|
Post by sitruC on Nov 14, 2015 15:58:18 GMT -5
The only time I wanna see Cesaro and Flair is a Figure Four countered into a Swing. That sounds cool as hell.
|
|
|
Post by TheLastDude on Nov 14, 2015 17:44:35 GMT -5
Ric Flair is my favorite wrestler of all-time, and I love Cesaro. But Flair can't really cut promos anymore because of his alcoholism, so this wouldn't do either of them any favors. I really wish you weren't right...but you are.
|
|
|
Post by attitudesback on Nov 14, 2015 18:03:53 GMT -5
Maybe Cesaro is going to end up being 'the guy'. If only they wouldn't throw the opportunity away so early in the tournament on a Raw.
|
|
|
Post by johnnyb on Nov 15, 2015 3:36:33 GMT -5
Huge fan of Ric Flair through the end of his WCW run (though TBH, after 1999 his work got pretty erratic and he appeared to be drunk on more than one occasion). That said, I have zero interest in seeing him on TV as a regular performer in any role. He would not be a good fit next to Cesaro.
The real key, as many have said and will repeat ad nauseam, is to give Cesaro regular mic time, let his natural charisma shine, and give him plenty of time in the ring. Fans WILL get behind Cesaro if WWE gives us a chance to.
|
|
|
Post by tarver89 on Nov 15, 2015 7:45:47 GMT -5
Ric Flair is my favorite wrestler of all-time, and I love Cesaro. But Flair can't really cut promos anymore because of his alcoholism, so this wouldn't do either of them any favors. 3 days ago i went to a live event here in Italy for the WWE European tour and Flair cut a promo at the start of the show. Well, it was really hard to understand what he was saying because he was clearly maundering, not joking.
|
|
|
Post by MADNESS_NH_97 on Nov 16, 2015 8:15:14 GMT -5
I dunno bout that one. On one hand what could it hurt? One the other, is Flair really the right choice? IMO they should have kept Natalya with Cesaro. They become best friends and both benefit career wise from their allegiance. Tyson eventually returns and feels like the third wheel. Tyson/Cesaro feud is set. Nattie must decide between her husband and her best friend. Do we really want to risk that this(even thought it would have the potential to be a good storyline if done right) would just end up being as horrible as Lana/Rusev/Ziggler/Rea?
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Nov 16, 2015 10:51:35 GMT -5
I dunno bout that one. On one hand what could it hurt? One the other, is Flair really the right choice? IMO they should have kept Natalya with Cesaro. They become best friends and both benefit career wise from their allegiance. Tyson eventually returns and feels like the third wheel. Tyson/Cesaro feud is set. Nattie must decide between her husband and her best friend. Do we really want to risk that this(even thought it would have the potential to be a good storyline if done right) would just end up being as horrible as Lana/Rusev/Ziggler/Rea? Better than nothing I suppose.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 5, 2024 15:26:37 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2015 16:57:21 GMT -5
They should have paired with him Ziggler when he asked a year or so ago. Except... That was Ziggler. I'm all for the pairing of Flair and Cesaro! If not, put Cesaro in the authority! Anything to get him to the spot he belongs!
|
|
|
Post by "The Perfect Ten" Mizard on Nov 18, 2015 17:14:58 GMT -5
I think Flair should stay retired tbh. Leave the memories alone.
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Nov 18, 2015 18:02:03 GMT -5
They should have paired with him Ziggler when he asked a year or so ago. Except... That was Ziggler. What?
|
|