|
Post by BØRNS on Oct 31, 2013 1:31:45 GMT -5
Do you think we're headed towards a title unification match between WHC and WWE championships? 3 things raise my suspicion...
1) Cena's holding the WHC 2) It'll be WM30, a landmark event and historical event 3) WWE is openly talking about the "face" of the company, which would make sense if there were one, unified title
What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Oct 31, 2013 1:38:47 GMT -5
I'd love it. Either Cena vs Punk or Punk vs Bryan. Maybe even a triple threat.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 28, 2024 15:15:10 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2013 2:14:24 GMT -5
Only if it is Punk vs Cena for it. Because lets be honest, they are the Rock-Austin of this generation. Fits better for a unification than Bryan-Punk.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 28, 2024 15:15:10 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2013 2:14:28 GMT -5
I'd say the Unification Match should happen before WM. There's no reason why it HAS to happen at WM. The WWF and WCW Titles were unified at a B-PPV, and WCW's version of the WHC was a much bigger deal than WWE's current incarnation.
They should either do it at
a.) TLC or even on the final RAW of 2013 as a way to end the year. b.) The First RAW of 2014 or the Royal Rumble as a way to start the year. c.) The Elimination Chamber in February should be Winner Take all for both titles. Maybe Cena vs. Punk vs. Bryan vs. Orton and then for the other two participants throw in either Miz/Del Rio/Ziggler/Sheamus/Kane/Big Show/Rhodes/Sandow, or even throw in a low card dark horse for the sake of having another moment like Santino in the 2012 Chamber.
This way the Royal Rumble Winner can get his title shot at WM, and we don't have to worry about the issue of him having to choose which title he goes after.
|
|
|
Post by Jack on Oct 31, 2013 2:47:04 GMT -5
I dig it. Would in turn put more value on the mid card titles.
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Oct 31, 2013 3:43:53 GMT -5
I could easily see it happen although I prefer it the way it is now.
|
|
|
Post by Edge618 on Oct 31, 2013 4:01:01 GMT -5
I wouldn't mind if they did it like they did at Vengeance 2001. Cena vs Bryan for the WHC, Punk vs Orton for the WWE Championship, and the winners of those face each other to unify, (Punk vs Bryan)
|
|
Ohtimate Wahriah
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
Joined on: Jul 1, 2008 12:35:07 GMT -5
Posts: 2,624
|
Post by Ohtimate Wahriah on Oct 31, 2013 11:51:23 GMT -5
I still would love to see a Title Unification Royal Rumble. You have both champions in the match, Winner is the unified champion. But to make it even more special, To even be IN the Rumble, You have to have been a WWE/Heavyweight champion yourself. So in my dream match you would have guys like Hogan & Warrior come out as surprise entrants, Guys who at this age cant really give us a great title match anymore, Still make an impact for a few minutes in a Rumble match. It would just be this all out war of the past and present all fighting for the biggest prize in the sport.
|
|
|
Post by HHH316 on Oct 31, 2013 12:00:16 GMT -5
I wouldn't be against it, but I can't see it happening.
|
|
|
Post by Punk on Oct 31, 2013 12:00:17 GMT -5
Jesus Christ, the 20th thread on this, this month.
Yes, I'd like it. IT's about time.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Bockwinkel on Oct 31, 2013 12:00:39 GMT -5
I wouldn't mind if they did it like they did at Vengeance 2001. Cena vs Bryan for the WHC, Punk vs Orton for the WWE Championship, and the winners of those face each other to unify, (Punk vs Bryan) Great idea
|
|
The Hitman
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 24, 2006 17:12:19 GMT -5
Posts: 2,377
|
Post by The Hitman on Oct 31, 2013 12:11:29 GMT -5
John Cena vs Randy Orton is the Rock vs Austin of this generation. I am all for a Unification Match at WM 30. I thought it became obvious on Monday, thats what they are going for. They can both say they won it the same night, and have the exact same amount of days as Champion. Sign me up.
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Oct 31, 2013 12:47:02 GMT -5
I voted "I Don't Care" cause I am sure that it will be Cena vs. Orton, so who cares?!?!
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Oct 31, 2013 13:01:17 GMT -5
No.
|
|
|
Post by Punk on Oct 31, 2013 13:05:42 GMT -5
What I said in the last thread on this topic a week ago, was 'We need to get rid of the Money in the Bank, THEN unify the titles.'
The money in the bank is lazy. Why can't we just push people properly into these spots instead of 'You won a match! Title Match for you!'
I hate this stupid 'Now the World title is the Hardcore Title! 24/7!'
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Oct 31, 2013 13:22:40 GMT -5
I'm not against it, unless it's Cena/Orton. I have absolutely no interest in seeing the two of them face off ever again, let alone in the main event of Wrestlemania. I can't even stand the thought of it.
|
|
|
Post by HVMMONS on Oct 31, 2013 13:23:11 GMT -5
I dig it. Would in turn put more value on the mid card titles. This. Also it would allow more feuds to spark that don't require a title to boost interest.
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Oct 31, 2013 14:04:34 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure the direction they are headed in is Orton vs Cena for the undisputed title at WM30
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Oct 31, 2013 14:11:52 GMT -5
I like the Vengeance 2001 style idea. One champ vs the Royal Rumble winner, one champ vs Elimination Chamber winner, then the winners face each other in the final.
So my WrestleMania 30 card would be:
WWE Champion DANIEL BRYAN vs CM PUNK World Champion JOHN CENA vs RANDY ORTON Unification match: JOHN CENA vs CM PUNK
The Streak vs The Beast: UNDERTAKER vs BROCK LESNAR
Battle for control of the company: SHAWN MICHAELS w/Mr McMahon vs TRIPLE H w/Stephanie
US Champion DEAN AMBROSE vs ROMAN REIGNS vs SETH ROLLINS Intercontinental Champion CODY RHODES vs GOLDUST BIG E LANGSTON, RVD and REY MYSTERIO vs THE WYATT FAMILY
Battle Royal for first shot at the Unified Champion: ALBERTO DEL RIO KOFI KINGSTON DOLPH ZIGGLER THE MIZ RYBACK FANDANGO KANE MARK HENRY BIG SHOW SHEAMUS
|
|
|
Post by Brad on Oct 31, 2013 14:13:37 GMT -5
I'd love to see this happen. I don't think it will though.
|
|