|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jun 12, 2012 13:36:43 GMT -5
TNA Hall of Fame inductee Sting recently did an interview for The UK Sun, and had the following to say about his near-WWE signing and who he would have faced if the signing had taken place:
"I was close to signing with the WWE. I'd have faced Undertaker at WrestleMania. It wasn't to be and we couldn't come to an agreement. He was the only person I'd want to wrestle there. I'd like to fight Undertaker, but here in TNA I think I could go well with some of the younger guys too. Especially a guy like Magnus."
|
|
|
|
Post by 0,Y on Jun 12, 2012 13:38:10 GMT -5
would have been a dream match, they could have retired together, would have been a great WrestleMania moment
|
|
|
|
Post by jaymieandrogyny on Jun 12, 2012 14:11:11 GMT -5
Sting just needs to sign with WWE for at least a year, shut the hell up, and take my money.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hammersmith Hardman on Jun 12, 2012 14:14:16 GMT -5
2-21-11!
|
|
Mofoin' Mizfit
Superstar
Miz Mark Since 2008.
Joined on: Jun 27, 2009 14:00:29 GMT -5
Posts: 610 
|
Post by Mofoin' Mizfit on Jun 12, 2012 14:16:41 GMT -5
Wow, that would've been great. Talk about match of the century; two of wrestling's legends one-on-one at WrestleMania in a storybook type ending to both of their careers? If only...
|
|
|
|
Post by jaymieandrogyny on Jun 12, 2012 14:21:04 GMT -5
It can still happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Jun 12, 2012 14:32:26 GMT -5
Hasn't Sting said this like 50 times a month? Get it on already.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Jun 12, 2012 14:40:28 GMT -5
I guess Im the only person that has absolutely no desire to see Sting vs Taker. I really dont understand how this is a "dream match" when neither of them have anything in common except they both wear black and are old.
|
|
|
|
Post by OverTheEdge on Jun 12, 2012 14:42:15 GMT -5
I guess Im the only person that has absolutely no desire to see Sting vs Taker. I really dont understand how this is a "dream match" when neither of them have anything in common except they both wear black and are old. Pretty much. I love 'Taker, and he always puts on show-stealing matches at WrestleMania. However, I have zero interest in seeing him face Sting. |
|
|
|
Post by Scotty on Jun 12, 2012 14:45:07 GMT -5
Why cant Sting just sell out already and fullfill the dream match with taker -_-
Every wrestling fan wants to see that
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 23:37:49 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2012 14:47:19 GMT -5
Needed to happen 11 years ago.
|
|
|
|
Post by DontHassleTheHoff on Jun 12, 2012 14:56:52 GMT -5
I do quite resent Sting for his choice to never come to the WWE. The deal they were making must not have been relating to money, as i'm sure they offered him more than he'd get working for TNA, he just chickened out that he would run the risk of not being a top dog and really, the only people to suffer from it were the fans. The dream matches he could have had in that time frame against Taker, HBK, HHH, Austin, Rock, Cena, Orton, Jericho, Guerrero, (while they were at the top) Lesnar, Edge etc, all because he was worried the ball would be dropped.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Jun 12, 2012 15:14:00 GMT -5
I do quite resent Sting for his choice to never come to the WWE. The deal they were making must not have been relating to money, as i'm sure they offered him more than he'd get working for TNA, he just chickened out that he would run the risk of not being a top dog and really, the only people to suffer from it were the fans. The dream matches he could have had in that time frame against Taker, HBK, HHH, Austin, Rock, Cena, Orton, Jericho, Guerrero, (while they were at the top) Lesnar, Edge etc, all because he was worried the ball would be dropped. To be fair, WWE only wants Sting to "feed" him to the Undertaker. We all know Taker isnt going to lose at Wrestlemania. So if Im Sting, a true top tier legend in pro wrestling, I would tell WWE if you want me doing a job on my first, and possibly only appearance in WWE...you're either gonna pad the hell out of my pockets OR you need to schedule me against someone else that I can go over. In no way shape or form should Stings first (and possibly only) match in WWE be a loss to The Undertaker. |
|
Daniel F'n Bryan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 24, 2011 0:33:48 GMT -5
Posts: 2,929
|
Post by Daniel F'n Bryan on Jun 12, 2012 15:19:39 GMT -5
Taker/Sting NEEDS to happen. Weather Sting likes it or not he needs that one run in the WWE to solidify his career and i know im going to get flack for that statement but with what he is doing right now in TNA it is only hurting his legacy much like it did to Hogan and Flair. Had Sting retired after WCW closed then ok he'd be one of the greatest of all time but this TNA run is only down-grading him and he needs to have a run in the WWE against Taker or Punk to cement the legacy he built in WCW.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brad on Jun 12, 2012 15:21:55 GMT -5
I do quite resent Sting for his choice to never come to the WWE. The deal they were making must not have been relating to money, as i'm sure they offered him more than he'd get working for TNA, he just chickened out that he would run the risk of not being a top dog and really, the only people to suffer from it were the fans. The dream matches he could have had in that time frame against Taker, HBK, HHH, Austin, Rock, Cena, Orton, Jericho, Guerrero, (while they were at the top) Lesnar, Edge etc, all because he was worried the ball would be dropped. To be fair, WWE only wants Sting to "feed" him to the Undertaker. We all know Taker isnt going to lose at Wrestlemania. So if Im Sting, a true top tier legend in pro wrestling, I would tell WWE if you want me doing a job on my first, and possibly only appearance in WWE...you're either gonna pad the hell out of my pockets OR you need to schedule me against someone else that I can go over. In no way shape or form should Stings first (and possibly only) match in WWE be a loss to The Undertaker. Agreed, totally. |
|
|
|
Post by comintogetcha on Jun 12, 2012 15:39:48 GMT -5
But durrrr, I thought this was just dirtsheet BS, durrrrrr
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian from 616Entertainment. on Jun 12, 2012 15:43:37 GMT -5
But durrrr, I thought this was just dirtsheet BS, durrrrrr Fictional literature and an interview with a human being are two different things. "Dur." |
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Jun 12, 2012 15:52:07 GMT -5
If Vince and Dixie can negotitate for a Flair/Christian swap....why not step and do a deal for Sting? From January to March....Sting can work WWE. Vince can pony up the dough to make it worth Sting's time and TNA gets someone of equal caliber from August to October for BFG.
|
|
MonsoonMan
Main Eventer
SE Wisconsin, NE Illinois figure hunter.
Joined on: Jan 1, 2012 22:47:05 GMT -5
Posts: 2,451
|
Post by MonsoonMan on Jun 12, 2012 16:02:32 GMT -5
sting probably doesnt want to go the way of goldberg.
he has stated before that he simply does not trust the wwe with the sting character.
|
|
|
|
Post by DontHassleTheHoff on Jun 12, 2012 16:16:58 GMT -5
I do quite resent Sting for his choice to never come to the WWE. The deal they were making must not have been relating to money, as i'm sure they offered him more than he'd get working for TNA, he just chickened out that he would run the risk of not being a top dog and really, the only people to suffer from it were the fans. The dream matches he could have had in that time frame against Taker, HBK, HHH, Austin, Rock, Cena, Orton, Jericho, Guerrero, (while they were at the top) Lesnar, Edge etc, all because he was worried the ball would be dropped. To be fair, WWE only wants Sting to "feed" him to the Undertaker. We all know Taker isnt going to lose at Wrestlemania. So if Im Sting, a true top tier legend in pro wrestling, I would tell WWE if you want me doing a job on my first, and possibly only appearance in WWE...you're either gonna pad the hell out of my pockets OR you need to schedule me against someone else that I can go over. In no way shape or form should Stings first (and possibly only) match in WWE be a loss to The Undertaker. Losing to the Undertaker at wrestlemania is not something to frown upon in your career. In fact, given recent matches, getting to face The Undertaker at WM is pretty much one of the biggest honours you can get in the WWE right now. The outcome of the match would not be the important thing, it would have been the build up and the quality of the match. Given the fact he's been in TNA for so long, I doubt it would have been his only match, and it would in no way, be jobbing. |
|
