|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jul 24, 2012 10:44:18 GMT -5
As reported earlier, WWE's annual Extreme Rules pay-per-view event is being moved back a month next year. The event will occupy the weekend typically reserved for Over the Limit as it takes place May 19th, 2013 at the Scottrade Center in St. Louis, Missouri on May 19th, 2013.
-Ewrestlingnews
So is that 1 PPV a month now? or was there another month with 2 PPVs?
|
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jul 24, 2012 10:47:01 GMT -5
Interesting. Could be a simple switch, or maybe (hopefully) we could see a return of Backlash.
|
|
|
|
Post by el torro on Jul 24, 2012 10:55:12 GMT -5
I just want to know what PPV Chicago will get. I've been PRAYING that we get Royal Rumble for once..but NNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOO..Phoenix gets it. if we get Elimination CHamber, that'd be cool. OR HOW BOUT ANOTHER MitB?!  |
|
|
|
Post by YES! YES! YES! on Jul 24, 2012 11:02:21 GMT -5
Philly wants a ppv. Never had a ppv since 09.
|
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Jul 24, 2012 11:40:50 GMT -5
Extreme Rules fits better in April since its the WM rematches taking place but tweaked up with the stipulations.
Bring back Backlash for the April slot.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brad on Jul 24, 2012 12:48:31 GMT -5
Extreme Rules in STL? I'm there...
|
|
Daniel F'n Bryan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 24, 2011 0:33:48 GMT -5
Posts: 2,929
|
Post by Daniel F'n Bryan on Jul 24, 2012 13:08:30 GMT -5
Yeah seriously where the  is a philly PPV? We havent had one since Night of Champions and there was a rumor that Hell In A Cell was supposed to be here this year but it got changed. Im dying for a PPV soon even though I will be at Mania in Jersey i'd love a PPV here ASAP. |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jul 24, 2012 17:28:14 GMT -5
That is odd.
I guess they will either just move OTL to the spot after WM or bring back Backlash.
Of course they could also not have a PPV in April since most of the times they have WM in the first 5 days of April. That would give Extreme Rules a lot of time to build up matches although something makes me think that wouldn't really make the feuds much better...
|
|
|
|
Post by cmsaint on Jul 24, 2012 21:49:20 GMT -5
I honestly think this is because they might be planning to 'END' feuds at mania instead of starting them like normal, so there giving Extreme Rules time to make new fueds
|
|
5D's
Superstar
Joined on: Aug 21, 2010 14:05:03 GMT -5
Posts: 753
|
Post by 5D's on Jul 25, 2012 1:20:20 GMT -5
Of all the PPVs to cancel, I think the late-April spot is by far the worst one to get rid of. With the way WWE treats the "majesty & pageantry" trainwreck known as Wrestlemania, this just means we're gonna get a solid month of absurd replays of an already over-hyped and under-delivering event.
Placing Extreme Rules directly after Wrestlemania was a great way to clear the air and start some new things while still wrapping up some loose ends; Extreme Rules '11 & '12 were both more impressive than their respective Manias in my opinion. I hope that they either put Over The Limit (I know a lot of people don't care for it but it's also one of my favorite PPVs) or Backlash in the late April spot as opposed to removing it altogether.
|
|
rudyhoneybee
Jobber
Joined on: Dec 29, 2009 0:49:39 GMT -5
Posts: 45 
|
Post by rudyhoneybee on Jul 25, 2012 1:56:41 GMT -5
I just want to know what PPV Chicago will get. I've been PRAYING that we get Royal Rumble for once..but NNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOO..Phoenix gets it. if we get Elimination CHamber, that'd be cool. OR HOW BOUT ANOTHER MitB?! Poor you, Vancouver has been waiting for a ppv since 1998. |
|
|
|
Post by Jaz on Jul 25, 2012 1:58:35 GMT -5
Over the Limit sucked anyways. They need to bring back Backlash.
I don't know why that's such a great PPV, but I've always liked it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 23:30:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2012 2:05:27 GMT -5
Philly wants a ppv. Never had a ppv since 09. TN hasn't gotten a PPV since 2002. Get in line, sir. |
|
Mr Wrestling Jr.
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 6, 2010 7:07:35 GMT -5
Posts: 3,410
|
Post by Mr Wrestling Jr. on Jul 25, 2012 2:06:23 GMT -5
How about Australia getting a PPV? I know may never happen. If Extreme Rules gets built up properly not just rushed, it could be the greatest PPV of the year.
|
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Jul 25, 2012 2:14:17 GMT -5
Philly wants a ppv. Never had a ppv since 09. So...Toronto hasn't had a PPV since 06! |
|
|
|
Post by "Living Legend" Duttanized on Jul 25, 2012 3:27:06 GMT -5
Philly wants a ppv. Never had a ppv since 09. TN hasn't gotten a PPV since 2002. Get in line, sir. Vancouver hasn't had one since '98 get in line. |
|
|
|
Post by cattlemutilation on Jul 25, 2012 5:06:46 GMT -5
Philly wants a ppv. Never had a ppv since 09. TN hasn't gotten a PPV since 2002. Get in line, sir. I know Vancouver is worse off, but Louisville (and pretty sure KY in general, obv) has been waiting since May 21st, 2000.  |
|
|
|
Post by recklessmatten on Jul 25, 2012 8:14:40 GMT -5
TN hasn't gotten a PPV since 2002. Get in line, sir. Vancouver hasn't had one since '98 get in line. U.K hasn't had one since 92 (I don't count rebellion or insurextion) |
|
|
|
Post by done on Jul 25, 2012 12:54:43 GMT -5
Interesting. Could be a simple switch, or maybe (hopefully) we could see a return of Backlash. Hopefully, I never got why they removed Backlash when the last PPV was really good. |
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Jul 25, 2012 12:56:52 GMT -5
I wish WWE would stop changing their pay-per-views. The schedule from ten years ago was perfect. There wasn't a need to change it.
|
|
