|
|
Post by TheWrestleGeek on Jan 25, 2016 23:05:13 GMT -5
I was just thinking about this earlier, and thought I would share. Ever since the Triple H & HBK Mania feuds that Taker had, everything has went a little down hill for him. I mean I'm just like the next guy, we all love seeing Taker at Mania. But it's kinda turning into a sad boxing match, where the opponent tries his best to make Taker look good. Last year's Mania was probably Taker's best one within the last 3 years. So since this is most likely his last Mania, and he has nothing to prove to us, I have a idea to sale him off "strong". The streak is over, so technically the Mania match doesn't need to be a single competitors match, there isn't anything to prove there. So why not have Taker in a tag match. I liked what WWE was doing with the Brothers of Destruction a while back. It kinda even made Kane worth watching again, which is kinda hard with his latest sucky gimmicks. I think since Sting most likely is done, and the Streak is over, then a tag match w/ Kane would help get Taker out for retirement in a "strong" view. I think it would be more entertaining, than another almost impossible to watch singles match. That's just my opinion. Tonight on RAW I noticed that a remaking of the Brothers of Destruction vs. Wyatts feud was kinda hinted, with the attack on Kane after Kane and Bray's match. What's your alls thoughts?
|
|
Daniel F'n Bryan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 16, 2014 14:37:32 GMT -5
Posts: 3,349
|
Post by Daniel F'n Bryan on Jan 25, 2016 23:13:48 GMT -5
We saw Wyatts vs BOD. Not again. please
|
|
|
|
Post by TheWrestleGeek on Jan 25, 2016 23:15:06 GMT -5
We saw Wyatts vs BOD. Not again. please I don't think I would want to see it again either, but if they go this route, which has been brought up in the past, is there really anyone else for them to face? |
|
Daniel F'n Bryan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 16, 2014 14:37:32 GMT -5
Posts: 3,349
|
Post by Daniel F'n Bryan on Jan 25, 2016 23:17:11 GMT -5
We saw Wyatts vs BOD. Not again. please I don't I think I would want to see it again either, but if they go this route, which has been brought up in the past, is there really anyone else for them to face? Id rather see another Taker vs Kane match. Perfect match to retire both men |
|
|
|
Post by TheWrestleGeek on Jan 25, 2016 23:20:05 GMT -5
I don't I think I would want to see it again either, but if they go this route, which has been brought up in the past, is there really anyone else for them to face? Id rather see another Taker vs Kane match. Perfect match to retire both men I would have to be really really sold on that match, if they did that. Now, if Kane was 1999 Kane, then I would be all about it. |
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jan 25, 2016 23:23:46 GMT -5
I was thinking during RAW they should go with Taker & Kane vs the League of Nations. Whether it be two on two or two on four, either work.
I think Taker & Kane should retire together. It's time.
|
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jan 25, 2016 23:28:00 GMT -5
If Sheamus had a shred of credibility, he'd be a decent option. But he doesn't, and neither do his counterparts.
Owens is very clearly the best option at this point. If Zayn was a one off, that's the way to go. If they're gonna do Owens/Zayn, I guess I gravitate toward Jericho?
|
|
|
|
Post by Todd Pettengill on Jan 25, 2016 23:41:29 GMT -5
WWE VS WCW
One Last Time!
Brothers of Destruction vs Kronik
|
|
|
|
Post by Darkhawk on Jan 26, 2016 2:18:33 GMT -5
I don't care what anybody says the only man worthy of facing Undertaker this year at Wrestlemania is Sting.
|
|
bab2781
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Mar 11, 2015 13:07:36 GMT -5
Posts: 139 
|
Post by bab2781 on Jan 26, 2016 2:22:53 GMT -5
I'll say it again Undertaker should've faced Sting last year at WrestleMania. Making that his last match.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Jan 26, 2016 2:38:35 GMT -5
I still don't get the obsession with Taker vs Sting. I personally don't think it would be that good.
|
|
Butchers
Superstar
Joined on: Jun 26, 2002 5:00:08 GMT -5
Posts: 774
|
Post by Butchers on Jan 26, 2016 3:10:15 GMT -5
I get the horrible feeling we might be on for a Taker,Kane, Brock and Big Show vs The Wyatts 8 man.
|
|
|
|
Post by tarver89 on Jan 26, 2016 4:19:12 GMT -5
What about Taker staying at home?
|
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jan 26, 2016 10:35:29 GMT -5
I don't understand the fascination with getting Kane into a match with Taker, be it a tag or otherwise. Kane drags Taker down at this point. You're talking about a guy who hasn't been taken seriously in at least five years, who was just eliminated from the Rumble cleanly by Braun Strowman, and beaten by Bray Wyatt with relative ease last night. Kane just does not have any mystique anymore.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 15:30:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2016 10:38:40 GMT -5
WWE VS WCW One Last Time! Brothers of Destruction vs Kronik You gonna dig Adams up? I see Sheamus now, which would be decent. |
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Jan 26, 2016 11:13:36 GMT -5
WWE VS WCW One Last Time! Brothers of Destruction vs Kronik TWO DEAD MEN IN ONE MATCH MAGGLE!!! |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 15:30:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2016 11:24:30 GMT -5
I think Sting is the only logical choice now that Cena is injured. They've always been compared to each other, they've never face before, Mania is in Texas, and it seems like this'll be 'Taker's last match.
|
|
|
|
Post by BoJack Hogan on Jan 26, 2016 11:38:19 GMT -5
Zzzzzzzz
|
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Jan 26, 2016 11:44:12 GMT -5
I think Sting is the only logical choice now that Cena is injured. They've always been compared to each other, they've never face before, Mania is in Texas, and it seems like this'll be 'Taker's last match. Sting can't wrestle anymore. He needs neck surgery. Plus, he's going to be 57 years old by WrestleMania. WWE missed the boat on Sting vs. Undertaker. It should have happened LAST YEAR. Instead, they wasted Sting on a match with Triple H that really didn't need to happen, and they used Undertaker in a random match against Bray Wyatt that didn't need to happen either. Plus, since Sting thought WM31 was his one and ONLY match in WWE and was cool with losing no matter who it was against, that's even MORE of a reason why Sting and Undertaker should have wrestled LAST YEAR. It just wasn't meant to be....and now with the neck injury to Sting; WWE is NEVER going to clear him to wrestle again, and really, it's not safe for him at this point. I don't want to see Sting end up in a wheelchair. |
|
|
|
Post by Kanenite on Jan 26, 2016 12:32:57 GMT -5
They should of saved Kane and Taker against the Wyatt's for Wrestlemania and made it 2 on 4 with the BOD winning.
I missed most of RAW last night because it was one of my best friend's Birthdays, but it seems like they are hinting towards Kane/Show vs. some combination of Harper/Rowan/Strowman which sounds awful.
|
|
