|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Oct 2, 2014 13:25:40 GMT -5
Yeah, make it a triple threat. Now ask yourself, who would The Undertaker go against? Face facts people, a triple threat match with Triple H, The Rock, and Steve Austin was meant not to take place. I'm not saying that I didn't enjoy the way it went. Taker vs Triple H was a great match. But I believe the topic was about Triple H vs Rock vs Austin, and I personally think that would have been a great WM main event. And looking back, the best set up for it would have been going into WM17 IMO. Without dissecting the entire card I'm sure they would have found Taker an opponent. With a few things changed, he could have faced Angle, Benoit, Jericho, or Guerrero. All four are guys Taker never faced at WM and all would have helped him put on a great match. We're all just fantasy booking here, no point in taking it so seriously. Let's dissect this here: - Both Kurt Angle and Chris Benoit were too busy wanting to be who is the best submission based wrestler - Chris Jericho and William Regal were busy with their own stuff - Eddie Guerrero, not a chance. By default, the only guy who you could have paired The Undertaker with is Triple H. I should mention that Steve Austin stated he isn't a big fan of triple threat matches. Face it, Triple H/The Rock/Steve Austin in one match was something people wanted to see but the "wrestling gods" didn't want to see that. At this juncture of 'Taker's career, he wasn't putting on stellar matches. 'Taker didn't begin to have good matches after he dropped in weight and had his heel run in 2001-2002. In all, Vince McMahon wanted to have Steve Austin and The Rock headline WrestleMania X-Seven and that is what we got. |
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Oct 2, 2014 14:27:28 GMT -5
I'm not saying that I didn't enjoy the way it went. Taker vs Triple H was a great match. But I believe the topic was about Triple H vs Rock vs Austin, and I personally think that would have been a great WM main event. And looking back, the best set up for it would have been going into WM17 IMO. Without dissecting the entire card I'm sure they would have found Taker an opponent. With a few things changed, he could have faced Angle, Benoit, Jericho, or Guerrero. All four are guys Taker never faced at WM and all would have helped him put on a great match.
We're all just fantasy booking here, no point in taking it so seriously. Let's dissect this here: - Both Kurt Angle and Chris Benoit were too busy wanting to be who is the best submission based wrestler - Chris Jericho and William Regal were busy with their own stuff - Eddie Guerrero, not a chance. By default, the only guy who you could have paired The Undertaker with is Triple H. I should mention that Steve Austin stated he isn't a big fan of triple threat matches. Face it, Triple H/The Rock/Steve Austin in one match was something people wanted to see but the "wrestling gods" didn't want to see that. At this juncture of 'Taker's career, he wasn't putting on stellar matches. 'Taker didn't begin to have good matches after he dropped in weight and had his heel run in 2001-2002. In all, Vince McMahon wanted to have Steve Austin and The Rock headline WrestleMania X-Seven and that is what we got. Please read the bolded/red/underlined part. |
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Oct 2, 2014 14:30:02 GMT -5
Let's dissect this here: - Both Kurt Angle and Chris Benoit were too busy wanting to be who is the best submission based wrestler - Chris Jericho and William Regal were busy with their own stuff - Eddie Guerrero, not a chance. By default, the only guy who you could have paired The Undertaker with is Triple H. I should mention that Steve Austin stated he isn't a big fan of triple threat matches. Face it, Triple H/The Rock/Steve Austin in one match was something people wanted to see but the "wrestling gods" didn't want to see that. At this juncture of 'Taker's career, he wasn't putting on stellar matches. 'Taker didn't begin to have good matches after he dropped in weight and had his heel run in 2001-2002. In all, Vince McMahon wanted to have Steve Austin and The Rock headline WrestleMania X-Seven and that is what we got. Please read the bolded/red/underlined part. I am not blind buddy. I did read what you bold and underlined part. |
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Oct 2, 2014 14:39:42 GMT -5
Please read the bolded/red/underlined part. I am not blind buddy. I did read what you bold and underlined part. Color me surprised, cause you seem to be taking a simple comment far too serious. Are you planning on telling the others how wrong they were for wanting this match? Triple H & Taker was thrown together in a few short weeks before WM. I'm sure they could have done something similar with anyone else. But since we can't time travel or read minds, I guess we'll never know. I apologize greatly for playing along with the others. |
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Oct 2, 2014 19:22:53 GMT -5
I am not blind buddy. I did read what you bold and underlined part. Color me surprised, cause you seem to be taking a simple comment far too serious. Are you planning on telling the others how wrong they were for wanting this match? Triple H & Taker was thrown together in a few short weeks before WM. I'm sure they could have done something similar with anyone else. But since we can't time travel or read minds, I guess we'll never know. I apologize greatly for playing along with the others. I will state that fantasy booking happens to be serious business here at WrestlingFigs. I see nothing wrong with wanting to see a Triple Threat match between The Rock, Steve Austin, and Triple H. It is the time period that come claim it would have made sense to do it. Wrestling is full of thousands of what if scenarios. This is where people decide to play the game of fantasy booker. One needs to factor in the realistic approach given. I don't mind people playing the role of a fantasy booker, I'd enjoy it what they have to say given the realistic approach. No need to apologize, we are imperfect humans who wake up in the AM, do what we gotta do, and sleep in the PM. |
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Oct 2, 2014 19:27:05 GMT -5
Color me surprised, cause you seem to be taking a simple comment far too serious. Are you planning on telling the others how wrong they were for wanting this match? Triple H & Taker was thrown together in a few short weeks before WM. I'm sure they could have done something similar with anyone else. But since we can't time travel or read minds, I guess we'll never know. I apologize greatly for playing along with the others. I will state that fantasy booking happens to be serious business here at WrestlingFigs. I see nothing wrong with wanting to see a Triple Threat match between The Rock, Steve Austin, and Triple H. It is the time period that come claim it would have made sense to do it. Wrestling is full of thousands of what if scenarios. This is where people decide to play the game of fantasy booker. One needs to factor in the realistic approach given. I don't mind people playing the role of a fantasy booker, I'd enjoy it what they have to say given the realistic approach. No need to apologize, we are imperfect humans who wake up in the AM, do what we gotta do, and sleep in the PM. Ok. |
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Oct 2, 2014 19:57:35 GMT -5
This got way too serious for no reason. Fantasy booking is...spoiler alert...fantasy.
I personally would've loved a Triple Threat and don't think it was out of the question. Obviously others do.
To answer the OP, yes it could've happened.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 22, 2024 12:01:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2014 20:01:02 GMT -5
I would've liked to see it.
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Oct 2, 2014 20:06:27 GMT -5
This got way too serious for no reason. Fantasy booking is...spoiler alert...fantasy.
I personally would've loved a Triple Threat and don't think it was out of the question. Obviously others do. To answer the OP, yes it could've happened.  |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 22, 2024 12:01:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2014 20:20:13 GMT -5
Wrestlemania 2000 would've been a good time had Austin not been injured.
|
|
underjohngrohs
Main Eventer
"Do I Have Everybody's Attention Now?"
Joined on: May 19, 2012 17:48:25 GMT -5
Posts: 2,959
|
Post by underjohngrohs on Oct 2, 2014 23:52:32 GMT -5
You Think, Bashcrash Wiley. Austin vs Show at WrestleMania 2000 was the original plan before Austin got run over. Here's another note. Chyna was planned to beat Austin at Summerslam 1999 that would be embarrassing if that were to happen, having a woman win the WWF Championship. Chyna had potential man.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 22, 2024 12:01:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2014 9:39:06 GMT -5
Color me surprised, cause you seem to be taking a simple comment far too serious. Are you planning on telling the others how wrong they were for wanting this match? Triple H & Taker was thrown together in a few short weeks before WM. I'm sure they could have done something similar with anyone else. But since we can't time travel or read minds, I guess we'll never know. I apologize greatly for playing along with the others. I will state that fantasy booking happens to be serious business here at WrestlingFigs. I see nothing wrong with wanting to see a Triple Threat match between The Rock, Steve Austin, and Triple H. It is the time period that come claim it would have made sense to do it. Wrestling is full of thousands of what if scenarios. This is where people decide to play the game of fantasy booker. One needs to factor in the realistic approach given. I don't mind people playing the role of a fantasy booker, I'd enjoy it what they have to say given the realistic approach. No need to apologize, we are imperfect humans who wake up in the AM, do what we gotta do, and sleep in the PM. Serious business and fantasy booking concerning pro wrestling don't belong in the same sentence together and likely never will to any rational people. I despair over what happened to this thread. |
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Oct 3, 2014 10:10:49 GMT -5
I will state that fantasy booking happens to be serious business here at WrestlingFigs. I see nothing wrong with wanting to see a Triple Threat match between The Rock, Steve Austin, and Triple H. It is the time period that come claim it would have made sense to do it. Wrestling is full of thousands of what if scenarios. This is where people decide to play the game of fantasy booker. One needs to factor in the realistic approach given. I don't mind people playing the role of a fantasy booker, I'd enjoy it what they have to say given the realistic approach. No need to apologize, we are imperfect humans who wake up in the AM, do what we gotta do, and sleep in the PM. Serious business and fantasy booking concerning pro wrestling don't belong in the same sentence together and likely never will to any rational people. I despair over what happened to this thread. It is a good thing the level of oxygen is very high in this thread. It would be a big case of injustice if no oxygen was present. We can all agree that Triple H, The Rock, and Steve Austin could have had a good match. Given how all three of them were at the top of their game and who were viewed as A+ talent. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 22, 2024 12:01:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2014 10:42:35 GMT -5
Serious business and fantasy booking concerning pro wrestling don't belong in the same sentence together and likely never will to any rational people. I despair over what happened to this thread. It is a good thing the level of oxygen is very high in this thread. It would be a big case of injustice if no oxygen was present. We can all agree that Triple H, The Rock, and Steve Austin could have had a good match. Given how all three of them were at the top of their game and who were viewed as A+ talent. Oxygen....yeah. Ok. getting back on topic I would have liked this 3 way @ WM17. I hate Austin's turn @ WM17 with a fiery passion. Not as much as his turn @ Invasion though. |
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Oct 3, 2014 10:51:50 GMT -5
It is a good thing the level of oxygen is very high in this thread. It would be a big case of injustice if no oxygen was present. We can all agree that Triple H, The Rock, and Steve Austin could have had a good match. Given how all three of them were at the top of their game and who were viewed as A+ talent. Oxygen....yeah. Ok. getting back on topic I would have liked this 3 way @ WM17. I hate Austin's turn @ WM17 with a fiery passion. Not as much as his turn @ Invasion though. I do like @bashcrashwiley's idea of doing the match a year earlier. Triple H was at the top of his game in work rate in 2000. As was The Rock. As for Steve Austin, who knows. Had it taken place at WrestleMania 2000 with Triple H getting the pin on Steve Austin, I think it would have made Triple H even more hated than ever before. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 22, 2024 12:01:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2014 10:51:56 GMT -5
You Think, Bashcrash Wiley. Austin vs Show at WrestleMania 2000 was the original plan before Austin got run over. Here's another note. Chyna was planned to beat Austin at Summerslam 1999 that would be embarrassing if that were to happen, having a woman win the WWF Championship. Chyna had potential man. I never heard that Chyna garbage before. Yeah, I think Wrestlemania 2000 would've been perfect had Austin been healthy. Big Show could have went up against Undertaker or something (if he was healthy too). I hated the Fatal 4 Way "McMahon in every corner" crap and don't feel like Mick Foley should've been brought back for that match. Foley had retired the month prior and should've stayed gone. Foley has even said that himself. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 22, 2024 12:01:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2014 10:57:56 GMT -5
Chyna beating Austin in 1999.....as a serious booking plan?
to that I say
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 22, 2024 12:01:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2014 11:00:13 GMT -5
Oxygen....yeah. Ok. getting back on topic I would have liked this 3 way @ WM17. I hate Austin's turn @ WM17 with a fiery passion. Not as much as his turn @ Invasion though. I do like @bashcrashwiley's idea of doing the match a year earlier. Triple H was at the top of his game in work rate in 2000. As was The Rock. As for Steve Austin, who knows. Had it taken place at WrestleMania 2000 with Triple H getting the pin on Steve Austin, I think it would have made Triple H even more hated than ever before. Yeah.....but then we wouldn't have received the FANTASTIC main event from Backlash 2000 really.....that whole thing was perfect. It had EVERYTHING. |
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Oct 3, 2014 11:09:38 GMT -5
I do like @bashcrashwiley's idea of doing the match a year earlier. Triple H was at the top of his game in work rate in 2000. As was The Rock. As for Steve Austin, who knows. Had it taken place at WrestleMania 2000 with Triple H getting the pin on Steve Austin, I think it would have made Triple H even more hated than ever before. Yeah.....but then we wouldn't have received the FANTASTIC main event from Backlash 2000 really.....that whole thing was perfect. It had EVERYTHING. Backlash 2000 is what WrestleMania 2000's main event should have been. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 22, 2024 12:01:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2014 11:21:56 GMT -5
I'm in full agreement with Backlash 2000.
|
|
