|
|
Post by LtD73 on May 28, 2012 12:24:23 GMT -5
How long do you think it will it will take for WWE to scrap the 3 hour raws and go back to 2 hours.
I can't be the only one who thinks the 3 hour raw isn't gonna work out, its not a matter if itll go back to 2 hours, more when itll go back to 2 hours.
|
|
|
|
Post by pxkgotosleep on May 28, 2012 12:25:51 GMT -5
You should of put '2 hours in' Haha!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 23:36:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2012 12:26:31 GMT -5
Why is everyone so against 3 hours?
|
|
|
|
Post by pxkgotosleep on May 28, 2012 12:27:18 GMT -5
Why is everyone so against 3 hours? Because I don't need a pre-show before Raw starts. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 23:36:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2012 12:29:48 GMT -5
Why is everyone so against 3 hours? Because I don't need a pre-show before Raw starts. It's better than 2 hours of TNA, tbh. |
|
|
|
Post by King of Kings on May 28, 2012 12:30:07 GMT -5
I dunno, it could work. Everyone's gonna complain but everyone's gonna watch as long as there isn't a better wrestling promotion on television.
|
|
OYDK?
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 22, 2011 13:55:27 GMT -5
Posts: 2,676
|
Post by OYDK? on May 28, 2012 12:30:09 GMT -5
I think it'll last about a year.
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on May 28, 2012 12:31:54 GMT -5
Why is everyone so against 3 hours? Because 3 hour raws generally suck. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 23:36:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2012 12:34:37 GMT -5
Probably around a year.
|
|
|
|
Post by pxkgotosleep on May 28, 2012 12:36:51 GMT -5
Because I don't need a pre-show before Raw starts. It's better than 2 hours of TNA, tbh. Don't be jealous because TNA gets 2 hours (with ratings) and ROH barely gets a TV deal. Honestly. I can't play 'being a dick on forums' too. |
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on May 28, 2012 12:38:25 GMT -5
I don't think it will. This is Vince McMahon we are talking about. In his opinion, it's his way or the highway and he's NEVER admitted that anything he's ever done was a mistake. He'll do something that's not working forever rather than admit he was wrong about something. So it doesn't even matter if 3 hour RAW's are a success or not because what Vince wants is what's going to happen regardless.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 23:36:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2012 12:39:44 GMT -5
It's better than 2 hours of TNA, tbh. Don't be jealous because TNA gets 2 hours (with ratings) and ROH barely gets a TV deal. Honestly. I can't play 'being a dick on forums' too. Lol I don't care if ROH has a tv deal or not |
|
|
|
Post by pxkgotosleep on May 28, 2012 12:44:04 GMT -5
Don't be jealous because TNA gets 2 hours (with ratings) and ROH barely gets a TV deal. Honestly. I can't play 'being a dick on forums' too. Lol I don't care if ROH has a tv deal or not Keep your opinion to yourself then. Especially in the WWE section. You asked a question and I answered it. No more temper tantrums and lashing out, Kay? Im excited for tonight's Raw, although obviously stated elsewhere I'll probably miss it. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 23:36:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2012 12:45:07 GMT -5
Lol I don't care if ROH has a tv deal or not Keep your opinion to yourself then. Especially in the WWE section. You asked a question and I answered it. No more temper tantrums and lashing out, Kay? Im excited for tonight's Raw, although obviously stated elsewhere I'll probably miss it. Temper tantrums and lashing out? Lol mkay bro not sure where I did either of those and I'll post my opinion anywhere I damn well please |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 23:36:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2012 12:47:43 GMT -5
Keep your opinion to yourself then. Especially in the WWE section. You asked a question and I answered it. No more temper tantrums and lashing out, Kay? Im excited for tonight's Raw, although obviously stated elsewhere I'll probably miss it. Temper tantrums and lashing out? Lol mkay bro not sure where I did either of those and I'll post my opinion anywhere I damn well please Lol, come on AC. This is Wfigs, you're not allowed to have an opinion here. You're only allowed to like what everyone else likes.  |
|
|
|
Post by orton1994 on May 28, 2012 13:43:21 GMT -5
I think the 3 hour Raws will be better for storyline development, and give guys like Ziggler more tv time and time on the mic to further mid card stories
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 23:36:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2012 13:51:30 GMT -5
I kind of like the whole 3 hour deal. Yeah the 3 hour Raws are usually less than spectacular but now they'll be focused solely on making every week 3 hours and they'll write and plan accordingly. With 3 hour Raws now it's usually to promote something or have some kind of special occasion. This opens them up for more potential storylines. More TV time for guys like Ziggler and Rhodes. More opportunity to develop a mid card feud or 2. Having said that, I'm not sure they'll do that. They'll probably just give more time to Cena and his feud of the month.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 23:36:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2012 14:20:57 GMT -5
3 hour Raw's always seem to be filled with more garbage instead of more time given to develop stars and storylines.
I'll give it a year.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Real Valbroski on May 28, 2012 14:21:58 GMT -5
Let's just wait to see how they use the 3rd hour before we start hating on the idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chip on May 28, 2012 14:42:16 GMT -5
everyone is REALLY jumping the gun with this whole thing
everyone is basing their opinions on the half a dozen or so 3 hour RAW's they've put on over the last couple of years....those were SPECIAL EVENTS not treated like a weekly show.
The WWE isn't just going to fill an hour of TV programming with videos and backstage segments, holy craphow thick headed are you people??
|
|
