Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 9:33:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 19:47:40 GMT -5
MITB is right around the corner and the titles have ben unified so does this mean only one briefcase match? Or do you think thew will split them before mitb? Mitb is my favorite ppv and i'd hate to see only one briefcase match, well one is better then none, leave your thoughts down below  |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 9:33:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 19:48:54 GMT -5
I'm thinking this- 1 mitb match for the title, one for the briefcase
|
|
|
|
Post by The Natural Eddy Valintino on May 20, 2014 20:00:08 GMT -5
One Money in the Bank Ladder match is fine. All they need to do is put the right people to put on an amazing entertaining ladder match. We don't need two MITB ladder matches. One is fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by jayrod2009 on May 20, 2014 20:05:19 GMT -5
MITB 2014- Cesaro, Kingston, RVD, Cena, Langston, and Ziggler. 'Make it happen.
Spots:
Kingston flipping at Cesaro into a capture duplex.
Cena going for AA into a Cesaro Eruopean uppercut falling into the Zig Zag.
Frog splash off ladder.
Sunset flip off ladder to Cesaro, countered into Cesaro finisher.
Langston show of strength!!!
Kingston mega spot.
Cesaro ladder swing.
I think all 6 men could put on a hell of a show.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 9:33:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 20:12:50 GMT -5
I think the whole show should be dedicated to Ladder Matches IMO.
An Original Money in the Bank Match
An Intercontinental and US Money In the The Bank match for the title
A Tag Team Money in the Bank Match for the Tag Team Titles
And the First Ever Divas Ladder Match for the Title.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 9:33:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 20:16:35 GMT -5
I think the whole show should be dedicated to Ladder Matches IMO. An Original Money in the Bank Match An Intercontinental and US Money In the The Bank match for the title A Tag Team Money in the Bank Match for the Tag Team TitlesAnd the First Ever Divas Ladder Match for the Title. I thought of the same thing earlier. Usos, Rybaxel, Rhodes,?. |
|
|
|
Post by Matt on May 20, 2014 20:29:06 GMT -5
I'm thinking this- 1 mitb match for the title, one for the briefcase I like the way you think.  |
|
|
|
Post by Ian from 616Entertainment. on May 20, 2014 20:41:52 GMT -5
They are never going to split the titles.
They wouldn't have put them together if they were going to split them back up.
|
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on May 20, 2014 20:48:07 GMT -5
I'd say quality not quantity. I loved the MITB concept and dont want it to tire. Give us a 6-8man MITB match with excellent in ring competition and be done with it. Maybe include one other ladder match on the show but just for one of the championships. That would suffice.
Plus, MITB has become known for have pretty awesome standard matches outside MITB, no need to throw the stipulation in every match.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 9:33:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 21:13:00 GMT -5
I'm thinking this- 1 mitb match for the title, one for the briefcase I like the way you think. Thank you, take this al bundy gif as my way of thanks  |
|
|
|
Post by HHH316 on May 20, 2014 21:13:47 GMT -5
I think the whole show should be dedicated to Ladder Matches IMO. An Original Money in the Bank Match An Intercontinental and US Money In the The Bank match for the title A Tag Team Money in the Bank Match for the Tag Team Titles And the First Ever Divas Ladder Match for the Title. The problem with this is it would be overkill. TNA proved that to be possible with their Lockdown shows. It should only be one MITB match. That's all that's needed with one title. |
|
|
|
Post by The Natural Eddy Valintino on May 20, 2014 21:15:49 GMT -5
I'd say quality not quantity. I loved the MITB concept and dont want it to tire. Give us a 6-8man MITB match with excellent in ring competition and be done with it. Maybe include one other ladder match on the show but just for one of the championships. That would suffice. Plus, MITB has become known for have pretty awesome standard matches outside MITB, no need to throw the stipulation in every match. Exactly, we don't need more than one Money in the Bank Ladder match. We need a good 6-8 guys, I'd prefer 8 in my opinion, that could perform and put on an entertaining match. The rest of the card should be World Title match, a couple feud matches, a couple title matches. We don't need 3-4 ladder matches to put on a good show. One ladder match is enough. We don't need one for the IC Title, for the US Title, for the Tag titles, for the Divas title, we all know WWE barely cares about any of those titles anyways. Just give me one amazing Ladder match, great IC/Tag Team title matches, a great World Title match, and you have yourself a great Money in the Bank PPV. |
|
|
|
Post by Rontaro13 on May 20, 2014 21:19:31 GMT -5
Two MITB Ladder Matches, both briefcases are for the one WWE World Heavyweight Championship. So the champion has to worry about TWO people cashing in the briefcases.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 9:33:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 21:21:56 GMT -5
Two MITB Ladder Matches, both briefcases are for the one WWE World Heavyweight Championship. So the champion has to worry about TWO people cashing in the briefcases. that is a pretty cool idea |
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on May 20, 2014 21:22:42 GMT -5
Having two money in the bank matches kinda watered it down. One of them was always better than the other. I would just hope we get an interesting crop involved, not Orton/Cena/Batista/Kane. I also don't want Cesaro to win it cause I want his first title reign to be legit.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 9:33:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 22:09:35 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 9:33:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 22:11:13 GMT -5
They are never going to split the titles. They wouldn't have put them together if they were going to split them back up.  I love the MITB, I wouldn't mind one for the IC title. |
|
|
|
Post by J12 on May 20, 2014 22:24:36 GMT -5
Like the other gimmick Pay-Per-Views, I presume they will cut down the number of matches to one, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, though it makes the concept of gimmick events even more useless.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 9:33:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 22:36:10 GMT -5
Like the other gimmick Pay-Per-Views, I presume they will cut down the number of matches to one, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, though it makes the concept of gimmick events even more useless. this |
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on May 20, 2014 22:37:35 GMT -5
I'm thinking this- 1 mitb match for the title, one for the briefcase Sounds pretty good to me at this point. Abeyance goes over at Payback and then crown a new Champ at MITB. |
|
