Official Undertaker is 21/1 omg the streak ended hysteria

I'm upset the match was boring and poorly built. One second I switch to comment here and then I go back to watch WM and bam I see everyone's face. I literally thought Brock broke Taker's neck or something. I wanted Taker to go out with an epic battle. Now there's no point in having Sting at WM 31 imo.

The reason they chose Lesnar, a part-timer over a up and comer (or Cena) was because they didn't want that stress and weight on the shoulders of the guy that beat him. It was better to let somebody like Brock beat it, honestly.

Imagine the pressure that would have been on a guy like Reigns.

I would've liked
Sting, heel cena or even Wyatt to beat him next mania but I guess Brock did the impossible lol I'm still shocked. Oh well..

CM Punk. Roman Reigns. Bray Wyatt.

All three of those men would have been much better choices than Brock Lesnar to beat the Streak. Not only was the choice of having Brock win terrible, the match itself was a bore. Shield's two minute squash was more entertaining than that.

That was the worst thing for business. It ruined the Taker's whole allure as well as a huge part of WrestleMania's mystique. 22-0 would have meant something. 21-1 means nothing. Personally now I feel the 1 in place of a 0 in the loss column tarnishes his whole WM legacy. The streak should have never been broken. It was the one blemish on an otherwise entertaining WM.

Terrible build, terrible match, and terrible result. One of the only black spots (the only other, much smaller one being Cena going over Bray) on an otherwise fantastic Wrestlemania.

I think no one, not even the commentators knew about it. I think Undertaker may have told Vince and the graphics guy, but no one else.

If you guys didn't like the actual match, what makes you think next year would be better?

I mean, the fans were so dead because they know how a Taker Wrestlemania match goes. The first 5 finishing moves hit never mean the end of the match.

As far as it being Brock Lesnar winning, I'm all for it. I'd rather have a titan conquer Undertaker than someone who doesn't have a proven track record. I mean yeah I wish Brock wasn't part time, but Roman Reigns? Him breaking the streak just doesn't sound right. CM Punk, okay I would've loved that. Cena, as much as everyone is saying he would've been better I KNOW if it actually happened everyone would complain. So Brock isn't such a bad choice in my eyes.

I just wish they built Brock as more of an underdog. Paul Heyman basically told us Brock was going to end Taker, and he did. It's more of a statement, but not so much wow factor or emotions invested there. Anyways, I'm all for it. It finally gives me the courage to end Undertaker's streak myself in WWE 2k14.

Maybe taker decided to end his career legit on his terms and decided that if he was having a bad match he was taking the fall. I wouldn't doubt it if Taker based staying around on weather or not the crowd was loving his matches.