|
Post by Rontaro13 on Aug 17, 2015 23:56:06 GMT -5
People have been calling for this for months. I don't see it happening what so ever.
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Aug 17, 2015 23:57:07 GMT -5
I don't think so, and I really hope not. It seems like they're setting this up as the final match in the Reigns vs. Wyatt feud, and Harper and Ambrose were just thrown in as filler cause they have nothing else to do. But they've already ruined Ambrose so badly so many times already, nothing they do with him would surprise me at this point.
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on Aug 17, 2015 23:57:25 GMT -5
Or Reigns will turn Which I doubt, but would prefer This. Was talking to my friend during RAW and said "One is turning on the other Sunday, who's your money on?" He said Ambrose, and my response was probably, but the problem is Ambrose is in SCSA territory where he could ruin a John Cena Make A Wish segment and say something terrible about the Wish kid and still wind up getting cheered. Whereas a corporate Reigns would be completely out of the blue and would legitimately be one of the most shocking turns I've ever seen.
|
|
|
Post by A-Rob on Aug 18, 2015 0:13:27 GMT -5
Could be Reigns, gotta have a swerve during the show.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 2, 2024 20:31:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2015 0:15:26 GMT -5
eh I kind of like Roman Reigns... now that he's in the background, I wish he was back in the main event stuff...
|
|
|
Post by Ember's Flame on Aug 18, 2015 0:23:17 GMT -5
I want Reigns to turn. It could make him interesting if done right. Bash me all you want. Realistically WWE needs more babyfaces than heels nowadays, so neither should turn. If one had to I'd want to see it be Reigns.
|
|
|
Post by AmericanMadeLesGold on Aug 18, 2015 0:26:39 GMT -5
I didn't think that, but something needs to happen, this feud is getting really boring.
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Aug 18, 2015 1:32:04 GMT -5
I didn't think that, but something needs to happen, this feud is getting really boring. Absolutely. Its incredibly boring and there is nothing behind it. When Reigns/Wyatt first started to feud I was digging it. All the promos from Wyatt, going after Reigns in creepy ways, it was cool. Now its just a random 2/3 Wyatt Family Vs 2/3 Shield match, with zero reason to be feuding. Or Reigns will turn Which I doubt, but would prefer This. Was talking to my friend during RAW and said "One is turning on the other Sunday, who's your money on?" He said Ambrose, and my response was probably, but the problem is Ambrose is in SCSA territory where he could ruin a John Cena Make A Wish segment and say something terrible about the Wish kid and still wind up getting cheered. Whereas a corporate Reigns would be completely out of the blue and would legitimately be one of the most shocking turns I've ever seen. I only said what I did in the OP because thats the most obvious route we all can see happening. Their love for Reigns has been quite brutal the last year or so. (Randomly winning Superstar of the Year?) If Reigns were to turn it would be an incredible turn of events. Heel Reigns Vs Face Ambrose is money. They can eventually do their dream Cena Vs Reigns match and I would have no problem, hell I would enjoy it being Reigns is heel. I guess we'll find out come Summer Slam. If they turn Ambrose, Reigns will wind up the loser because the crowd is going to cheer Ambrose like you said.
|
|
snickelodeon
Superstar
Joined on: Nov 27, 2011 9:37:08 GMT -5
Posts: 956
|
Post by snickelodeon on Aug 18, 2015 5:53:29 GMT -5
No
Wyatts win
Builds to an eventual 6 man with Sting and Rowan when healthy. Keeps Reigns out of the title picture for a while longer.
Ambrose will more than likely turn on Reigns for a program together before Mania.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 2, 2024 20:31:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2015 6:26:03 GMT -5
Ambrose will get cheered if he attacks Reigns. But this will be WWE's way of trying to force feed you into cheering for Reigns. If both his partners are heel, You dont have a choice in the matter. F*ck what they want. I'm cheering for Dean F*cking Ambrose no matter what. Exactly, so turn Reigns heel so atleast he'll be getting booed because he's "supposed to".
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 2, 2024 20:31:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2015 6:59:14 GMT -5
I don't see the point of either one turning heel. This exactly. What would either one gain from being a member of the Wyatt Family?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 2, 2024 20:31:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2015 7:04:36 GMT -5
WWE is trying super hard to force fans to like reigns. Why would they throw it all away by having Ambrose turn on him? Ambrose is the only reason most fans give Reigns the time of day.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 2, 2024 20:31:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2015 7:10:58 GMT -5
WWE is trying super hard to force fans to like reigns. Why would they throw it all away by having Ambrose turn on him? Ambrose is the only reason most fans give Reigns the time of day. My opinion on Reigns has changed over the last few months. I won't mind now when he does win the title.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 2, 2024 20:31:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2015 7:41:36 GMT -5
WWE is trying super hard to force fans to like reigns. Why would they throw it all away by having Ambrose turn on him? Ambrose is the only reason most fans give Reigns the time of day. My opinion on Reigns has changed over the last few months. I won't mind now when he does win the title. I like him more now too.
|
|
WMDman
Main Eventer
Bad times don't last, but bad guys do.
Joined on: Jan 6, 2013 10:18:05 GMT -5
Posts: 4,469
|
Post by WMDman on Aug 18, 2015 7:49:55 GMT -5
No thanks
-WMD
|
|
jakksking1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 2, 2011 14:45:41 GMT -5
Posts: 2,843
|
Post by jakksking1 on Aug 18, 2015 9:40:30 GMT -5
I have a couple thoughts on this. They are visiting one of the smarkiest cities in he world, an Ambrose heel turn wouldn't work because he would be cheered if he beats the hell out of Reigns.
Then again, this didn't stop them the past 2 Rumbles. Maybe they have to bring in the Rock again to fend off Ambrose.
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Aug 18, 2015 9:42:49 GMT -5
Erick Rowan will return, cause Harper and Wyatt to win and beat down Ambrose and Reigns, then Sting will return at some point so at Night of Champions we can get the match that NOBODY even wanted at SummerSlam, the ridiculous and illogical team of Ambrose, Reigns and STING (WHY?) vs. The Wyatt Family.
I love Sting, but I don't want him just randomly thrown into somebody else's feud just for the sake of using him.
|
|
|
Post by "The Perfect Ten" Mizard on Aug 18, 2015 9:45:29 GMT -5
I think Reigns would be the better choice. Being a heel would suit his real life character more. Being cocky and arrogant like Batista seem natural to Reigns and it could turn him into a megastar.
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Aug 18, 2015 10:53:29 GMT -5
Either of them turning heel wouldn't come as a surprise. We've talked about them both turning heel at various points over the last year. It really doesn't make sense for either guy. Seems more intelligent to introduce a 3rd member of the Wyatts to cost Reigns and Ambrose the match. They're both good as a face right now and the only place Reings fits as a heel is under HHH and Stephanie, which only makes sense if Rollins physically hands him the US Title to make up for their history, which is still a stretch.
|
|
|
Post by Next Man’s Knowing Rock on Aug 18, 2015 18:22:51 GMT -5
I kinda like the idea of them not turning on each other.
|
|