|
Post by Kliquid on Jan 10, 2012 18:01:04 GMT -5
Anyone that's a legitimate contender would be campaigning in every state, not praying to come in 2nd in one state. He doesn't have the money. That's kind of my point.
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Jan 10, 2012 18:29:09 GMT -5
Ron Paul agrees with Mitt Romney on a capitalism topic that other candidates are bashing Romney for.
|
|
|
Post by Richikane on Jan 12, 2012 18:30:21 GMT -5
Obama would be my pick to win a race... ![:P](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Jan 12, 2012 18:58:23 GMT -5
Obama would be my pick to win a race... ![:P](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/tongue.gif) I'd bet on Obama, too. But I'd vote for Ron Paul.
|
|
|
Post by ✖ AJ on Jan 14, 2012 7:28:12 GMT -5
I'd vote for anybody besides Obama at this point, honestly.
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Jan 14, 2012 12:47:00 GMT -5
Judge in Va. rejects GOP primary ballot appeal
By LARRY O'DELL Associated Press
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) -- A federal judge has refused to add Texas Gov. Rick Perry and three other candidates to Virginia's Republican presidential primary ballot.
U.S. District Judge John Gibney ruled Friday that the candidates should have challenged Virginia's primary qualifying rules earlier. Gibney said they knew the rules months ago.
Perry sued last month after failing to submit enough signatures to get on the ballot. Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and Jon Huntsman also failed to qualify and later joined Perry's lawsuit. They asked Gibney to declare Virginia's law unconstitutional and add their names to the March 6 ballot.
Only former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Texas Rep. Ron Paul qualified for the March 6 primary ballot.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOL
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jan 14, 2012 13:14:18 GMT -5
Though I certainly don't consider myself to be a Republican, I side with Ron Paul on most things.
I supported Obama wholeheartedly in 2008, and unfortunately, it's gotten us nowhere.
If Ron Paul doesn't get the nomination, I will more than likely vote for Obama.
I understand the argument that they're polar opposites, and I agree, but when faced with a choice of Obama and the rest of the Republican hopefuls, it becomes an issue of the lesser of two evils, in which, to me, Obama wins every time.
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Jan 14, 2012 15:22:19 GMT -5
Though I certainly don't consider myself to be a Republican, I side with Ron Paul on most things. I supported Obama wholeheartedly in 2008, and unfortunately, it's gotten us nowhere. If Ron Paul doesn't get the nomination, I will more than likely vote for Obama. I understand the argument that they're polar opposites, and I agree, but when faced with a choice of Obama and the rest of the Republican hopefuls, it becomes an issue of the lesser of two evils, in which, to me, Obama wins every time. I honestly can't blame you. Though I would suggest looking into Gary Johnson (who will most likely be the Libertarian nominee) if you want an alternative. I know that it feels like you're "throwing your vote away" to vote for a third party candidate, but I think it's extremely important to vote for someone who you think is the best candidate; versus someone who you think will win.
|
|
|
Post by Deep Figure Value on Jan 14, 2012 21:55:39 GMT -5
Though I certainly don't consider myself to be a Republican, I side with Ron Paul on most things. I supported Obama wholeheartedly in 2008, and unfortunately, it's gotten us nowhere. If Ron Paul doesn't get the nomination, I will more than likely vote for Obama. I understand the argument that they're polar opposites, and I agree, but when faced with a choice of Obama and the rest of the Republican hopefuls, it becomes an issue of the lesser of two evils, in which, to me, Obama wins every time. I honestly can't blame you. Though I would suggest looking into Gary Johnson (who will most likely be the Libertarian nominee) if you want an alternative. I know that it feels like you're "throwing your vote away" to vote for a third party candidate, but I think it's extremely important to vote for someone who you think is the best candidate; versus someone who you think will win. That's why, if my candidate from the primary doesn't get the nod, I still write them in come general election. The write in is there for a reason.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 15, 2012 1:59:33 GMT -5
Paul's campaign announced they will be making a major announcement today.
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Jan 15, 2012 18:27:17 GMT -5
Paul's campaign announced they will be making a major announcement today. Could be about him receiving a big endorsement in S. Carolina.
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Jan 15, 2012 18:34:32 GMT -5
Paul's campaign announced they will be making a major announcement today. Could be about him receiving a big endorsement in S. Carolina. That's my guess. Probably won't really big a "major announcement.'
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Jan 15, 2012 18:42:44 GMT -5
Perhaps Demint? Or didn't he say he's not endorsing anyone?
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Jan 15, 2012 18:55:04 GMT -5
Announcement was that Senator Tom Davis has endorsed Ron Paul.
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Jan 15, 2012 19:38:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Jan 15, 2012 21:12:14 GMT -5
Nobody knows who Senator Davis is. Hardly a "major" announcement. Who cares.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 15, 2012 21:16:22 GMT -5
Nobody knows who Senator Davis is. Hardly a "major" announcement. Who cares. "To get an endorsement from someone like Tom Davis is a big deal. It would speak volumes to folks and make them take notice and give us a look." —Rick Santorum, August 2011 South Carolina knows who he is.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 15, 2012 21:29:48 GMT -5
Jon Huntsman will announce tomorrow he is dropping out.
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Jan 15, 2012 21:34:47 GMT -5
Well so much for his "uplifting" speech after the NH primary.
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Jan 15, 2012 21:40:52 GMT -5
Huntsman taps out.
|
|