|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Feb 9, 2015 17:47:19 GMT -5
I like Roman but he doesn't have "it" - yet. If he had "it," he could string two sentences together without sounding like an idiot (this may be a problem of WWE's scripting, I admit). Rusev has not been pinned or made to submit in over a year, but that doesn't mean the WWE has told a story justifying him entering the main event of the biggest event of the year. Like I said, I don't think people dislike Roman specifically (I know I don't), they just don't like that fact that WWE doesn't give us a reason to believe he's "the guy." They can tell us he is, but they haven't shown us. That's storytelling 101. It's the exact same thing with Batista. Even from the outside, it seems odd that he just got shotgunned into that spot without any build-up to it. If Roman had stayed healthy all year, I have no doubt he would have been on Team Cena and done Ziggler's role at Survivor Series, he would have feuded with the Authority and built up to the spot. But he wasn't, and he didn't. Which is the point I'm trying to make. "It" is something you either have, or don't. You don't learn it. Roman has "it". Considering his injury, they've done a fine job building him. The execution of the Rumble was piss poor, but that doesn't mean Roman isn't ready. He is. We'll have to agree to disagree cause obviously we only see things the way we want to see them... |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 22:38:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2015 18:21:40 GMT -5
So the most popular and consistent performer in the company will probably headline the biggest show of the year? Way for WWE to really get crazy. This never should have been the ordeal that it became. Bryan should have been the guy since day 1. silly me, thought that was Dolph Ziggler |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 22:38:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2015 18:39:41 GMT -5
So the most popular and consistent performer in the company will probably headline the biggest show of the year? Way for WWE to really get crazy. This never should have been the ordeal that it became. Bryan should have been the guy since day 1. silly me, thought that was Dolph Ziggler Neither is wrong. #1 and 2 I'd say. |
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Feb 9, 2015 18:52:53 GMT -5
So the most popular and consistent performer in the company will probably headline the biggest show of the year? Way for WWE to really get crazy. This never should have been the ordeal that it became. Bryan should have been the guy since day 1. silly me, thought that was Dolph Ziggler It's John Cena. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 22:38:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2015 19:55:36 GMT -5
silly me, thought that was Dolph Ziggler It's John Cena. I respect that opinion and can't say that that's wrong...just prefer ziggler's work more & a few others but cena is quite consistent |
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of 45 and 47! on Feb 10, 2015 3:11:24 GMT -5
So is this going to be a yearly thing, WWE have a winner for the Rumble then the fans bitch and moan until they get their way? It only encourages them to pull that stupid crapthat Philly done at the Rumble this year.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 22:38:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2015 4:46:17 GMT -5
Rollins should have won at Rumble Bryan wins Rumble Bryan vs. Rollins main eventing Wrestlemania 30 in the greatest match in Wrestlemania history. = ALL Fans Happy.  I seriously laughed way too much at this blunder. |
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Feb 10, 2015 13:58:00 GMT -5
I think it's hilarious how some people ragged on fans for #CancelWWENetwork because Roman Reigns won the Royal Rumble
Only to turn around and say "I won't watch WrestleMania if Daniel Bryan is in the main event".
|
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Feb 10, 2015 14:55:57 GMT -5
Rollins should have won at Rumble Bryan wins Rumble Bryan vs. Rollins main eventing Wrestlemania 30 in the greatest match in Wrestlemania history. = ALL Fans Happy. I seriously laughed way too much at this blunder. oh wow....thats i meant.... i....  |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 22:38:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2015 23:28:17 GMT -5
I like Roman but he doesn't have "it" - yet. If he had "it," he could string two sentences together without sounding like an idiot (this may be a problem of WWE's scripting, I admit). Rusev has not been pinned or made to submit in over a year, but that doesn't mean the WWE has told a story justifying him entering the main event of the biggest event of the year. Like I said, I don't think people dislike Roman specifically (I know I don't), they just don't like that fact that WWE doesn't give us a reason to believe he's "the guy." They can tell us he is, but they haven't shown us. That's storytelling 101. It's the exact same thing with Batista. Even from the outside, it seems odd that he just got shotgunned into that spot without any build-up to it. If Roman had stayed healthy all year, I have no doubt he would have been on Team Cena and done Ziggler's role at Survivor Series, he would have feuded with the Authority and built up to the spot. But he wasn't, and he didn't. Which is the point I'm trying to make. "It" is something you either have, or don't. You don't learn it. Roman has "it". Considering his injury, they've done a fine job building him. The execution of the Rumble was piss poor, but that doesn't mean Roman isn't ready. He is. Idk what this "it" you're referring to is because it's not the good one. What makes you so delusional that you think he's so great? Name ONE good match he's had or ONE great thing he's done when he wasn't in the shield with two incredible performers guiding him, that makes you think he deserves the main event spot at mania? Terrible feud with Orton, who couldn't even make him look good and uhhh yeah, that's all he's done. He brings to the table mediocre mic skills and mediocre wrestling. It's not an opinion that both those skills are mediocre, it's the truth. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 22:38:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2015 23:41:36 GMT -5
"It" is something you either have, or don't. You don't learn it. Roman has "it". Considering his injury, they've done a fine job building him. The execution of the Rumble was piss poor, but that doesn't mean Roman isn't ready. He is. Idk what this "it" you're referring to is because it's not the good one. What makes you so delusional that you think he's so great? Name ONE good match he's had or ONE great thing he's done when he wasn't in the shield with two incredible performers guiding him, that makes you think he deserves the main event spot at mania? Terrible feud with Orton, who couldn't even make him look good and uhhh yeah, that's all he's done. He brings to the table mediocre mic skills and mediocre wrestling. It's not an opinion that both those skills are mediocre, it's the truth. Roman has "it" for sure, he just hasn't developed completely. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 22:38:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2015 23:43:41 GMT -5
Idk what this "it" you're referring to is because it's not the good one. What makes you so delusional that you think he's so great? Name ONE good match he's had or ONE great thing he's done when he wasn't in the shield with two incredible performers guiding him, that makes you think he deserves the main event spot at mania? Terrible feud with Orton, who couldn't even make him look good and uhhh yeah, that's all he's done. He brings to the table mediocre mic skills and mediocre wrestling. It's not an opinion that both those skills are mediocre, it's the truth. Roman has "it" for sure, he just hasn't developed completely. I agree he can be a good main eventer but saying he has "it" right now and trying to justify with all your mite that he should be in the main even of mania for the WWE title already is absurd, especially when you have yet to prove why you should be in that spot |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 22:38:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2015 23:44:58 GMT -5
Roman has "it" for sure, he just hasn't developed completely. I agree he can be a good main eventer but saying he has "it" right now and trying to justify with all your mite that he should be in the main even of mania for the WWE title already is absurd, especially when you have yet to prove why you should be in that spot You can definitely say he has "it" right now. "It" isn't developed. You just have it or you don't. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 22:38:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2015 23:50:52 GMT -5
I agree he can be a good main eventer but saying he has "it" right now and trying to justify with all your mite that he should be in the main even of mania for the WWE title already is absurd, especially when you have yet to prove why you should be in that spot You can definitely say he has "it" right now. "It" isn't developed. You just have it or you don't. I think you can develop "it" look at Cena. I doubt when he first showed up in his jobber gear that people were like "this guy has IT, he's gonna be huge" even when he was rapping in his jean shorts and baggy jerseys, I don't think people thought he had IT, but eventually he really shined and people saw that he did have it and became huge |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 22:38:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2015 23:53:45 GMT -5
You can definitely say he has "it" right now. "It" isn't developed. You just have it or you don't. I think you can develop "it" look at Cena. I doubt when he first showed up in his jobber gear that people were like "this guy has IT, he's gonna be huge" even when he was rapping in his jean shorts and baggy jerseys, I don't think people thought he had IT, but eventually he really shined and people saw that he did have it and became huge John Cena always had "it." |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 22:38:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2015 8:19:10 GMT -5
Cesaro should have won the Rumble dammit.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Feb 15, 2015 9:09:21 GMT -5
I really think it should be a Fatal-4-Way. Lesnar, Bryan, Reigns, and Rollins. I agree although Orton/Rollins seems very likely and if Rollins is in the main event then who does Orton face? Sheamus? Ziggler? I would say Wyatt but he is suppose to face Taker. If that doesn't happen because Taker is too 'rough looking' then Orton/Wyatt seems like a great option since it would be a great match and it lets Rollins get a deserving WM Main Event! |
|
Supreme Cross
Superstar
Joined on: Jun 5, 2014 19:01:32 GMT -5
Posts: 571 
|
Post by Supreme Cross on Feb 15, 2015 20:48:04 GMT -5
i cant see them replacing Reigns with Daniel Bryan. yes, i know the fans want Daniel Bryan instead of Reigns but i just cant see him going over to Reigns at Fastlane. Reigns earned his spot in the first place
|
|
|
|
Post by Evil Abed on Feb 16, 2015 0:16:02 GMT -5
I'd like to see a Wrestlemania 10 type scenario play out.
Bryan vs. Rollins to start off the show - Rollins wins via a heelish finish
Lesnar defeats Reigns for the title midway through the show when Rollins tries to cash in (unsuccessfully) after a spear to Lesnar from Reigns but distracts Roman long enough for Lesnar to pin Reigns following an F-5. Reigns chases off Rollins.
Bryan defeats Lesnar in the main event after a hard fought match to win the WWE Title.
Rollins returns and cashes in to defeat Bryan for the title.
- This way Roman's push can be held off until he is actually ready to be the main guy on the show, Lesnar proves he is still a beast and is only beatable by being forced to wrestle two matches in the same night, Bryan returns to the WWE Title scene and Rollins gets a huge rub as the next guy by being the only guy to cash in MITB at Wrestlemania and leaving as WWE Champion.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 22:38:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2015 0:22:46 GMT -5
I'd like to see a Wrestlemania 10 type scenario play out. Bryan vs. Rollins to start off the show - Rollins wins via a heelish finish Lesnar defeats Reigns for the title midway through the show when Rollins tries to cash in (unsuccessfully) after a spear to Lesnar from Reigns but distracts Roman long enough for Lesnar to pin Reigns following an F-5. Reigns chases off Rollins. Bryan defeats Lesnar in the main event after a hard fought match to win the WWE Title. Rollins returns and cashes in to defeat Bryan for the title. - This way Roman's push can be held off until he is actually ready to be the main guy on the show, Lesnar proves he is still a beast and is only beatable by being forced to wrestle two matches in the same night, Bryan returns to the WWE Title scene and Rollins gets a huge rub as the next guy by being the only guy to cash in MITB at Wrestlemania and leaving as WWE Champion. No, just no. Why would Bryan lose and then face Lesnar? Why would Lesnar and Reigns be in the middle of the show? Just no. |
|
