|
Post by sean™ on Dec 21, 2011 18:19:29 GMT -5
They beat the Chargers in week 12. I believe that is the tiebreaker. We split in the regular season. It doesn't go by "who won head to head most recently". According to Yahoo Sports, the Broncos would win a tiebreaker based on "record in common games".
|
|
eljefe
Superstar
Joined on: Oct 2, 2010 17:39:35 GMT -5
Posts: 733
|
Post by eljefe on Dec 21, 2011 18:33:24 GMT -5
If the Bears beat the Pack, McCown will be known as Saint Josh for the rest of his life.
|
|
|
Post by Greg Weinstein on Dec 21, 2011 20:13:34 GMT -5
We split in the regular season. It doesn't go by "who won head to head most recently". According to Yahoo Sports, the Broncos would win a tiebreaker based on "record in common games". That must be it. Broncos 6-4, Chargers 4-6 .
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 6, 2024 5:35:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2011 22:07:24 GMT -5
In case any of you missed it:
|
|
|
Post by TheNinthCloud on Dec 22, 2011 22:12:44 GMT -5
Saw that. Pretty hilarious.
Colts are holding up better than I thought, but still not playing very well. Can't believe that missed field goal.
|
|
|
Post by Greg Weinstein on Dec 22, 2011 22:50:43 GMT -5
Holy crap, Houston's playing awful. I hate their conservative approach. In and out of the playoffs.
|
|
|
Post by Cult Member BriGuy on Dec 22, 2011 23:19:50 GMT -5
wow houston d shooting itself in the foot on this last colts drive
|
|
|
Post by Greg Weinstein on Dec 22, 2011 23:49:15 GMT -5
wow houston d shooting itself in the foot on this last colts drive I blame the Houston offense. The defense held the Colts to 12 points for 58 minutes. Whoever was calling the offensive plays is a ing idiot. T.J. Yates was 13-15 for the night and 1/10 on third down (settling for a field goal on the last drive). You don't win with check-down throws. I'm so glad the Colts won this game, punching a team who plays it conservatively right in the mouth.
|
|
|
Post by Cult Member BriGuy on Dec 22, 2011 23:51:23 GMT -5
i was referring to those costly penalties
|
|
|
Post by Greg Weinstein on Dec 23, 2011 0:11:23 GMT -5
Their offense still crapthe bed. Kubiak played it bad tonight, not letting the quarterback he has chosen to LEAD THEM IN THE PLAYOFFS show what he has tonight. Kept him handcuffed the entire game.
|
|
Nash
Main Eventer
True join date = May 2006
Joined on: Apr 8, 2010 14:48:43 GMT -5
Posts: 1,695
|
Post by Nash on Dec 23, 2011 1:38:38 GMT -5
wow houston d shooting itself in the foot on this last colts drive I blame the Houston offense. The defense held the Colts to 12 points for 58 minutes. Whoever was calling the offensive plays is a ing idiot. T.J. Yates was 13-15 for the night and 1/10 on third down (settling for a field goal on the last drive). You don't win with check-down throws. I'm so glad the Colts won this game, punching a team who plays it conservatively right in the mouth. That is their whole offense. Checkdowns, or runs. Yates can't throw the ball down the field, thats why I think the Texans are overrated as hell. Their easily a first round knockout as soon as the playoffs start, and this game just exposed them for what they really are tonight. Really happy about the Colts win. That was an impressive drive by Orlovsky, and Reggie made one hell of catch when they needed it the most. Unlike most Colt fans, I do want them to lose the rest of the games and get the no. 1 pick. You have to figure STL will lose this week to the Steelers, and then if the Colts can pick up a win next week against the Jags, they might be in the clear.
|
|
|
Post by Greg Weinstein on Dec 23, 2011 2:42:22 GMT -5
I blame the Houston offense. The defense held the Colts to 12 points for 58 minutes. Whoever was calling the offensive plays is a ing idiot. T.J. Yates was 13-15 for the night and 1/10 on third down (settling for a field goal on the last drive). You don't win with check-down throws. I'm so glad the Colts won this game, punching a team who plays it conservatively right in the mouth. That is their whole offense. Checkdowns, or runs. Yates can't throw the ball down the field, thats why I think the Texans are overrated as hell. Their easily a first round knockout as soon as the playoffs start, and this game just exposed them for what they really are tonight. Really happy about the Colts win. That was an impressive drive by Orlovsky, and Reggie made one hell of catch when they needed it the most. Unlike most Colt fans, I do want them to lose the rest of the games and get the no. 1 pick. You have to figure STL will lose this week to the Steelers, and then if the Colts can pick up a win next week against the Jags, they might be in the clear. Then why not throw in Delhomme or Garcia? I just don't understand why Kubiak is going to go with Yates when you're going to play it THAT conservative. It's a shame, really because the Texans were definitely a pass-first team with Schaub. And you DO want the Colts to draft luck? That last bit was confusing.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 6, 2024 5:35:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2011 8:27:39 GMT -5
I'm sort of rooting for the Colts so the Rams can get the number one overall pick, trade it for possibly two first rounders and some other draft picks, and we can finally start getting some weapons for Bradford and some help in the secondary.
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Dec 23, 2011 8:44:28 GMT -5
In case any of you missed it: I miss Harvey Dahl.
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Dec 23, 2011 9:44:08 GMT -5
I'm sort of rooting for the Colts so the Rams can get the number one overall pick, trade it for possibly two first rounders and some other draft picks, and we can finally start getting some weapons for Bradford and some help in the secondary. If the Rams get the #1 pick.....Bradford is on his way OUT of STL.
|
|
|
Post by ~*Young $ Money*~ on Dec 23, 2011 10:48:46 GMT -5
I'm sort of rooting for the Colts so the Rams can get the number one overall pick, trade it for possibly two first rounders and some other draft picks, and we can finally start getting some weapons for Bradford and some help in the secondary. If the Rams get the #1 pick.....Bradford is on his way OUT of STL. No way. They already invested to much in him.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 6, 2024 5:35:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2011 11:05:19 GMT -5
I'm sort of rooting for the Colts so the Rams can get the number one overall pick, trade it for possibly two first rounders and some other draft picks, and we can finally start getting some weapons for Bradford and some help in the secondary. If the Rams get the #1 pick.....Bradford is on his way OUT of STL. That cannot be further from the truth. The Rams have made it very clear that they plan to move forward with Bradford as their QB. He may have struggled this year, but that can be contributed to injuries, lack of weapons, and a new offense. I'm not directing this at you only, but anybody that truly believes the Rams will take Luck if they have the number one overall pick is beyond stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Dec 23, 2011 11:13:31 GMT -5
As mediocre as I think Bradford is, I highly doubt that the Rams can justify taking Luck.
|
|
|
Post by Tim Tebow™ on Dec 23, 2011 11:33:58 GMT -5
I really hope the Colts don't get Luck....
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Dec 23, 2011 12:25:04 GMT -5
If the Rams get the #1 pick.....Bradford is on his way OUT of STL. That cannot be further from the truth. The Rams have made it very clear that they plan to move forward with Bradford as their QB. He may have struggled this year, but that can be contributed to injuries, lack of weapons, and a new offense. I'm not directing this at you only, but anybody that truly believes the Rams will take Luck if they have the number one overall pick is beyond stupid. I'm sure u have a better inside pulse on the Rams than I do. But the way most NFL experts are talking....there is real concern on whether Bradford is the franchise QB and with Luck staring them in the face, who is considered the greatest prospect since Elway.....it could happen. The biggest concern is Bradford's contract. I cant see any team that realistically has a chance at Luck trading down. It seems to be a consensus that you take Luck #1 overall. Now if I was the Rams....I would roll with Bradford and get myself a fantastic package to build around. Rams DO have some pieces. And while I agree that I think Luck will be a great QB....I dont see him being the greatest of all time and with the right package, it could be more beneficial for a team liek the Rams
|
|