|
Post by FBtagteamsrule on Apr 27, 2014 18:32:53 GMT -5
does ambrose even carry it anymore?
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Apr 27, 2014 19:31:27 GMT -5
I didnt even know WWE still had a US Title anymore. I figured they just dissolved it. I thought they pulled what TNA did with their TV Title and just forget they had a US Title. I hope somehow Ambrose loses the title, unless they continue the Shield and Evolution storyline and a way to further build the storyline is to have Dean Ambrose defend the US Title in a gauntlet against the people they've been feeding the Shield for the past few weeks. Exactly what I was thinking. WWE copying TNA again....
|
|
Dudewithattitude83
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
Joined on: Dec 18, 2001 15:13:21 GMT -5
Posts: 3,954
|
Post by Dudewithattitude83 on Apr 28, 2014 0:25:19 GMT -5
i say give it to someone who is not involved with a huge storyline right now so it can be defended
|
|
Mr. K.O
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 24, 2010 19:04:14 GMT -5
Posts: 4,094
|
Post by Mr. K.O on Apr 28, 2014 0:49:52 GMT -5
You guys are so dumb do you not follow the WWE product? Dean Ambrose doesn't defend his title because everyone is too afraid to challenge him for it cause the Shield is so dominant? It's funny lol cause I want him to be the longest reigning champion in the history of a US Title cause he deserves it granted they could make him defend it more but how is he gonna defend it if everyone afraid of The Shield huh? ? Answer that crybaby whiners!! #BelieveInTheShield Well, think about it from a storyline standpoint. Triple H is a powerful figure. And as a powerful figure, he can do whatever he wants. So why not make Ambrose defend it in challenging situations? Why not have him defend the title in gauntlet or multi-men matches? You said no one wants to challenge him because they're afraid of The Shield's dominance. Simple solution: ban Rollins and Reigns from ringside and if they interfere in any way, Ambrose loses the title. If it's going to be like this, at least make it a big story, which I hope they have the sense to do. The fact that the title hasn't been defended, let alone even carried around often enough is pretty stupid. And this is coming from a huge Shield/Ambrose fan.
|
|
|
Post by BCizzle on Apr 28, 2014 0:56:52 GMT -5
This is just another fail by creative. Sad.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 30, 2024 12:30:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2014 2:33:03 GMT -5
You guys are so dumb do you not follow the WWE product? Dean Ambrose doesn't defend his title because everyone is too afraid to challenge him for it cause the Shield is so dominant? It's funny lol cause I want him to be the longest reigning champion in the history of a US Title cause he deserves it granted they could make him defend it more but how is he gonna defend it if everyone afraid of The Shield huh? ? Answer that crybaby whiners!! #BelieveInTheShield Well, think about it from a storyline standpoint. Triple H is a powerful figure. And as a powerful figure, he can do whatever he wants. So why not make Ambrose defend it in challenging situations? Why not have him defend the title in gauntlet or multi-men matches? You said no one wants to challenge him because they're afraid of The Shield's dominance. Simple solution: ban Rollins and Reigns from ringside and if they interfere in any way, Ambrose loses the title. If it's going to be like this, at least make it a big story, which I hope they have the sense to do. The fact that the title hasn't been defended, let alone even carried around often enough is pretty stupid. And this is coming from a huge Shield/Ambrose fan. The title is taking a backseat to well we are Evolution uou are The Shield so idk it's cool as a Shield fan Ambrose keeps the title without defending it and now the roster gets taken out by the shield so idk it's awesome hahha
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 30, 2024 12:30:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2014 2:42:27 GMT -5
There was a another one against Henry on Main Event. Still, it doesn't help much. Ah, yeah! So it is ten overall. I wonder when was the last time that someone was an active champion for a year and defended the title ten times or less on TV/PPV... Hogan in between WrestleMania V and VI, maybe? If we're going old school kayfabe here, the champion only has to defend the title 1 time in a month. I'm pretty sure that house shows count, so, strictly speaking, Ambrose is just using his championship advantage. Seriously. I'm happy that Ambrose is 3rd on the all time list. I honestly hope that he breaks Luger's longevity record. Hopefully he will have a more eventful reign from this point forward though.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 30, 2024 12:30:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2014 3:56:38 GMT -5
Ah, yeah! So it is ten overall. I wonder when was the last time that someone was an active champion for a year and defended the title ten times or less on TV/PPV... Hogan in between WrestleMania V and VI, maybe? If we're going old school kayfabe here, the champion only has to defend the title 1 time in a month. I'm pretty sure that house shows count, so, strictly speaking, Ambrose is just using his championship advantage. Seriously. I'm happy that Ambrose is 3rd on the all time list. I honestly hope that he breaks Luger's longevity record. Hopefully he will have a more eventful reign from this point forward though. I really hope he beats the Luger record
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 30, 2024 12:30:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2014 4:06:54 GMT -5
You guys are so dumb do you not follow the WWE product? Cool it with the name calling. Just because others opinions don't match yours exactly doesn't mean anyone is "dumb".
|
|
kuleo16
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Feb 11, 2014 17:31:17 GMT -5
Posts: 204
|
Post by kuleo16 on Apr 28, 2014 4:17:32 GMT -5
Ambrose will lose his title to none other than Kurt Angle when he comes back later this year in August to WWE, but thats wishful thinking lol. The US belt would look nice on Angle though.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 30, 2024 12:30:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2014 4:30:34 GMT -5
You guys are so dumb do you not follow the WWE product? Cool it with the name calling. Just because others opinions don't match yours exactly doesn't mean anyone is "dumb". They already explained his title reign and why he doesn't defend it it's not an opinion it's fact they mentioned it at least twice on wwe television. Sorry it just bugs me
|
|
|
Post by James on Apr 28, 2014 4:44:31 GMT -5
I just think the title is in the wrong hands.
Ambrose had his fame, so did the other 2 with the tag titles. It should have been passed on months ago. Hell, they could give it to Cesaro or someone.
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Apr 28, 2014 6:20:55 GMT -5
Ah, yeah! So it is ten overall. I wonder when was the last time that someone was an active champion for a year and defended the title ten times or less on TV/PPV... Hogan in between WrestleMania V and VI, maybe? If we're going old school kayfabe here, the champion only has to defend the title 1 time in a month. I'm pretty sure that house shows count, so, strictly speaking, Ambrose is just using his championship advantage. He doesn't defend it that often on house shows either. His last title defence was a four-way over Kofi, Cody and Ziggler on the 18th of this month... Before that, it was against Henry on Main Event on March 11th. He didn't defend it at all between December 8th and January 25th, either. Although if the rule is just once in each calendar month rather than every 30 days, he's golden.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 30, 2024 12:30:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2014 6:48:22 GMT -5
Longest reign. Worst reign.
Get rid of that useless title.
|
|
|
Post by Midnight on Apr 28, 2014 12:27:34 GMT -5
Ambrose is truly awesome but he should have had more memorable feuds to help make that title credible.
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Apr 28, 2014 12:34:07 GMT -5
Shouldve lost it when Reigns/Rollins lost the tag titles. He has done absolutely crap with it since then. Obviously he is above the us title now and getting beat for it by some low midcarder for it would hurt Shield as a whole, Especially since they are now feuding with 3 top stars in Evolution and have been involved in the main event scene for a bit now. So having US title matches would be like 10 steps backwards for him.
He should just forfeit the title and move on.
|
|
jakksking1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 2, 2011 14:45:41 GMT -5
Posts: 2,843
|
Post by jakksking1 on Apr 28, 2014 12:44:02 GMT -5
If he was still heel, he would cut some amazing promos about his legendary title run
|
|