Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 7:26:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2014 23:45:17 GMT -5
I finally got a shelf.  Looks good. Where did you get the sheet metal from? |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Mar 15, 2014 23:47:51 GMT -5
That's true. Hey.. let's stick with the Dale at Daytona comparison. Okay? Kyle @ Bristol - 5 Wins in Sprint Cup | 7 Wins in Nationwide | 4 Wins in Truck Dale at @daytona - 3 Wins in Sprint Cup | 7 Wins in Nationwide. Boy.. strange how statics can work and show that - gasp - Kyle isn't the only one who has more wins in Nationwide at a certain track than in Cup. DISCLAIMER: THIS POST IS IN NO WAY COMPARING DALE AND KYLE'S CAREER. IT'S AN EXAMPLE OF NASCAR'S "WINS IN ALL THREE SERIES" STAT.
You are not making sense. Why bring Dale wins at Daytona into this. You implied Kyle Busch was better than Waltrip at Bristol. What does Dale stats have to do with that? Amyways... Waltrip>Busch No. I said that the numbers were debatable. They are because the argument against Kyle would have - and is - because (x) came in against inferior competition with inferior. That isn't an implication that someone is better than someone. It's saying that the comparison is debatable (12 vs. 16) and it's clearly debatable. Hence this discussion.. Also.. the post that you replied too was an explanation of the statistic that I was reference with Kyle's sixteen wins in all three series. Someone asked about the number of cup wins and I explained the statistic. You replied about how most of Kyle's wins came in the lower series which I replied about the same being true for Dale at Daytona. Why? To empshasis the statistic that this entire discussion started on - "The most wins at any track in all three national touring series". Wasn't about Darrell when you replied. It was about the statistic. I never said that was debatable. I said that Darrell's twelve wins being better than Kyle's sixteen was debatable which - in my opinion - it is. So.. everyone back off the ledge.
It kinda is though. DW's 12 wins are Sprint Cup level. Kyle has to do it over 2 levels [3 if he's won truck races which idk] Sigh. I don't understand why people don't understand what I'm saying. Whatever. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 7:26:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2014 23:52:55 GMT -5
You are not making sense. Why bring Dale wins at Daytona into this. You implied Kyle Busch was better than Waltrip at Bristol. What does Dale stats have to do with that? Amyways... Waltrip>Busch No. I said that the numbers were debatable. They are because the argument against Kyle would have - and is - because (x) came in against inferior competition with inferior. That isn't an implication that someone is better than someone. It's saying that the comparison is debatable (12 vs. 16) and it's clearly debatable. Hence this discussion.. Also.. the post that you replied too was an explanation of the statistic that I was reference with Kyle's sixteen wins in all three series. Someone asked about the number of cup wins and I explained the statistic. You replied about how most of Kyle's wins came in the lower series which I replied about the same being true for Dale at Daytona. Why? To empshasis the statistic that this entire discussion started on - "The most wins at any track in all three national touring series". Wasn't about Darrell when you replied. It was about the statistic. Guess I am dumb, I do not follow. Waltrip > Busch I do not want this thread locked again. Have the last laugh if you want, I am done. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 7:26:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2014 23:53:31 GMT -5
I finally got a shelf. Looks good. Where did you get the sheet metal from? I cut the son of a bitch off of Newman's car mid race during a pit stop. Nah, I got it from Stewie Haas Racing's shop. |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Mar 15, 2014 23:54:43 GMT -5
Why would the thread be locked again? We're have a discussion on a discussion forum. It's when the name calling begins that's the issue. :/
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 7:26:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2014 23:56:55 GMT -5
No. I said that the numbers were debatable. They are because the argument against Kyle would have - and is - because (x) came in against inferior competition with inferior. That isn't an implication that someone is better than someone. It's saying that the comparison is debatable (12 vs. 16) and it's clearly debatable. Hence this discussion.. Also.. the post that you replied too was an explanation of the statistic that I was reference with Kyle's sixteen wins in all three series. Someone asked about the number of cup wins and I explained the statistic. You replied about how most of Kyle's wins came in the lower series which I replied about the same being true for Dale at Daytona. Why? To empshasis the statistic that this entire discussion started on - "The most wins at any track in all three national touring series". Wasn't about Darrell when you replied. It was about the statistic. Guess I am dumb, I do not follow. Waltrip > Busch I do not want this thread locked again. Have the last laugh if you want, I am done. Kyle Busch is better than Darrell Waltrip because the will to win is greater than the skill to win. [/SickReferenceBro] |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 7:26:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2014 23:57:24 GMT -5
Why would the thread be locked again? We're have a discussion on a discussion forum. It's when the name calling begins that's the issue. :/ Just being cautious. But I really do not understand what you are trying to get across. Not trying to be rude or ignorant, but I just do not get it. Sorry. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 7:26:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2014 23:57:56 GMT -5
Guess I am dumb, I do not follow. Waltrip > Busch I do not want this thread locked again. Have the last laugh if you want, I am done. Kyle Busch is better than Darrell Waltrip because the will to win is greater than the skill to win. [/SickReferenceBro] BWHAHAHAHA. You got me, lol. (no sarcasm intended). |
|
|
|
Post by Duck Holliday on Mar 16, 2014 13:40:40 GMT -5
Bristol!
The rain delay gave me a chance to mess with my fantasy team.
|
|
|
|
Post by Last Trent Barreta Fan on Mar 16, 2014 17:48:27 GMT -5
During the rain delay I was bored so I randomly tweeted Rick Allen because he was answering tweets. I figured he wouldn't respond but  So I'm getting a hug from Rick Allen LMAO |
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Mar 16, 2014 17:54:39 GMT -5
They really should move the Bristol spring race. It seems like it ALWAYS rains either during Qualifying, Practice or a race. March/April just isnt a good time of year for Bristol
However, Wrestlemania at Bristol or Neyland Stadium would be awesome!
|
|
|
|
Post by Last Trent Barreta Fan on Mar 16, 2014 17:58:33 GMT -5
They really should move the Bristol spring race. It seems like it ALWAYS rains either during Qualifying, Practice or a race. March/April just isnt a good time of year for Bristol However, Wrestlemania at Bristol or Neyland Stadium would be awesome! If they booked a Wrestlemania at Bristol I'd be booking my tickets now |
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Mar 16, 2014 18:30:45 GMT -5
I would imagine Timmy Hill's Crew Chief is having this convo with him right now....
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 7:26:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2014 18:47:56 GMT -5
Timmy forgot this wasn't ARCA.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 7:26:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2014 19:31:53 GMT -5
Holy sugartits I hope Aric Armadillo wins.
|
|
|
|
Post by Duck Holliday on Mar 16, 2014 19:47:24 GMT -5
My fantasy team is F-ed... Go Harv!
|
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Mar 16, 2014 20:08:29 GMT -5
My fantasy team just went ka-pow. 18/4 where the top two leaving me the 55/13. LOL.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Mar 16, 2014 20:09:05 GMT -5
The only thing that can save this race now is for Smoke to win.
|
|
|
|
Post by Duck Holliday on Mar 16, 2014 20:10:39 GMT -5
My fantasy team just went ka-pow. 18/4 where the top two leaving me the 55/13. LOL. I had a very similar team. 4,18, 55 and I forget my other two |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Mar 16, 2014 20:19:18 GMT -5
My fantasy team just went ka-pow. 18/4 where the top two leaving me the 55/13. LOL. I had a very similar team. 4,18, 55 and I forget my other two I had Timmy Hill solely because he couldn't lose positions from the start (43rd). It sucks because the other plan was 99/14 as the top two. |
|
