jul 21, 2011 3:33:48 GMT -5
It shouldn't feel like the other three movies. Well I was super pumped when I first saw the trailers for the original. I was wicked excited for it, this one is just meh to me for some reason. Keep in mind you were 10 years younger too.  |
|
