Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 16:02:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2013 20:56:45 GMT -5
Okay, so the dirtsheets report Lesnar vs Ryback at the Royal Rumble. But where's the logic in that? Are we supposed to believe Ryback, who lost to CM Punk in 4 minutes via submission can beat Brock Lesnar who beat CM Punk? Ryback could bring a shotgun, and even then I'd not believe for a second that Ryback could beat Brock. Where's the logic WWE?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 16:02:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2013 21:08:31 GMT -5
Goldberg is gonna return at rumble and interfere in the match making a triple threat match at WM 30.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Nov 15, 2013 21:11:22 GMT -5
Okay, so the dirtsheets report Lesnar vs Ryback at the Royal Rumble. But where's the logic in that? Are we supposed to believe Ryback, who lost to CM Punk in 4 minutes via submission can beat Brock Lesnar who beat CM Punk? Ryback could bring a shotgun, and even then I'd not believe for a second that Ryback could beat Brock. Where's the logic WWE? |
|
Mr. K.O
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 24, 2010 19:04:14 GMT -5
Posts: 4,094
|
Post by Mr. K.O on Nov 15, 2013 21:11:24 GMT -5
Key word though: Dirtsheets
|
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Nov 15, 2013 21:11:45 GMT -5
The current creative plan in WWE would see Heyman bring Brock Lesnar back to destroy Ryback, as Heyman would blame Ryback for CM Punk putting Heyman in a wheelchair. There's the logic in why they would feud And by Rumble time. ryback might be an unstoppable force again. Remember. A year before punk beat him in 5 mins on raw Punk couldn't beat him at all. Ryback wouldn't beat punk down and then get saved by sheild Brad Maddox etc. If we really sat here and dissected every scenreio like the one you just posted (how Brock beat punk but punk beat ryback) we would have a list as big as the  ing bible of match ups & outcomes without any "logic" |
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Nov 15, 2013 21:11:59 GMT -5
Wheres the logic in Sheamus beating Bryan in 18 seconds for WHC for Bryan to then beat Cena and Orton for the WWE title?
WWE Ladies and Gentlemen
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 16:02:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2013 21:12:27 GMT -5
Goldberg is gonna return at rumble and interfere in the match making a triple threat match at WM 30. BotchaMania will be all over that match if that's the case. We got a 50 year old with a ego beyond the moon, a MMA guy, and a walking botch fest. Monnnayyyyyy |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 16:02:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2013 21:15:16 GMT -5
The current creative plan in WWE would see Heyman bring Brock Lesnar back to destroy Ryback, as Heyman would blame Ryback for CM Punk putting Heyman in a wheelchair. There's the logic in why they would feud And by Rumble time. ryback might be an unstoppable force again. Remember. A year before punk beat him in 5 mins on raw Punk couldn't beat him at all. Ryback wouldn't beat punk down and then get saved by sheild Brad Maddox etc. If we really sat here and dissected every scenreio like the one you just posted (how Brock beat punk but punk beat ryback) we would have a list as big as the ing bible of match ups & outcomes without any "logic" It's too recent. When I watch Daniel Bryan I don't think "Oh he lost in 18 seconds at WrestleMania". When I watch Ryback now I think "This guy lost to CM Punk in just over 4 minutes. LOL" |
|
|
|
Post by Punk on Nov 15, 2013 21:19:39 GMT -5
You HAVE to stop reading Dirt Sheets. Every other post from you is a copy/paste from a dirtsheet. Just... Stop. Watch wrestling, come up with your own ideas.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 16:02:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2013 21:20:33 GMT -5
And more importantly, If now Brock faces Undertaker at WM. They have to book him strong. I don't concider Ryback strong competition anymore.
|
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Nov 15, 2013 21:27:58 GMT -5
And more importantly, If now Brock faces Undertaker at WM. They have to book him strong. I don't concider Ryback strong competition anymore. Okay dude no one does at the current moment but if he spends the next few months dominating everybody as a monster face like he was before, then maybe you'll see things differently. Stop jumping the ing gun. If Ambrose loses to Punk in 4 minutes sometime in the near future, would you stop taking him seriously ? |
|
|
|
Post by Turnbuckle Zealot(Phil) on Nov 15, 2013 21:39:28 GMT -5
Wrestling is the same as any combat sport, at the very least in this one truth. It's not about whose better in general, but who has their skit together on that given day, in those moments that make up that particular bout.
Then we remember that they are telling a story, & we are quickly reminded that ANY potential outcome could occur.
To conclude, this is a case-in-point example of how the phrases "Your Rear-End", & " The Dirt Sheets" are easily interchangeable as the closing section of the sentence "Get your head out of_____"...
|
|
MikeMillenium
Main Eventer
I LOVE THE WWE AND EVERYTHING ABOUT IT
Joined on: Jul 21, 2010 13:45:54 GMT -5
Posts: 1,622
|
Post by MikeMillenium on Nov 15, 2013 21:43:44 GMT -5
The only people who don't believe Ryback could beat Brock Lesnar are those who read into everything WWE does too deeply, scour the internet for wrestling news and keep mental win/loss records of every superstar. These poeple probably also overuse the term "buried" or "jobbed" as well.
It's all I really see on forums... Like damn as if any match on RAW goes longer than 5 minutes. As if WWE can't have Ryback run in, attack Lesnar, stand over him triumphantly and make it believable.
This isn't like WWE HCTP (I think) where the more often you lose the lower your Overall Stats fall... Wins and losses mean almost nothing in the WWE.
I hope some of you guys actually have fun when you go to the live shows...
|
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Nov 15, 2013 22:39:15 GMT -5
Wrestling is the same as any combat sport, at the very least in this one truth. It's not about whose better in general, but who has their skit together on that given day, in those moments that make up that particular bout. Then we remember that they are telling a story, & we are quickly reminded that ANY potential outcome could occur. To conclude, this is a case-in-point example of how the phrases "Your Rear-End", & " The Dirt Sheets" are easily interchangeable as the closing section of the sentence "Get your head out of_____"... "Anything can happen in the World Wrestling Federation!" |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 16:02:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2013 22:59:47 GMT -5
The current creative plan in WWE would see Heyman bring Brock Lesnar back to destroy Ryback, as Heyman would blame Ryback for CM Punk putting Heyman in a wheelchair. There's the logic in why they would feud And by Rumble time. ryback might be an unstoppable force again. Remember. A year before punk beat him in 5 mins on raw Punk couldn't beat him at all. Ryback wouldn't beat punk down and then get saved by sheild Brad Maddox etc. If we really sat here and dissected every scenreio like the one you just posted (how Brock beat punk but punk beat ryback) we would have a list as big as the ing bible of match ups & outcomes without any "logic" from a creative standpoint, why bother? lesnar is expensive for appearances & you want him to draw with a name that'll bring a profit does anyone other than ryback fans want to see that match? **nothing against ryback, I'm just surprised they're wasting an appearance on anything with someone below cena/taker/punk/hhh level guys |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 16:02:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2013 1:30:32 GMT -5
Okay, so the dirtsheets report Lesnar vs Ryback at the Royal Rumble. But where's the logic in that? Are we supposed to believe Ryback, who lost to CM Punk in 4 minutes via submission can beat Brock Lesnar who beat CM Punk? Ryback could bring a shotgun, and even then I'd not believe for a second that Ryback could beat Brock. Where's the logic WWE? MMA math, bro. Just because Fighter A beats Fighter B, it does't mean Fighter A can beat Fighter C who previously lost to Fighter B. It depends on skill sets and how certain types of fighters stack up against other types of fighters. I doubt that WWE put that much thought into the program. WWE doesn't tend to respect storytelling or cannon. Also, I want to see Goldberg at Wrestlemania. I would rather see a decent match w/ Lesnar than a triple threat or a match with Ryback though. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Nov 16, 2013 1:42:16 GMT -5
If we follow your logic then nobody should be able to beat anybody.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 16:02:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2013 8:17:42 GMT -5
What the hell will it take for WWE to give up on Ryback? How many bad performances is he allowed to have before they just pull the plug?
|
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Nov 16, 2013 18:49:14 GMT -5
Lesnar shouldn't be wasted on Ryback of all people. At least let Ryback rebuild himself for a year or two before wasting a big name on him. That would be like wasting Rock, HHH, Taker, Goldberg, HBK, Austin etc on Ryback when there's guys like Punk, Bryan, Orton, Cena etc.
|
|
Starscream
Superstar
"In my restless dreams. I see that town...."
Joined on: Sept 9, 2009 20:11:52 GMT -5
Posts: 544 
|
Post by Starscream on Nov 16, 2013 18:50:55 GMT -5
Seems you have not attended Scott Steiner's class, shame
|
|
