Cody Rhodes Diva
Main Eventer
#1 Seattle Seahawks fan!
Joined on: Aug 10, 2011 3:28:01 GMT -5
Posts: 1,959
|
Post by Cody Rhodes Diva on Oct 4, 2015 19:19:38 GMT -5
IMO, I think he should. Ratings for WWE TV Shows have declined as of late and considering that Vince McMahon is afraid of creating new stars, something tells me that The Rock could very well make his return to WWE TV. After all, he is a proven draw.
|
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of 45 and 47! on Oct 4, 2015 19:28:00 GMT -5
No. He should stay a special attraction like Lesnar and Taker. Besides, he makes more money in Hollywood than WWE.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Oct 4, 2015 19:30:34 GMT -5
God no.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sizzle on Oct 4, 2015 19:31:48 GMT -5
I like him as he is right now. He doesn't need to be on my TV, unless he is in a good movie.
|
|
gawd6sic6™
Main Eventer
" I cross the lines you love to hate "
Joined on: Jan 13, 2009 13:50:08 GMT -5
Posts: 4,868
|
Post by gawd6sic6™ on Oct 4, 2015 20:05:35 GMT -5
No...
Show up here and there, spout off his catch phrases. Stand on the second rope and raise his arm. Cheap plug, cheap pop and high five a baby. ... I'm good with that.
|
|
Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD
Main Eventer
I need a monster condom for my magnum sized dong.
Joined on: Nov 25, 2011 16:25:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,713
Member is Online
|
Post by Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD on Oct 4, 2015 20:06:54 GMT -5
No, make new stars dammit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Oct 4, 2015 20:07:41 GMT -5
If he's smart, then he'll stay as far away as possible.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 5:29:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2015 20:42:46 GMT -5
No, he shouldn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by GreyHaze:Big Bad Booty Daddy on Oct 4, 2015 21:02:11 GMT -5
I wouldn't mind Rocky to return. He's a special attraction, so he would be cool for a surprise entrance in the rumble or something.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Oct 4, 2015 21:05:49 GMT -5
Absolutely! The Rock makes thing so much more interesting. Its a smart business move for WWE. For Rock....he certainly doesnt need to. So it only makes that much more of a treat.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Oct 4, 2015 21:19:01 GMT -5
No.
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Oct 4, 2015 21:24:03 GMT -5
Meh. Either way, I'll live.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 5:29:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2015 21:46:23 GMT -5
For a one time only thing absoulety but the story gotta be there for him to be involved and I think him joining reigns and Ambrose taking out the wyatt family seems like the perfect way for him to be brought up.
|
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Oct 4, 2015 21:46:34 GMT -5
The Rock has 8 movies coming out in the next 3 years. He cant return to WWE programming no matter how bad the company, the fans or The Rock himself wants to.
|
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Oct 4, 2015 21:47:05 GMT -5
Unless he is willing to commit to a regular tv and PPV schedule for a few months, then no thanks. I love The Rock, but I have no interest in him showing up, spouting his catchphrases, making whatever heel they send out look stupid, and then him disappearing.
The guy is ridiculously rich and successful in Hollywood, and honestly I don't see any reason why he would or should return to wrestling. He doesn't owe the fans anything.
|
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Oct 4, 2015 22:52:13 GMT -5
WWE is better when he's there, so yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by JHTB® on Oct 4, 2015 23:05:37 GMT -5
Yes and no. It would be great to see him when he's there, and when he leaves then what?
|
|
Miztery
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 30, 2014 0:16:59 GMT -5
Posts: 892 
|
Post by Miztery on Oct 4, 2015 23:16:04 GMT -5
If he works a schedule similar to Lesnar's.
|
|
|
|
Post by A-Rob on Oct 4, 2015 23:56:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Oct 5, 2015 4:11:53 GMT -5
I'm enjoying the product more now than I have for a long time. I don't want anyone trying to "fix" it.
The only thing that would improve what's happening now is to push Cesaro.
|
|
