Deleted
Joined on: Nov 24, 2024 2:49:36 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 12:22:32 GMT -5
Ah yeah I see that man.....I think 99 would have been better for him.....many squandered opportunities with Kane. 2001 if not for the Invasion would've been perfect as well. To this day I still scratch my head at Kanes use in 2001(alongside Austin's) After defeat in the very well booked LMS match @ Armageddon 2000 (which didn't make him look weak at all) Kane is rebuilt incredibly well. enters a COMMANDING performance in RR2001 and becomes OVER AS HELL in the process. then? Nothing. BOD again.....YAWN. The Two man Power Trip should've been UT & HHH.....Opposed by Austin & Kane. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 24, 2024 2:49:36 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2015 12:28:32 GMT -5
Kane had a good 2001 which could've been even better.
I thought 2003 should've been his year though. He was on a roll and held like every belt but couldn't defeat Triple H due to Katie Vick's ghost.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Apr 18, 2015 13:19:12 GMT -5
2001 if not for the Invasion would've been perfect as well. To this day I still scratch my head at Kanes use in 2001(alongside Austin's) After defeat in the very well booked LMS match @ Armageddon 2000 (which didn't make him look weak at all) Kane is rebuilt incredibly well. enters a COMMANDING performance in RR2001 and becomes OVER AS HELL in the process. then? Nothing. BOD again.....YAWN. The Two man Power Trip should've been UT & HHH.....Opposed by Austin & Kane. Definently, and like @bashcrashwiley said, Kane should've beaten Triple H in 02 or 03. |
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Apr 18, 2015 19:11:38 GMT -5
To this day I still scratch my head at Kanes use in 2001(alongside Austin's) After defeat in the very well booked LMS match @ Armageddon 2000 (which didn't make him look weak at all) Kane is rebuilt incredibly well. enters a COMMANDING performance in RR2001 and becomes OVER AS HELL in the process. then? Nothing. BOD again.....YAWN. The Two man Power Trip should've been UT & HHH.....Opposed by Austin & Kane. Definently, and like @bashcrashwiley said, Kane should've beaten Triple H in 02 or 03. Kane was over as hell in 2002/2003 so it really baffles me that he didn't get a title reign. Vince McMahon should look at Kane and be ashamed at the way he has treated him over the years. |
|
|
|
Post by cordless2016 on Apr 18, 2015 19:20:26 GMT -5
I totally get all that, I just wish Kane would have gotten a good title run, especially around this time period. Ah yeah I see that man.....I think 99 would have been better for him.....many squandered opportunities with Kane. 2002 when he returned in the fall was the best chance for him IMO. Kane returned and he was red hot. Instead of booking him as a strong face to the evil HHH they booked him as a joke with the Kanerooni and Katie Vick crap. Sadly he was just another victim of the HHH reign of terror. |
|
|
|
Post by mikey1974 on Apr 19, 2015 16:11:34 GMT -5
Kane had a good 2001 which could've been even better. I thought 2003 should've been his year though. He was on a roll and held like every belt but couldn't defeat Triple H due to Katie Vick's ghost. LOL! ironically I just created a thread about this! |
|
