|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Mar 18, 2015 12:32:36 GMT -5
I honestly think that Roman Reigns losing a hard fought match does MORE for him than winning the Title. If Reigns and Brock can have a good match, Reigns will actually earn some respect from people who doubt him. IF Reigns wins, no matter if the match is good or not, people will crap all over him and be negative about things just because they general feeling is that he's not ready. So you actually help Reigns more if he has a good match and loses. That way, people who think he sucks in the ring will maybe respect him a little more. A year from now, if Reigns becomes better in the ring and learns to act a little better, he may actually be ready for the Title. I still think the best outcome for everyone is to have Rollins run in towards the end of the match, cash in, and steal Reigns' spotlight. It all depends on Brock, honestly. If Brock is leaving, then Vince is probably thinking "screw him" and Reigns will win clean. Then whatever happens with Rollins can happen after the match, or the next night on RAW. If Brock is staying, Brock will probably win. Now, I heard an interesting rumor about The Undertaker potentially attacking Brock the next night on RAW that leads to a Seth Rollins cash in....but I would only be in favor of that if Brock is leaving, because if Undertaker costs Brock the belt and Brock is staying, I don't want to see Brock and Taker have another match, and if Brock is staying, it would make no sense for him to not eventually try and get revenge on Taker for costing him the belt. There are a lot of variables, a lot of potential scenarios....and I think the biggest factor is Brock Lesnar and his contract situation. They've got less than 2 weeks to figure this out. Either way, if Brock stays or goes, he's still not full time, so I think the obvious feud post-Mania is Reigns/Rollins no matter what. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2015 12:34:09 GMT -5
I hope it's just like last year with Brock vs Taker. Everyone was like "ugh taker is just gonna win again, doesn't matter if it's Lesnar" but then bam, outta nowhere we get an F-5 and no kick out.
Everyone thinks Reigns is gonna win but then Lesnar is gonna hit an f-5 and people are gonna think Reigns is gonna inch by and get a kick out and get a comeback but nope. Lesnar gets the 1.2.3
|
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Mar 18, 2015 12:41:15 GMT -5
I'm taking all of this with a grain of salt, but, meh.
I'm all for Brock retaining, but I don't see it happening. To me, the money is in Rollins leaving Mania with the title and having Reigns chase him for the next several months off and on, only to maybe win the thing for real at Summerslam. He's not ready for a long term run right now, so maybe stealing it out from underneath him will give him some shadow of a Bryan effect.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2015 12:46:38 GMT -5
Nice assumption skills there from the Reddit guy.
He neglected to mention the cancelled Dust-Brothers match as well as the cancelled Ziggler/Bryan match. And he hasn't mentioned anything about the cancellation of The Rock's appearance at Mania, either. Or the cancellation of the Undertaker/Brock rematch. Or the cancellation of the Reigns/Rollins Title Match. Or the Sting/Undertaker match planned as far back as SummerSlam, or the prediction for Bryan/Ziggler to win the Rumble, or that time CM Punk was due to show up in Chicago (2 separate times)...
...infact, the dude has neglected to mention the cancellation of anything else he has publicly assumed would happen in the last few months, for that matter!
But 2 weeks before the show, when the post-Mania forecast becomes clearer for all viewers, hes suddenly been told all the answers I see? LEGIT!
Its only after the show, you'll realise that his 'predictions' will either be incredibly wrong, or quite easily and obviously correct. That's when you realise hes a guesser, just like the rest of us.
|
|
|
|
Post by Optimus Prime on Mar 18, 2015 13:12:07 GMT -5
Because the sight of R-Truth sneaking up and snatching the Intercontinental belt like a cartoon character is the vision of prestige.
|
|
MikeMillenium
Main Eventer
I LOVE THE WWE AND EVERYTHING ABOUT IT
Joined on: Jul 21, 2010 13:45:54 GMT -5
Posts: 1,622
|
Post by MikeMillenium on Mar 18, 2015 13:20:18 GMT -5
Could these be classified as spoilers? or potential spoilers?
|
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Mar 18, 2015 13:23:54 GMT -5
Could these be classified as spoilers? or potential spoilers? Nope, just some random after his 5 minutes of fame. |
|
|
|
Post by A-Rob on Mar 18, 2015 13:30:46 GMT -5
it appears reddit is wrestling's TMZ...
|
|
|
|
Post by JC Motors on Mar 18, 2015 13:49:33 GMT -5
it appears reddit is wrestling's TMZ... Reddit seems to be a dirtsheet nowadays |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2015 13:58:26 GMT -5
Wrestlemania. Brock wins
Rollins cashes in. Brock wins.
Extreme Rules triple threat with Reigns and Rollins. Brock wins.
Summerslam vs Sheamus. Brock wins.
Royal Rumble vs Orton. Brock wins.
Wrestlemania 32 vs Bryan.......
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2015 14:02:08 GMT -5
Brock winning I wouldn't mind, but it would mean no champion in between Mania and SummerSlam. And I don't really want that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Midnight on Mar 18, 2015 14:11:13 GMT -5
I honestly think that Roman Reigns losing a hard fought match does MORE for him than winning the Title. If Reigns and Brock can have a good match, Reigns will actually earn some respect from people who doubt him. IF Reigns wins, no matter if the match is good or not, people will crap all over him and be negative about things just because they general feeling is that he's not ready. So you actually help Reigns more if he has a good match and loses. That way, people who think he sucks in the ring will maybe respect him a little more. A year from now, if Reigns becomes better in the ring and learns to act a little better, he may actually be ready for the Title. I agree with this so much. |
|
E N I G M A
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 4, 2010 5:21:31 GMT -5
Posts: 2,649
|
Post by E N I G M A on Mar 18, 2015 15:10:51 GMT -5
I honestly think that Roman Reigns losing a hard fought match does MORE for him than winning the Title. If Reigns and Brock can have a good match, Reigns will actually earn some respect from people who doubt him. IF Reigns wins, no matter if the match is good or not, people will crap all over him and be negative about things just because they general feeling is that he's not ready. So you actually help Reigns more if he has a good match and loses. That way, people who think he sucks in the ring will maybe respect him a little more. A year from now, if Reigns becomes better in the ring and learns to act a little better, he may actually be ready for the Title. I agree with this so much. Dito! |
|
Mr Wrestling Jr.
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 6, 2010 7:07:35 GMT -5
Posts: 3,410
|
Post by Mr Wrestling Jr. on Mar 18, 2015 23:21:47 GMT -5
Seeing as the majority of Cena's Title reigns the past few years last for a month and a half, there is no way he should be a Champion. Plus, is Rusev not able to elevate the title by defending in it main events? Against Cena, Orton, Ryback others? When Rusev does lose it should be to someone like Ryback who NEEDS a big win. Fans have got behind him again and WWE has pretty much  ed that up. |
|
|
|
Post by Flair Forever on Mar 20, 2015 0:23:11 GMT -5
Does this mean we'll see the return of the US "Spinner" belt? Word up....  BTW, no way Brock walks out of 'Mania with the title.... they've been building up Reigns all this time for nothing? |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2015 0:30:15 GMT -5
To those saying Lesnar and Rusev should win, youre just plain wrong. Rusev and Lesnars whole runs have been about them being monsters, how nobody could touch them. The whole point of those story lines is to have someone take them down at wrestlemania. If reigns doesnt beat lesnar, then hom beating taker at mania was a huge mistake. Reigns wins, and hes a solidified main eventer for life, while lesnar does whatever the he does, hes unreliable. I agree that rusev will have nothing to do after he gets beaten, but to say Cena should lose to him at Wrestlemania? No. Thats what the whole run has been for, to have the beast slain at wrestlemania, same with brock. |
|
Butchers
Superstar
Joined on: Jun 26, 2002 5:00:08 GMT -5
Posts: 774
|
Post by Butchers on Mar 20, 2015 5:46:45 GMT -5
So we're expected to believe this guy knows what's happening despite the fact I'm sure only Vince, Brock, Triple H, Heyman and maybe a few others would know about this?
Maybe Kalisto will debut his gay gimmick the night after on Raw.
|
|
|
|
Post by cordless2016 on Mar 20, 2015 6:36:17 GMT -5
Brock won't retain. I agree with this. A Rusev loss in this match ends him. Because when Angle lost to Tazz that was the end of him too. I wouldn't put Rusev anywhere near Kurt angles level. 2 different situations. |
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Mar 20, 2015 7:06:57 GMT -5
I'm not for Reigns being in the position he is, but Brock should lose at WM. Staying or not, He shouldn't leave WM with title.
I'd prefer Seth to leave with title, but if its Reigns then fine.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2015 7:09:26 GMT -5
You guys questioning the "user" really need to do your research on metsfan4ever. He's been wrong, no doubt, but most of the time he's been wrong, there's been a viable explanation from him.
|
|
