Should Cena break Flair's record?

lolnope. I understand that to angry teens, CENA SUX and is RUINING DA BIZ, but in reality, he's made WWE more money than any other talent. His years (prior to big network spending) were always way more profitable than Hogan's, and he had way more years than Austin and Rock. They're losing cash now because of how much they've spent on the flop of the network, but the third and fourth most profitable years in the company's existence were 2009 and 2010 -- who was the top star those years?

If the criteria for someone being bad is that they haven't increased numbers (presumably the growth you're referring to is domestic TV ratings, PPV buys, merchandise and tickets) on the previous generation, then pretty much everyone in the last thirty years except Hogan, Rock and Austin is bad.

Don't take this seriously but isn't it insane to think one of the biggest superstars of all time wore jorts, sneakers,and over sized shirts his entire career? Ha.

Like I know right? It's soooo weird when you think about it.

Hell, in ten years, we might be able to add a guy wearing Hardy Boyz pants and a Bane vest to that.

The most insane thing is that the biggest star ever (not counting longevity) wore plain black trunks and black boots. AND the biggest star on the other channel at the time wore the same thing!

Wow. Never thought about that. Both guys wore the same thing and both guys where bald and had goatees.

Cena's positioning as the guy us whiney internet fans want to see get beaten by our latest darling isn't a coincidence -- if you think you get into Cena vs Darling feuds in spite of Cena rather than because of him, you're being worked. He's kind of doing the same deal as Punk in UFC, there are people who want to see him get knocked out and people who want to see him succeed. Playing both sides of the fence.

As great as Cena is, he can't spin his ten millionth feud with Big Show into anything decent, and I'd rather he not try. Any effort put into a Cena vs Big Show feud, either by the talent or creative (like the time WWE tried to spin one of Show's turns on him as the most shocking thing in WWE history that the entire universe was tweeting about it), it just comes off worse. Cena did manage to make his unification match with Orton mean something though with his promos building that, despite it being their 40395768584393490th match and nobody looking forward to it. In any storyline that's even slightly worth it (and fairly often even when it isn't), he delivers the goods more consistently than anyone.

I agree. The dude is consistent and I've gone on record saying that nobody delivers in big match situations better than him. Not a single person. I understand that his booking isn't a coincidence. Though to be honest, was invested in nearly every feud Punk or Bryan had and it's not because they're darlings, it's just because they were more entertaining to me. Dolph is a darling that I enjoy, but I haven't liked every feud he's been part of. I appreciate John Cena and enjoy some of his stuff, but his character is incredibly stale and I wish he added some depth. I'm not one for the "OMG HE NEEDZ TO TURN HEEL TO BE COOL" thoughts, but I'd like to see some depth.

In the end, my biggest gripe with John Cena is that he doesn't seem to take any feud seriously. I get that Bray Wyatt didn't have to actually change anything about him but he made Bray look terrible by being seemingly affected by the kids singing around the ring, to laughing about Bray later in the night. Just little things like that hurt. If he took things more seriously, I'd be pretty damn fine with him.

Flairs title reigns are more meaningful than Cena, even Hogans reigns are more meaningful. they were defending at big events 4-6 times a year in the 80's. defending every month on ppv and on tv every so often loses credibility of the belt. RVD's ECW TV title reign is more meaningful than Cenas title reigns. I stll Flair consider the best world champion

He definitely will.