RAVEN!
Superstar
Joined on: Sept 30, 2012 13:46:28 GMT -5
Posts: 563
|
Post by RAVEN! on Oct 22, 2013 17:52:11 GMT -5
He's also shown in the promo very quickly for Cena/Show in 30YWM!
|
|
|
Post by done on Oct 22, 2013 18:24:16 GMT -5
Despite what happened, Benoit surely deserves to be in the HOF. The mans a legend in professional wrestling from japan to WCW to ECW etc. Imagine if he was still around, I would love to see taker vs benoit which I know if he was still around; it would happen! Would replace the two HHH/Taker matches we got.
|
|
|
Post by ~ Cymru ~ on Oct 22, 2013 19:40:13 GMT -5
Conviction. Snuka wasn't convicted Beniot was... If snuka does get convicted due to the new evidence im sure he will be vetoed as well Technically Benoit was not convicted. He never stood trial for his crimes. The police simply linked him to the murder, which I do believe he committed....much like the police have done with Snuka. You know what I mean though right? Snuka was tried and let go Beniot would gave been found guilty had he not kiled himself too
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Oct 22, 2013 19:42:49 GMT -5
Who?
|
|
Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD
Main Eventer
I need a monster condom for my magnum sized dong.
Joined on: Nov 25, 2011 16:25:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,713
|
Post by Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD on Oct 22, 2013 20:32:07 GMT -5
Technically Benoit was not convicted. He never stood trial for his crimes. The police simply linked him to the murder, which I do believe he committed....much like the police have done with Snuka. You know what I mean though right? Snuka was tried and let go Beniot would gave been found guilty had he not kiled himself too Snuka was not tried otherwise the case would never be reopened (unless he was found guilty and appealed) and you no idea how the Benoit case would have went.
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Oct 22, 2013 20:35:35 GMT -5
No more Benoit threads until the weird kids learn that murdering your wife and child is not Hall of Fame worthy.
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Oct 22, 2013 22:03:08 GMT -5
You know what I mean though right? Snuka was tried and let go Beniot would gave been found guilty had he not kiled himself too Snuka was not tried otherwise the case would never be reopened (unless he was found guilty and appealed) and you no idea how the Benoit case would have went. Correct. He was never on trial. Police could not put enough evidence together to get the DA to indict. But technology is so much stronger, especially in DNA testing today, that they can reexamine the evidence and perhaps make the case for an indictment. From what I have read.....it seems about as cut and dry as Benoit.
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Oct 23, 2013 16:50:26 GMT -5
No more Benoit threads until the weird kids learn that murdering your wife and child is not Hall of Fame worthy. Fair point.
|
|
|
Post by Squid: The Anti-Hero on Oct 23, 2013 16:57:57 GMT -5
this is best for buisness
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Oct 23, 2013 17:40:30 GMT -5
I dont know why they have shunned Benoit, yet still allow Jimmy Snuka on their air waves, mentioning his name and putting him over. Snuka killed a girl in his hotel room. Never convicted and its been a cold case for like 30 years now. But I heard they reopened the case in light of new evidence against Snuka. you answered your own question with the second bolded part. never mind that vince mcmahon supposedly had direct involvement with covering it up with the police as snuka was one of his major draws.
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Oct 23, 2013 17:58:29 GMT -5
I dont know why they have shunned Benoit, yet still allow Jimmy Snuka on their air waves, mentioning his name and putting him over. Snuka killed a girl in his hotel room. Never convicted and its been a cold case for like 30 years now. But I heard they reopened the case in light of new evidence against Snuka. you answered your own question with the second bolded part. never mind that vince mcmahon supposedly had direct involvement with covering it up with the police as snuka was one of his major draws. And like I said....Benoit was never convicted. Both seemed VERY guilty. And yes, I heard about Vince's attempt at covering it up as well. But dont know how much evidence there is on that.
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Oct 23, 2013 19:39:40 GMT -5
No more Benoit threads until the weird kids learn that murdering your wife and child is not Hall of Fame worthy. God seriously. It's like saying Aaron Hernandez belong sin the nfl hall of fame because he was a great Tight End. Who cares if he killed someone right?
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Oct 23, 2013 19:40:39 GMT -5
Who
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 1:55:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2013 20:52:07 GMT -5
Technically Benoit was not convicted. He never stood trial for his crimes. The police simply linked him to the murder, which I do believe he committed....much like the police have done with Snuka. You know what I mean though right? Snuka was tried and let go Beniot would gave been found guilty had he not kiled himself too No he wasn't. Snuka was never tried in criminal court but WAS found guilty in civil court and ordered to pay Nancy Argentino's family $500,000 in restitutions in 1985. Snuka has been found guilty in a court of law.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 1:55:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2013 20:59:03 GMT -5
No more Benoit threads until the weird kids learn that murdering your wife and child is not Hall of Fame worthy.
|
|
Doctor Worm
Main Eventer
They Call me Doctor Worm, Good morning, How're you? I'm Dr.Worm.
Joined on: Aug 2, 2006 8:04:24 GMT -5
Posts: 4,261
|
Post by Doctor Worm on Oct 23, 2013 21:40:23 GMT -5
I love Benoit. he's the lover of my loving lovely love love life! Love him! Did I mention I love him? Love. He really has a stranglehold on your emotions.
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Oct 24, 2013 5:41:28 GMT -5
I love Benoit. he's the lover of my loving lovely love love life! Love him! Did I mention I love him? Love. That's beautiful, man. I'm getting choked up just reading it.
|
|
|
Post by johnnyb on Oct 26, 2013 18:18:55 GMT -5
You know what I mean though right? Snuka was tried and let go Beniot would gave been found guilty had he not kiled himself too No he wasn't. Snuka was never tried in criminal court but WAS found guilty in civil court and ordered to pay Nancy Argentino's family $500,000 in restitutions in 1985. Snuka has been found guilty in a court of law.There is no "guilty" or "not guilty" verdict in civil cases. It's a ruling by the judge but someone who loses a civil suit isn't considered to be guilty of any crimes.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 1:55:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2013 20:32:05 GMT -5
No he wasn't. Snuka was never tried in criminal court but WAS found guilty in civil court and ordered to pay Nancy Argentino's family $500,000 in restitutions in 1985. Snuka has been found guilty in a court of law.There is no "guilty" or "not guilty" verdict in civil cases. It's a ruling by the judge but someone who loses a civil suit isn't considered to be guilty of any crimes. Sounds great, but you're wrong. Although small claims cases are decided by the judge's opinions only, any case over the state statutory minimum is decided by a jury. The verdicts are either "civilly liable" or "not civilly liable" instead of "guilty" and "not guilty", but I didn't feel the need to split hairs because most people aren't familiar with the terminology.
|
|
|
Post by johnnyb on Oct 26, 2013 21:28:51 GMT -5
"Liable" and "guilty" mean two different things is the point I was making. "Liable" doesn't ever result in jail time or anything going onto your record. "Guilty" can.
To be civilly liable for something doesn't mean you committed a crime. Snuka was liable but not guilty of any crimes in a court of law.
|
|