|
Post by Scott! on Jun 9, 2013 6:44:52 GMT -5
Because Mattel are 10x better than Jakks have ever been,most jakks figures are completely dreadful,the only reason the headscans are better sometimes is the fact the heads are a lot bigger than Mattel's I'll admit I was really not a fan of the deluxe line, but not most Jakks were awful. Kevin Nash elite is an incredible figure, plus the extra articulation and NWO belt make it must own. I think it goes for a lot, especially here in the uk, since most people never seen it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 5, 2024 3:29:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2013 7:16:42 GMT -5
Because Mattel are 10x better than Jakks have ever been,most jakks figures are completely dreadful,the only reason the headscans are better sometimes is the fact the heads are a lot bigger than Mattel's I'll admit I was really not a fan of the deluxe line, but not most Jakks were awful. Kevin Nash elite is an incredible figure, plus the extra articulation and NWO belt make it must own. I think it goes for a lot, especially here in the uk, since most people never seen it. OCD prohibits me from playing with Jakks now I've realized almost everyone's bodies were the same
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 5, 2024 3:29:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2013 14:32:27 GMT -5
The only problem with the Jakks Nash is the scale. The Mattel one looks terrible (and I'm a huge Nash fan).
The Mattel Diesel is much better.
|
|
|
Post by 3Lephant (Naptown Icon) on Jun 9, 2013 14:39:50 GMT -5
Mattel tries to hard to do attires Jakks hasn't done. I would have much rather had the CS11 attire Diesel over the Elite version. While the Elite looks better and more realistic (which I think most people agree at this point), Jakks did a better job on Nash. Also, quit with the Jakks hate.. they had a far more extensive line that we will never see again because Mattel can't figure out a good strategy for releasing older characters/Legends. Its not like people are looking back and saying "man Jakks did a terrible job on Guy X, I wish we never got him at all"
|
|
|
Post by qdogg on Jun 9, 2013 14:41:46 GMT -5
This is actually more of the answer I was looking for, makes lot more sense, thank you! Nash and diesel were both packed at .5 per case. Assortment A was diesel assortment b was nash. They both would have same production numbers. I dont believe this to be true, because most people never saw Nash at retail, none of the online retailers (Amazon) ever stocked it, but they stocked TONS of Case A, therefore that would mean that somebody elses stores would have to get multiple nash's in to make up the difference.
|
|
Joejitsu22
Main Eventer
Sexy Baked Potato
Joined on: Sept 15, 2011 8:12:28 GMT -5
Posts: 4,059
|
Post by Joejitsu22 on Jun 9, 2013 15:28:59 GMT -5
Nash and diesel were both packed at .5 per case. Assortment A was diesel assortment b was nash. They both would have same production numbers. I dont believe this to be true, because most people never saw Nash at retail, none of the online retailers (Amazon) ever stocked it, but they stocked TONS of Case A, therefore that would mean that somebody elses stores would have to get multiple nash's in to make up the difference. I saw nash waaaay more than diesel. In fact i saw diesel less than a handful of times. I found nash upwards of 20. I bought, sold, traded the Nash's frequently. But whether some areas saw more of an assortment than others, i feel they were made in the same amount. Some areas saw more than others. Unless my chimes in we may never know.
|
|