|
|
Post by FBtagteamsrule on Dec 15, 2013 22:55:21 GMT -5
only good match that actually seemed to advance a storyline was punk vs the shield. match caused more friction between ambrose and the others imo. otherwise boring ppv
|
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Dec 15, 2013 22:55:57 GMT -5
Why is it that Raw ends 15 minutes late and PPVs end 15 minutes early??? To even it out Lol |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 9:33:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2013 22:56:32 GMT -5
The PPV looked better on the card than what it was. Shield vs Punk and Orton vs Cena was the only entertaining ones. The rest was trying not to fall asleep material. I'd say it was a 6/10 because of that spear.
|
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Dec 15, 2013 22:57:20 GMT -5
How was this show horrible? They gave us some awesome matches... I didn't see a single match I'd classify as "awesome". It was a glorified Raw with an oversold main event that was mediocre, uneventful, and awkward. It was better than Battleground and Survivor Series, I'll give you that, but, that's saying absolutely nothing, because those two shows are among the absolute worst in over a decade worth of Pay-Per-Views. |
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Dec 15, 2013 22:57:30 GMT -5
Btw for what reason did that give us to watch raw tomorrow ? New title? At least we know the rumble will be good next month. |
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Dec 15, 2013 22:57:45 GMT -5
The face of the wwe
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Dec 15, 2013 22:59:01 GMT -5
At least we know the rumble will be good next month. ....but will it? |
|
|
|
Post by The Dazzler on Dec 15, 2013 22:59:33 GMT -5
Why do people say this after EVERY PPV? Unless this is the FIRST WWE PPV you've EVER watched, you'd know that every WWE PPV for the last like 20 years besides WM sometimes has ended at 10:40something....  ing Christ seriously. Is that actually true? I thought only the past 3-4 PPV's have ended 15 min early. The reason why people say that is because it's advertised to be from 5-8. Doesn't matter if every single PPV is ended 15 min early, if it's advertised to be in that time period, people will be curious. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 9:33:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2013 23:00:17 GMT -5
At least we know the rumble will be good next month. ....but will it? Sure it will be great, just like the last 5 PPVs........... |
|
Obi-TruLove
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 23, 2010 13:20:40 GMT -5
Posts: 1,938
|
Post by Obi-TruLove on Dec 15, 2013 23:01:30 GMT -5
Would it have hurt them to have a ing ladder match, tables match, or a ing CHAIRS match on the card? |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 9:33:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2013 23:01:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Dec 15, 2013 23:03:05 GMT -5
Would it have hurt them to have a ing ladder match, tables match, or a ing CHAIRS match on the card? Name of the PPV is TLC and they had a TLC match. And there was no reason for another ladder match. The other two maybe but chair matches are pointless. |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Dec 15, 2013 23:04:02 GMT -5
Would it have hurt them to have a ing ladder match, tables match, or a ing CHAIRS match on the card? Then we would all complain about overkill of gimmicks and how stupid a chair match is. |
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Dec 15, 2013 23:07:36 GMT -5
Punk/Shield match was terrific, Tag Match was great, and the Bryan/Wyatts match was very well done. The main event was pretty lame, but was expecting it to be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Epic Z on Dec 15, 2013 23:08:15 GMT -5
Tag match was good, Shield and Punk match was good, Wyatts vs Bryan was good, Cena and Orton was decent but a bit disappointing with a botched finish. All the other matches sucked. Also Cole said that this would be Cena's biggest win of his career.. Uh I think beating the Rock at WM 29 is 10x bigger. And they kept saying that it was the biggest match in the history of WWE am I the only one who thinks Rock/Hogan Rock/Austin Rock/Cena Taker/H HBK/Bret ETC was all MUCH bigger!?
All I have to say after watching this is:
TNA>WWE
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Dec 15, 2013 23:08:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Dec 15, 2013 23:09:29 GMT -5
Why is it that Raw ends 15 minutes late and PPVs end 15 minutes early??? I've never understood this either...They always end at :45, but the PPV is scheduled until the hour. Why not use the time? |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Dec 15, 2013 23:13:05 GMT -5
Why is it that Raw ends 15 minutes late and PPVs end 15 minutes early??? I've never understood this either...They always end at :45, but the PPV is scheduled until the hour. Why not use the time? Which matches would have gotten extra time? Too many matches to give each match 2 extra minutes. PPV companies cut off at 10:00. If they go over they are ed like WCW was. They'd rather cut it short than risk going long and people missing out. |
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Dec 15, 2013 23:13:53 GMT -5
At least the UK'ers got this for free... another meh PPV.
I hope we don't get Orton vs Sheamus @ WM. At any other PPV I wouldn't mind a face Sheamus vs a heel Orton but not at WM30 of all WMs. C'mon who the hell wants to see Orton vs Sheamus? Not even the casual fans would wanna see that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Dec 15, 2013 23:16:45 GMT -5
If there was literally anything else worthwhile to watch on Monday nights, I'd probably skip Raw... Guess I could go see Hobbit during that time frame.
|
|
