|
Post by Goldust on Jun 28, 2015 9:06:13 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 16:01:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2015 9:21:18 GMT -5
I'm surprised there's no memes of his head in a jar yet.
|
|
|
Post by MADNESS_NH_97 on Jun 28, 2015 15:28:00 GMT -5
Well of the millennium so far, he would be considered number one. They called it "The top 25 Superstars of the new millennium" Without "so far" And in the first part of the Article they just called it "Here are 25 of the best Superstars of this very young millennium." beside the Title of it so... "this very young" does not mean "so far" And why even call it millennium instead of Century which would be 900 Years less and a bit more logical
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Jun 28, 2015 15:28:58 GMT -5
Well of the millennium so far, he would be considered number one. They called it "The top 25 Superstars of the new millennium" Without "so far" And in the first part of the Article they just called it "Here are 25 of the best Superstars of this very young millennium." beside the Title of it so... "this very young" does not mean "so far" And why even call it millennium instead of Century which would be 900 Years less and a bit more logical Agreed, it should have been century, but either way, Cena does top it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 16:01:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2015 16:35:10 GMT -5
Century wouldn't make sense either unless they were counting 1915-2015.
Cena wouldn't top that list either.
It should've been "superstar of the last few years or so"
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Jun 28, 2015 16:43:41 GMT -5
Century wouldn't make sense either unless they were counting 1915-2015. Cena wouldn't top that list either. It should've been "superstar of the last few years or so" I believe they meant century/millennium starting from 2000 and on.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 16:01:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2015 16:48:25 GMT -5
Century wouldn't make sense either unless they were counting 1915-2015. Cena wouldn't top that list either. It should've been "superstar of the last few years or so" I believe they meant century/millennium starting from 2000 and on. Yeah they did. I got choo. They dumb AF.
|
|
|
Post by kazoosandstreamers on Jun 29, 2015 13:20:36 GMT -5
I don't get it. ha Choose a superstar of the decade at most.
|
|
|
Post by A-Rob on Jun 29, 2015 16:56:35 GMT -5
WWE.com list...what marks.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 16:01:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2015 17:51:54 GMT -5
The Rock is clearly the most famous person of the 2000s to come from the world of wrestling, and I'd dare say 2000 was indeed his biggest year. But, just like Jesse Ventura, he made the jump to another field and became a household name. Cena has been an extreme-level main event Superman character for the last decade, so he is the most deserving of this.
|
|
|
Post by Himmy! on Jul 1, 2015 3:33:30 GMT -5
Well so far yeah.
|
|
|
Post by specterkev on Jul 2, 2015 2:59:37 GMT -5
Homer: Must have been a pretty slow century.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 16:01:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2015 4:12:20 GMT -5
Homer: Must have been a pretty slow century. "Superstar of the millenium"
|
|