The Genuine Worst Wrestler You Have Ever Seen?

Let's not be ridiculous here just for the sake of it...

I also found Ric Flair overrated in the ring but to say he's the worst you've ever seen is just nonsense and looking to start something.

No way in hell was Flair worse in the ring than Giant Gonzalez, Great Khali, Sandman, etc. and to even think that he was is just ridiculous.

Flair had some great matches with many talented guys. We're Flair's matches predictable? Yes. Repetitive? Yes.

But don't call him the worst worker you've ever seen when I know you people have watched Wrestlemania 9.

I would have to say Kenzo Suzuki was one of the worst (maybe THE worst for me) he just bad all around and his finisher was never good for him. No impact at all.

I am surprised a couple people here said Heidenreich. Though he is my guilty pleasure (no, I don't mean HeidenRape). Loved his finisher and his "pow-pow, pow-pow" punches were amusing.

An honorable mention would have to be Miz. He is not the worse but Dear F'n GOD, he is BORING. Every move is done in the most boring manner with little to no emotion. The only time I liked him was when he took that Legit Trouble in Paradise to the face.

This. 100%.

How has Jeff Hardy not been mentioned? I mean seriously can you name me any memorable Hardy moment that didnt involve him throwing himself off of a ladder or through a table? He fought like a kid plays a wrestling game...kick, punch, kick, punch, top rope & misses a move, kick, punch, high spot off the ladder and pin.

Steve McMichael

Khali.

I'm also adding Mick Foley to this. He is one of the absolute worse ever. You say Khali and the like can't work. Well, Foley is the same. Horrendous.

So you two would rather watch New Jack, the Sandman, Ian Rotten, or The Great Antonio wrestle, right?

Come on, Jeff's no in ring technician and I'm sure as hell biased, but to say he's the worst is downright ludicrous and wrong. And Palmer already explained Foley and Jeff well too so I'll leave it at that.

Lets be realistic here..If we're truly going to find the "worst wrestler ever" then we all know its some 40lbs over weight guy that wrestles at a Flea Market, that was watching wrestling one night and said "After this beer Imma be a rassler"....We know that but when you remove nobodies like him and yes remove guys like Big Show, Khali, Andre etc who were hampered by their sizes and look at guys who actually made their names in big time wrestling, Jeff Hardy can easily be put at the top of that list. Does New Jack suck? Sure...does Ian Rotten suck? Of course but if they walk down a street nobody is going to recognize them. They're nobodies. Throw those guys out with your redneck rassler at the Flea Market. Mick Foley gets thrown under the bus but Ive seen Foley have feuds with Vader, Sting and The Undertaker that didn't involve spot fests. Were there matches that did involve it? Sure, but not every match was some bloody brawl and those matches were still memorable. What all did Jeff Hardy do that was amazing? There was TLC 1 and TLC 2 and a ladder match with Undertaker, and yes...all great matches...but they were all spot fests that needed props. When did Hardy ever go in and wrestle someone for 30-45 mins? When did he ever go into a ring and show that he had any sort of ring psychology? And I'm sure someone will bring up his feud with Punk and to be honest, I didn't watch it but it goes with something that's been stated here in this thread already, how good are you if the person you're wrestling is carrying you.....


Which leads me to the next topic. Anyone that says Ric Flair is a bad wrestler is just making a complete asinine statement. I'm not going to tell people they have to love or hate Flair or that you have to say he's the very best ever... but to say he isn't good at what he does just shows you have no idea what you're talking about. It's one thing for a fan to say "Flair is great" but its an opinion that can be easily swayed by being biased. When nearly every one of Flairs peers say that Flair is the greatest, peers that know a hell of a lot more then we as fans do, then that should say something. Saying "Well Flair only had good matches when he had someone to carry him like Steamboat" is dumb because Flair vs Road Warrior Hawk tore houses down on the GAB tour and lets be honest, Road Warrior Hawk doesn't have ring ability of a Kurt Angle. There are many instances where Flair has gotten into the ring with subpar competition and has put on great matches and tore a soldout house down. The only people I ever see bash Flair & his ring work are Shane Douglas, who's bitter because he always thinks someone is screwing him and Bret Hart who's too busy with his own head up his ass believing he's the greatest wrestler to ever walk the planet. Which leads me to another point. The fans of wrestlers that say "so and so isn't good cause he did the same stuff every match" clearly do not pay attention to wrestling. Perfect example, if you take a middle rope elbow, Russian leg sweep, back-breaker and a sharpshooter away from Bret Hart, what kinda match do you have? Bret Hart did the same select moves in every match just as Flair did, just as Hogan did, just as Savage, Cena, Triple H, HBK & every other great wrestler did. What makes those guys great is the fact they can take a handful of moves and make a story out of them and put asses in those 18" seats.