hbkowns
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 15, 2011 23:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,286
|
Post by hbkowns on Nov 3, 2015 21:40:14 GMT -5
I'm prepared for the inevitable Reigns victory, but it won't happen as Survivor Series. I just have a terrible feeling that Ambrose is going to cost Reigns. Ambrose is arguably the most popular babyface at the moment. I think his merch runs second behind Cena. He's super popular with a unique character, and somebody that all the fans seem to gravitate towards.
The problem is Ambrose doesn't have a tan, tribal tats, long wet hair, and terrible fake contacts. So they'd rather take the guy who to me, has proved less (yes I said it). And has been handed every tool to be successful and he hasn't clicked as a superstar yet, nor personality. Yeah he put on a few decent to good matches but a lot of other guys can too. So what's the difference between Reigns and all those other guys? I think you guys can answer that question yourselves.
All I'm saying is Reigns will never be #1, unless there's a drastic change in character. I'm talking Ring Master to Stone Cold or Rocky Maivia to The Rock. The bright eyed baby face who cocks his fist and where's goofy looking contacts and says "BELIEVE THAT" in every other promo, will never be Cena's successor. You have a guy who the audience loves even though he's won only one pay per view singles match in the past year and a half, and always pops for him no matter where he is on the card. His name Dean Ambrose, and he's hell of a lot more qualified that Reigns.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rated [R] NinJa on Nov 3, 2015 22:05:47 GMT -5
Rollins just because I'm really enjoying his title run.
|
|
AJ F'n Brooks
Main Eventer
Thank You AJ Lee!
Joined on: Jan 1, 2013 8:57:26 GMT -5
Posts: 1,288
|
Post by AJ F'n Brooks on Nov 4, 2015 4:23:47 GMT -5
It's about to go down!!!!    What's this from? I got you covered, it's from this video: Those subtitles on the last .gif are actually wrong, Reigns says something like "Yeah, keep walking boy". |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Nov 4, 2015 6:06:45 GMT -5
Rollins for sure.
Reigns is going to win at WM so I'd like to see Rollins lose it there.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sexy Psychotic on Nov 4, 2015 6:28:07 GMT -5
I love Roman, but Rollins has to win.
Not because his reign has been great or anything like that, but to further the build, further Reigns' road to the title. Thats where the money is, his path to becoming the Champion, you dont waste that on a show that is gonna be dominated by Taker, no you save that moment for a show that can be centered around Roman all on his own....Mania.
No idea how to end it, but you have to end it with Rollins winning, maybe another cheap victory or hell maybe have him just run away or bring back Triple H as a prominent role and have him back Rollins again 100% in the build to Mania.
They did it great with Michaels, with Austin, with Batista; you dont need to throw the title on a guy, build it up, make some money and get some traction for the guy.
|
|
|
|
Post by cmiller79 on Nov 4, 2015 6:46:09 GMT -5
I'll be happy no matter who wins
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 19:34:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2015 10:30:41 GMT -5
Roman Reigns deserves it.
He managed to cap a dismally forced feud with Big Show by carrying Show to his best match in years. He managed to cap a fairly forgettable feud with Bray Wyatt with an absolute beaut of a Hell in a Cell match the other week. His promos have improved, his ring work is second to not very many.. And it's the perfect time, with the perfect opponent.
Seth has been a great champion through some shoddy booking, it wouldn't take any shine off him either if he dropped the belt to Reigns at SVS. Which is not a position Seth has been in since he first won the belt.
I agree it wasn't Romans time at WM, but the last 6 months have been very kind to Reigns, and he's carried some awful booking in his stride and has looked a star every time. He even looked a star against Brock. It's time for Roman to Reign. Theoretically, it's almost now or never.
....I still think Sheamus will cash in MITB as soon as Reigns wins it though, such is the pattern of Roman Reigns "getting so close" every time before having it snatched away. So perhaps a WM32 build up is on the cards, which worries me really g iven how last year went for him.
SVS should be his night, and I will be rooting for him 100%!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 19:34:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2015 10:50:29 GMT -5
Seth. Ill never like the main guy they want me to like. Reigns, Cena, Rock, Hogan...Stone Cold and HHH are the exception I know this is a wild extravagant theory of very little likelihood and narrow possibility... But what if you just so happen to ironically take a liking someone who they (the WWE) want you to like? You do realise that what you've just said translates to "if somebody I like gets a main event push, I'll turn on them." I respect your opinion and appreciate the honesty buddy, but fans with this attitude is the only thing that prevents success in WWE. I've never watched Game of Thrones, shocking I know, but I know it's good, because all its fans spread the word about how good it is all the time. Jon Snow is up there with Yoda, to some people!.. It makes you want to check it out, and makes me feel like I'm missing out, too! Now imagine you're a casual WWE fan, or you've never even watched wrestling before, and you decide to indulge yourself by weighing up the opinions of hardcore fans. And those fans basically tell you that the product isn't worth watching, and give some long winded explanation about how 2 suits whom you've never heard of who work behind the scenes have a secret agenda to ruin the product in spite of the very people who watch it. Trying to tell you that the big tattooed dude who they've pushed on TV whom you just saw beat the baddie with his Superman punch actually 'sucks' and 'doesn't deserve' his job... Does that sound like a welcoming product that you're missing out on by not watching? They manufacture stars, that may not be the preferred method for the IWC, but if 'we' the fans don't embrace a few when they deserve to be embraced (such as Roman Reigns right NOW), we will literally be stuck with Big Show and Kane main eventing PPVS forever. We cry out for new stars and subsequently reject them no matter how much they prove themselves. I obviously can't agree with him, but at least the guy I've quoted here actually admits it as simply being his preferred opinion instead of tearing apart WWE Booking trying to justify it. I personally call it self induced torture. If you aren't liking people you're supposed to like in Wrestling, yet you insist on watching it weekly, WWE will basically torture you to death. |
|
|
|
Post by POOR-ly Cuyler on Nov 4, 2015 11:00:24 GMT -5
Seth. Ill never like the main guy they want me to like. Reigns, Cena, Rock, Hogan...Stone Cold and HHH are the exception I know this is a wild extravagant theory of very little likelihood and narrow possibility... But what if you just so happen to ironically take a liking someone who they (the WWE) want you to like? You do realise that what you've just said translates to "if somebody I like gets a main event push, I'll turn on them." I respect your opinion and appreciate the honesty buddy, but fans with this attitude is the only thing that prevents success in WWE. I've never watched Game of Thrones, shocking I know, but I know it's good, because all its fans spread the word about how good it is all the time. Jon Snow is up there with Yoda, to some people!.. It makes you want to check it out, and makes me feel like I'm missing out, too! Now imagine you're a casual WWE fan, or you've never even watched wrestling before, and you decide to indulge yourself by weighing up the opinions of hardcore fans. And those fans basically tell you that the product isn't worth watching, and give some long winded explanation about how 2 suits whom you've never heard of who work behind the scenes have a secret agenda to ruin the product in spite of the very people who watch it. Trying to tell you that the big tattooed dude who they've pushed on TV whom you just saw beat the baddie with his Superman punch actually 'sucks' and 'doesn't deserve' his job... Does that sound like a welcoming product that you're missing out on by not watching? They manufacture stars, that may not be the preferred method for the IWC, but if 'we' the fans don't embrace a few when they deserve to be embraced (such as Roman Reigns right NOW), we will literally be stuck with Big Show and Kane main eventing PPVS forever. We cry out for new stars and subsequently reject them no matter how much they prove themselves. I obviously can't agree with him, but at least the guy I've quoted here actually admits it as simply being his preferred opinion instead of tearing apart WWE Booking trying to justify it. I personally call it self induced torture. If you aren't liking people you're supposed to like in Wrestling, yet you insist on watching it weekly, WWE will basically torture you to death. I didnt say I turn on people I like when they get a big push. I said I dont like the biggest names of the time...i like midcarders and gimmicks. I watched from 97-02. Then picked back up after mania xxx. I like daniel bryan but he clearly isnt who they push. I dont like roman reigns. Its not some plot or hipster thing. Its personal preference. While guys like Rock and Stone cold were good on the mic, their gear and moves didnt excite me. Reigns gear, moves, and mic work dont impress me. Its not torture, I just ignore the parts I dont like. Nxt is great, but Reigns reminds me of Cena, Batista, Brock, Orton level of me not caring |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 19:34:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2015 13:07:02 GMT -5
It's About to go down!!!!   |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Nov 4, 2015 13:26:54 GMT -5
I'm rooting for a good, fun match between the two to put the irrational Roman hate to bed once and for all.
|
|
Supreme Cross
Superstar
Joined on: Jun 5, 2014 19:01:32 GMT -5
Posts: 571 
|
Post by Supreme Cross on Nov 4, 2015 15:58:52 GMT -5
does anyone think Ambrose will turn on Reigns soon?
|
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Nov 4, 2015 16:01:00 GMT -5
Seth retains after Dean costs Roman the title. I dont think he will specifically HELP Rollins....I just think he doesnt want Roman to be champ bc he wants it for himself. We get Shield 3 way in December.
|
|
Supreme Cross
Superstar
Joined on: Jun 5, 2014 19:01:32 GMT -5
Posts: 571
|
Post by Supreme Cross on Nov 4, 2015 16:03:38 GMT -5
Seth retains after Dean costs Roman the title. I dont think he will specifically HELP Rollins....I just think he doesnt want Roman to be champ bc he wants it for himself. We get Shield 3 way in December. change it to Wrestlemania and i would like it |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 19:34:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2015 16:20:26 GMT -5
I know this is a wild extravagant theory of very little likelihood and narrow possibility... But what if you just so happen to ironically take a liking someone who they (the WWE) want you to like? You do realise that what you've just said translates to "if somebody I like gets a main event push, I'll turn on them." I respect your opinion and appreciate the honesty buddy, but fans with this attitude is the only thing that prevents success in WWE. I've never watched Game of Thrones, shocking I know, but I know it's good, because all its fans spread the word about how good it is all the time. Jon Snow is up there with Yoda, to some people!.. It makes you want to check it out, and makes me feel like I'm missing out, too! Now imagine you're a casual WWE fan, or you've never even watched wrestling before, and you decide to indulge yourself by weighing up the opinions of hardcore fans. And those fans basically tell you that the product isn't worth watching, and give some long winded explanation about how 2 suits whom you've never heard of who work behind the scenes have a secret agenda to ruin the product in spite of the very people who watch it. Trying to tell you that the big tattooed dude who they've pushed on TV whom you just saw beat the baddie with his Superman punch actually 'sucks' and 'doesn't deserve' his job... Does that sound like a welcoming product that you're missing out on by not watching? They manufacture stars, that may not be the preferred method for the IWC, but if 'we' the fans don't embrace a few when they deserve to be embraced (such as Roman Reigns right NOW), we will literally be stuck with Big Show and Kane main eventing PPVS forever. We cry out for new stars and subsequently reject them no matter how much they prove themselves. I obviously can't agree with him, but at least the guy I've quoted here actually admits it as simply being his preferred opinion instead of tearing apart WWE Booking trying to justify it. I personally call it self induced torture. If you aren't liking people you're supposed to like in Wrestling, yet you insist on watching it weekly, WWE will basically torture you to death. I didnt say I turn on people I like when they get a big push. I said I dont like the biggest names of the time...i like midcarders and gimmicks. I watched from 97-02. Then picked back up after mania xxx. I like daniel bryan but he clearly isnt who they push. I dont like roman reigns. Its not some plot or hipster thing. Its personal preference. While guys like Rock and Stone cold were good on the mic, their gear and moves didnt excite me. Reigns gear, moves, and mic work dont impress me. Its not torture, I just ignore the parts I dont like. Nxt is great, but Reigns reminds me of Cena, Batista, Brock, Orton level of me not caring It's just the wording, "not liking people whom WWE want you to like", regardless of who's at the top and who's not, if WWE didn't want you to like them, they wouldn't be on TV in the first place, surely? That's the one thing nobody can fault about WWE, they put out a product that they do want us viewers to like... Usually in spite of the product/characters whom we actually like! I like following a good midcard feud myself, to be fair. But I'm just a bit of a hipster like that  |
|
|
|
Post by A-Rob on Nov 4, 2015 16:53:54 GMT -5
Seth "The Man" Rollins, he needs to get a strong win.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Nov 4, 2015 17:29:25 GMT -5
Seth retains after Dean costs Roman the title. I dont think he will specifically HELP Rollins....I just think he doesnt want Roman to be champ bc he wants it for himself. We get Shield 3 way in December. change it to Wrestlemania and i would like it As would I. Sadly, I dont think WWE is ready to see this as a main event match for the biggest show of the year. In addition, Ambrose is far from being a "credible" title challenger. He has had no momentum on tv and has either played fodder to Rollins this year or sidekick to Reigns. He needs an oppotunity to breakout, get established and get some momentum. |
|
|
|
Post by sitruC on Nov 4, 2015 17:54:57 GMT -5
I'd rather Ambrose cost Reigns the match with a mistake (like hitting him with a chair instead of Rollins while the ref is down) and then a triple threat ladder match at TLC or whatever cause Reigns wants him added and The Authority think it will test Seth.
But I'm prepared for whatever result and fully expect it to be a contender for match of the year. Two solid performers starting a new chapter in a hopeful long rivalry for the years.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheChamp420 on Nov 4, 2015 19:19:07 GMT -5
Rollins, I hope
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 19:34:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2015 20:36:04 GMT -5
All Ambrose turning on Reigns would achieve is wiping out all of the hard earned momentum Reigns has built going into this match. It won't happen. It's far too early for that. WWE see Ambrose as being far too valuable for his genuine face reaction right now, judging by his usual placement on TV.
The turn will happen one day, but not yet. That's what I think anyway.
Reigns wins. Sheamus cashes in immediately. A 3 way feud between Roman/Sheamus/Rollins ensues through to rumble. Rollins wins it back, before dropping it in a triple threat at WrestleMania to Reigns, also featuring Rumble winner Ambrose. Sheamus could go on to face The Undertaker or something. I'm calling this.
|
|
![Rated [R] NinJa Avatar](http://storage.proboards.com/530008/avatar/IDIYNeRTVZulhCPXFiqx.png)
