|
|
Post by bigshab421 on Mar 3, 2015 8:04:17 GMT -5
Thinks that Seth Rollins cashes in his MITB contract at WrestleMania..........and loses?
Honestly though, the way they have booked everything as of late really makes me feel like this is going to happen. I can just see it now, a chorus of 75,000 boos come down on Reigns after he wins, then the crowd explodes for Rollins' cash in. Then about 2 mins later after getting curb stomped, Reigns defies the odds once again, takes out J&J with one spear, and reverses another curb stomp into a superman punch.
Reigns defeats the two biggest villains in WWE in a fell swoop of about 5 minutes just to really give the crowd a big F-U
|
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Mar 3, 2015 8:05:53 GMT -5
Hopefully.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Charisma on Mar 3, 2015 8:34:29 GMT -5
I am rooting for him to cash and win it really. WM has the possibility of ending with boos if Reigns wins and I doubt WWE would want that.
The crowd should go crazy if Rollins wins, experiencing a cash in is an awesome experience I'd imagine.
|
|
|
|
Post by bigshab421 on Mar 3, 2015 8:43:34 GMT -5
I am rooting for him to cash and win it really. WM has the possibility of ending with boos if Reigns wins and I doubt WWE would want that. The crowd should go crazy if Rollins wins, experiencing a cash in is an awesome experience I'd imagine. If they didn't want that, they could have did the right thing and not put Reigns in the Main Event. Honest to god, at this point I wish we would have gotten a clean rubber match with Cena/Lesnar for the WWE Title and Rusev/Reigns for the US Title, much better than what we are getting. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 14, 2024 1:59:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2015 8:45:43 GMT -5
I think that Rollins WILL cash in at the end of Wrestlemania.
But I think it will be on Brock, not Reigns. I think Brock is going to beat Reigns in a 'tough' match, leaving the crowd mixed but ultimately, saving Reigns and the inevitable backlash he'd receive for winning the big one too soon.
For the pop and send-off-home, Rollins could come out and BELIEVABLY pick the pieces from a battered Brock and then there is Brock's exit if need be, and the new champion going forward, without doing too much damage to Reigns.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Charisma on Mar 3, 2015 9:00:52 GMT -5
If they didn't want that, they could have did the right thing and not put Reigns in the Main Event. WWE loves a good troll once in awhile, piss fans off and then surprise! Rollins wins |
|
|
|
Post by bababooey on Mar 3, 2015 9:06:59 GMT -5
I think Rollins will lose to Orton earlier in the night. Then Reigns will beat Lesnar. Only to have Rollins cash in and win.
I think that makes a perfect transition to move Lesnar out of the story.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 14, 2024 1:59:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2015 9:43:33 GMT -5
If they really want to cement Reigns as a star, they'll do it.
Bryan was completely legitimised at WM30, going over 3 of the biggest stars of all time in one night. WM31 is the night of Reigns.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Mar 3, 2015 10:28:23 GMT -5
I really don't wanna have to deal with Rollins as the WWE Champion, so hopefully.
|
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Mar 3, 2015 10:29:46 GMT -5
I think that Rollins WILL cash in at the end of Wrestlemania. But I think it will be on Brock, not Reigns. I think Brock is going to beat Reigns in a 'tough' match, leaving the crowd mixed but ultimately, saving Reigns and the inevitable backlash he'd receive for winning the big one too soon. For the pop and send-off-home, Rollins could come out and BELIEVABLY pick the pieces from a battered Brock and then there is Brock's exit if need be, and the new champion going forward, without doing too much damage to Reigns. Part of me is telling me this is the scenario the WWE is going forth with. We shall wait and see. From last night night's RAW, the WWE is clearly telegraphing what could happen at WrestleMania XXXI. |
|
|
|
Post by Planktung on Mar 3, 2015 10:30:22 GMT -5
 that. It's Seth's time. |
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Mar 3, 2015 10:49:21 GMT -5
They've laughed in the face of every audience that has completely rejected their idea of the next big star, so why not do it one more time?
|
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Mar 3, 2015 10:50:37 GMT -5
It only works if he tries to cash in and someone interferes and makes him lose. I wouldn't be against it, it'd give Rollins plenty to b*tch about for the foreseeable future.
But when he cashes in, he'll win.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 14, 2024 1:59:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2015 11:06:23 GMT -5
I don't know about him losing or not but...
A cash-in at Wrestlemania needs to happen as its never been done before.
|
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Mar 3, 2015 11:11:38 GMT -5
I don't know about him losing or not but... A cash-in at Wrestlemania needs to happen as its never been done before. To add, a Money In The Bank cash-in would be a big deal since this is the tenth anniversary of the first MITB ladder match. |
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Mar 3, 2015 11:21:14 GMT -5
I am rooting for him to cash and win it really. WM has the possibility of ending with boos if Reigns wins and I doubt WWE would want that. The crowd should go crazy if Rollins wins, experiencing a cash in is an awesome experience I'd imagine. If they didn't want that, they could have did the right thing and not put Reigns in the Main Event. Honest to god, at this point I wish we would have gotten a clean rubber match with Cena/Lesnar for the WWE Title and Rusev/Reigns for the US Title, much better than what we are getting.Yes!!! That's what I said from the get-go! Reigns winning the US Title and having a lengthy reign with the US Title would do more to help him come the time when the WWE puts the WWE Title on him, more so than getting Cena vs. Rusev and Reigns vs. Lesnar. |
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Mar 3, 2015 11:31:33 GMT -5
If they really want to cement Reigns as a star, they'll do it. Bryan was completely legitimised at WM30, going over 3 of the biggest stars of all time in one night. WM31 is the night of Reigns. Legitimized right back to the midcard unfortunately. Don't get wrong, I agree that he should have been a made man with what happened at WrestleMania XXX, but a year later and he's not in a very good spot. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 14, 2024 1:59:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2015 11:35:03 GMT -5
If they really want to cement Reigns as a star, they'll do it. Bryan was completely legitimised at WM30, going over 3 of the biggest stars of all time in one night. WM31 is the night of Reigns. Legitimized right back to the midcard unfortunately. Don't get wrong, I agree that he should have been a made man with what happened at WrestleMania XXX, but a year later and he's not in a very good spot. Granted I haven't seen the previous Raw, but I thought he was in line for a match with Ziggler or Sheamus? Either way, Cena is facing a mid carder for a tertiary title, and he's still the man. This entire Mania screams of WM11 booking where most of the top guys were booked against midcarders. Bryan's been legitimized now to he point where he won't ever not be a star. Just look at Bret in the 90s, he had feuds with a dentist and a pirate but he was still the #1 guy. |
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Mar 3, 2015 11:38:50 GMT -5
Legitimized right back to the midcard unfortunately. Don't get wrong, I agree that he should have been a made man with what happened at WrestleMania XXX, but a year later and he's not in a very good spot. Granted I haven't seen the previous Raw, but I thought he was in line for a match with Ziggler or Sheamus? Either way, Cena is facing a mid carder for a tertiary title, and he's still the man. This entire Mania screams of WM11 booking where most of the top guys were booked against midcarders. Bryan's been legitimized now to he point where he won't ever not be a star. Just look at Bret in the 90s, he had feuds with a dentist and a pirate but he was still the #1 guy. And with the exception of WrestleMania XI with Backlund, Bret was never in a bad spot at Mania. It seems like Bryan is going to be shoehorned into the IC Title stuff. While a guy like him, booked right, could bring prestige back to the title, I don't have faith in the booking. He'd win and it would be a prop so Michael Cole can spot off "Bryan has held the IC Title for x amount of days!" Plus, the booking for this multi man ladder match has kind of sucked. |
|
noir
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 20, 2007 6:53:47 GMT -5
Posts: 4,278
|
Post by noir on Mar 3, 2015 11:43:02 GMT -5
Cringing because I can picture that happening right now. The booking for reigns hasn't ceased to shock me... Okay but still not as cringe as this post. |
|
