Kasper
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 16, 2007 15:35:47 GMT -5
Posts: 2,185
|
Post by Kasper on Aug 17, 2015 22:17:50 GMT -5
im kinda into this new storyline in which Undertaker is just old and crazy.....and returns just to do run-ins and kick ppl in the groin Arrive Kick groin Leave |
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Aug 17, 2015 22:18:10 GMT -5
On another note, John Cena needs to watching Pauls segment. Notice how Paul put Taker over? Thats how you sell a match. Dont  ing call your opponent a joke and verbally bury him 6 feet under. |
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Aug 17, 2015 22:18:22 GMT -5
I get that it's a circle, that doesn't make it interesting. Yes, Taker gets his revenge. Hooray. Bully for him. In this feud, Taker comes off as a guy who is salty because "I CAN'T BEAT BORK. MAYBE IF I KICK HIM IN THE BALLS AND COST HIM THE BELT, I CAN AT LEAST BE 1-6 AGAINST HIM. THEN CAN I RETIRE HAPPILY". It's just been meh. Oh look, more meh from this program. Can I just have Brock/Seth, Brock/Reigns again, Brock/Ambrose or something else instead? no because the WWE books Brock to absolutely demolish everyone, so those matches would do nothing but DESTROY the momentum any of those guys had. We almost had it with Rollins last month. |
|
|
|
Post by Calcifer Boheme on Aug 17, 2015 22:18:32 GMT -5
History should be remembered, but not to shat on someone. They're putting over their current talent. Nothing wrong with that imo. I do wish it was someone better that they were using to break the record. But I do agree with the thought behind this. |
|
|
|
Post by cmiller79 on Aug 17, 2015 22:18:20 GMT -5
im kinda into this new storyline in which Undertaker is just old and crazy.....and returns just to do run-ins and kick ppl in the groin he could be like the shield.the lights go out then come back on takers in the ring then boom a kick in the dick lights off and takers gone haha |
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Aug 17, 2015 22:18:41 GMT -5
I just want to say dick again
|
|
|
|
Post by Kanenite on Aug 17, 2015 22:18:53 GMT -5
It wasn't enough to show us how Taker interrupted Lesnar, kicked him in the crotch, and Chokeslamed and Tombstoned him every single week. They REALLY had to make it hit home by literately repeating the EXACT same sequence again on RAW this time.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Gangsta on Aug 17, 2015 22:19:26 GMT -5
Anyone think Sting could come in the match (as a face) and challenge the Undertaker (as a heel?) to a match at Wrestlemania?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 4:28:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2015 22:19:28 GMT -5
Taker went to Sting and said "Boy, who did your hair? Give me their number."
|
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Aug 17, 2015 22:19:46 GMT -5
The WWE really needs to understand what they have in Brock. This dude has the fans, granted they are in his hometown, booing the Undertaker. THE UNDERTAKER. Fathom that. People like to point to the pops that Cesaro or Owens get as reasons to push them. Understand that Brock is something special. Don't feed him to Taker. Please. It's not like Lesnar is not going to recover from this lost. If he can recover from a lost to Cena in his return match, and a lost to Triple H at WM29, then he can recover from a lost to Undertaker. Brock can recover from it. He's that good. He shouldn't have to though. They should book it logically, where he doesn't lost to Cena, HHH or Undertaker. That's just dumb. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 4:28:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2015 22:19:59 GMT -5
Taker Be Like  |
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Aug 17, 2015 22:20:38 GMT -5
This entire feud has been booked bizarrely. They had to know Lesnar was going to be super over tonight in Minnesota. From what I can gather, neither guy is supposed to be a heel in this feud - we're seeing a supposedly desperate Undertaker versus a guy who just likes to fight and beat people up because he can.
I really don't know who's going to win this Sunday. It seems like Lesnar is going to win based on everything that's happened so far, but if he does then what was the point of Taker coming back? They're making it seem like if he loses this match his career is over, but would he really retire on a losing note at a PPV other than Mania? Just really weird.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Aug 17, 2015 22:20:26 GMT -5
The WWE really needs to understand what they have in Brock. This dude has the fans, granted they are in his hometown, booing the Undertaker. THE UNDERTAKER. Fathom that. People like to point to the pops that Cesaro or Owens get as reasons to push them. Understand that Brock is something special. Don't feed him to Taker. Please. Yeah, I've heard some grumblings that maybe Brock wins Sunday and Taker wins in a rematch at Mania 32. To me, Lesnar should win this match and that's the end of it. The next guy that beats Brock needs to be really special in the present. It should mean something. Brock losing to Taker is WWE admitting that ending the streak was a mistake. but it was. like in the moment, yes, it was unreal. the fact it happened, one of the craziest things ever. so i get it. but in the bigger picture, it should have never happened. for all he's done in this business, Undertaker should have retired undefeated at Wrestlemania. |
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Aug 17, 2015 22:20:49 GMT -5
Dick kick city!
|
|
|
|
Post by cmiller79 on Aug 17, 2015 22:21:27 GMT -5
Brocks head was so damn far from the mat on that tombstone Indeed, but wanna talk far? Like how far up from the mat Brock goes everytime he sells a chokeslam? That's how every superstar should sell it. yeah they should always jump high as hell if they can it makes it looks much better |
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Aug 17, 2015 22:21:27 GMT -5
I hate going to bed knowing I'll need to poop in a few hours.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rule 30 on Aug 17, 2015 22:21:51 GMT -5
It's not like Lesnar is not going to recover from this lost. If he can recover from a lost to Cena in his return match, and a lost to Triple H at WM29, then he can recover from a lost to Undertaker. Brock can recover from it. He's that good. He shouldn't have to though. They should book it logically, where he doesn't lost to Cena, HHH or Undertaker. That's just dumb. I think I've made it clear before that I'm not a fan of Roman Reigns. But I would have rather seen Reigns beat Lesnar at WrestleMania than seeing Undertaking beating Lesnar at SummerSlam |
|
|
|
Post by jdfranchise on Aug 17, 2015 22:22:51 GMT -5
On another note, John Cena needs to watching Pauls segment. Notice how Paul put Taker over? Thats how you sell a match. Dont ing call your opponent a joke and verbally bury him 6 feet under. Paul understands that part of promo cutting with a live mic, Cena still needs to learn that. But when you have an infinite leash with the boss, you don't have to learn. Someone else notorious for burying guys on the mic, HHH. But I don't think he was that blatant. |
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Aug 17, 2015 22:23:15 GMT -5
I get that it's a circle, that doesn't make it interesting. Yes, Taker gets his revenge. Hooray. Bully for him. In this feud, Taker comes off as a guy who is salty because "I CAN'T BEAT BORK. MAYBE IF I KICK HIM IN THE BALLS AND COST HIM THE BELT, I CAN AT LEAST BE 1-6 AGAINST HIM. THEN CAN I RETIRE HAPPILY". It's just been meh. Oh look, more meh from this program. Can I just have Brock/Seth, Brock/Reigns again, Brock/Ambrose or something else instead? no because the WWE books Brock to absolutely demolish everyone, so those matches would do nothing but DESTROY the momentum any of those guys had. We almost had it with Rollins last month. I agree that guys like Seth and Dean should look better in those matches. I want Brock to absolutely murder Undertaker though. I'm talking, I want it to look like last year's SummerSlam. Then Undertaker can retire. |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Aug 17, 2015 22:24:10 GMT -5
God, a brawl like a few weeks ago would have made this feud super duper exciting going into Summer Slam.
|
|
