|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Jan 26, 2016 12:50:40 GMT -5
I was thinking Lesnar and Taker vs Bray and Braun
Or Lesnar, Taker, Kane, and Ryback vs Bray Braun Harper and Rowan
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 13:31:36 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2016 12:58:38 GMT -5
I think he should watch the show on his couch.
|
|
|
|
Post by Todd Pettengill on Jan 26, 2016 17:42:01 GMT -5
WWE VS WCW One Last Time! Brothers of Destruction vs Kronik You gonna dig Adams up? I see Sheamus now, which would be decent. They can't dig him up when they dig Taker up? |
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Jan 26, 2016 18:01:09 GMT -5
what they should have done: sting vs taker last year. halfway through the match undertaker's former wm opponents come out, all to get taken down with some help from kane. then the nwo comes out, only to be taken down with help from flair. finally the two men fight again, until sting hits taker with a final stinger's splash and both men collapse for the 10 count.
oh yeah, and have jim ross commentate it.
|
|
johnnyaustin21
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 21, 2011 14:16:20 GMT -5
Posts: 1,609
|
Post by johnnyaustin21 on Jan 26, 2016 18:23:25 GMT -5
Gut feel is that he'll be in a tag team match up teaming with Brock Lesnar going up against The Wyatt Family.Not a match I care to see but logically makes the most sense with Taker's last few matches and feuds being with Brock and Wyatt.But if I could choose I would go with AJ Styles or calling up Finn Balor.Those two I think could carry Taker to a great match up and with his old and loss of in ring speed these two could bunch around the ring and sell like crazy and make him look like a milion bucks.Think along the lines of his match with Punk at WM 29 but better in terms of the in ring quality sense both AJ and Balor are better all around in ring works then CM Punk.
|
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Jan 26, 2016 19:21:30 GMT -5
I don't understand the fascination with getting Kane into a match with Taker, be it a tag or otherwise. Kane drags Taker down at this point. You're talking about a guy who hasn't been taken seriously in at least five years, who was just eliminated from the Rumble cleanly by Braun Strowman, and beaten by Bray Wyatt with relative ease last night. Kane just does not have any mystique anymore. The same can be said about The Undertaker. He hasn't had any mystique since 2009. 2010 was his 20th anniversary and it was a God awful year for him and then once he became part time it was the final nail. Over the last few years he lost everything that was great about him. He went from being a deadman who tormented and stole souls to a WM money draw who defended his streak which ended up getting broken.
Also last year he was made to look like a sore loser when he attacked Brock so to be honest it's unfair to victimize Kane and pretend the Undertakers is perfect. If WM wasn't so desperate for star power I would rather Taker miss it because since the streak is gone he serves no purpose at the event anymore.
|
|
kimberlasskick
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 9, 2006 21:28:04 GMT -5
Posts: 1,425
|
Post by kimberlasskick on Jan 26, 2016 20:33:29 GMT -5
if the wyatts manhandled undertaker and kane at survivor series, Lesnar and Taker vs The Wyatts would have made sense now. But they easily beat them so it's kinda pointless.
|
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jan 26, 2016 21:16:15 GMT -5
I don't understand the fascination with getting Kane into a match with Taker, be it a tag or otherwise. Kane drags Taker down at this point. You're talking about a guy who hasn't been taken seriously in at least five years, who was just eliminated from the Rumble cleanly by Braun Strowman, and beaten by Bray Wyatt with relative ease last night. Kane just does not have any mystique anymore. The same can be said about The Undertaker. He hasn't had any mystique since 2009. 2010 was his 20th anniversary and it was a God awful year for him and then once he became part time it was the final nail. Over the last few years he lost everything that was great about him. He went from being a deadman who tormented and stole souls to a WM money draw who defended his streak which ended up getting broken.
Also last year he was made to look like a sore loser when he attacked Brock so to be honest it's unfair to victimize Kane and pretend the Undertakers is perfect. If WM wasn't so desperate for star power I would rather Taker miss it because since the streak is gone he serves no purpose at the event anymore.
While I certainly agree that Taker is nowhere near as prominent or meaningful as he once was, I certainly don't believe he is on an equal playing field with Kane. For starters, Kane has been turned and overexposed more than just about anyone on the roster, save perhaps Big Show. Additionally, The Undertaker has always been presented as a serious character who was a legitimate threat to anyone he stepped in the ring with. The same cannot be said for Kane. |
|
|
|
Post by ~ Cymru ~ on Jan 26, 2016 22:04:14 GMT -5
IF anything I wouldn't mind seeing Kane vs Taker again, Undertaker didnt come out to help Kane against the Wyatts like Kane helped him, ID rather Wyatts go on to face Lesnar while Kane calls out the Undertaker for not being there.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 13:31:36 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2016 22:10:39 GMT -5
I don't care what anybody says the only man worthy of facing Undertaker this year at Wrestlemania is Sting. Lol why? Sting was never a viable option for anything, yet somehow the wrestling Universe has made him out to be some deserving legend. Never understood it. Lesnar should be facing the Wyatts. Taker and Kane should go again before they're both done. Give me my HIAC dammit. |
|
|
|
Post by cableV on Jan 26, 2016 22:33:08 GMT -5
Undertaker should do his entrance..grab the mic..say 'it's time from me to rest in peace'..then leave.
Just like WWE screwed up by not doing Hogan vs Flair at WM8(I think), they screwed up by not doing Sting vs Taker last year. I didn't want to see Undertaker vs. Cena, but I imagine whatever they do in it's place, I will want to see less.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 13:31:36 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2016 5:28:36 GMT -5
I think Sting is the only logical choice now that Cena is injured. They've always been compared to each other, they've never face before, Mania is in Texas, and it seems like this'll be 'Taker's last match. Sting can't wrestle anymore. He needs neck surgery. Plus, he's going to be 57 years old by WrestleMania. WWE missed the boat on Sting vs. Undertaker. It should have happened LAST YEAR. Instead, they wasted Sting on a match with Triple H that really didn't need to happen, and they used Undertaker in a random match against Bray Wyatt that didn't need to happen either. Plus, since Sting thought WM31 was his one and ONLY match in WWE and was cool with losing no matter who it was against, that's even MORE of a reason why Sting and Undertaker should have wrestled LAST YEAR. It just wasn't meant to be....and now with the neck injury to Sting; WWE is NEVER going to clear him to wrestle again, and really, it's not safe for him at this point. I don't want to see Sting end up in a wheelchair. You make A LOT of very STRONG predictions, I hope STING does stay hurt so it DOESNT make those comments look SILLY. It's easy to look at last year in retrospect and say "I didn't like that, they should have done this." Sting Vs Undertaker at WM31 would have been twice as pointless as both of the matches they ended up having. "Here's the guy who's never wrestled here before, and here's the guy who hasn't been seen since he got battered at WM30." The build up would have been based solely around video packages, and the match may have even sucked. Not to mention on a show which was so heavily youth influenced, it would have felt like a pensioners showcase instead of the epic clash it should have been. Throw in the HOF induction for Sting, and the very real possibility of Undertakers Texas WrestleMania being his last, the match was always destined to happen at WrestleMania 32. It's just a case of both guys being fit and ready, we know Taker is, it just depends on whether Sting can carry a match without aggrevating his injury any further. He may be 57, but this is the same neck injury which Cena recovered from in a matter of months, it's not as IMPOSSIBLE as you MADE it OUT to SOUND in YOUR post. Then again, I could be wrong, and Sting may be perminantly broken forever. Sting talk aside, I would prefer to see The Undertaker come to the aid of Brock Lesnar to fend off The Wyatt Family out of mutual respect, leading to a Taker/Brock Vs Wyatts clash at Mania. A great way to tie in the last 2 Manias with this one. Imagine Takers last hurrah at Mania he stands alongside the man who ended the streak, almost like a passing of the torch. A WrestleMania moment that would be. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 13:31:36 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2016 5:46:15 GMT -5
I don't care what anybody says the only man worthy of facing Undertaker this year at Wrestlemania is Sting. Lol why? Sting was never a viable option for anything, yet somehow the wrestling Universe has made him out to be some deserving legend. Never understood it. . How do comments like these get made by kids in the era of the WWE Network..? Or do children these days not get the same joy as we once did out of watching the stars of times gone by? We had to chase tapes, they have it ON DEMAND, and still, THIS is what they come out with? Saying that, there was something about the chase that gave added credibility to those long sought-after tapes of WCW Saturday Night. Maybe Sting isn't a legend after all. Is somebody gunna tell him that the Taker Kane HIAC already happened, 6 years ago, and it sucked meteorically? |
|
|
|
Post by Gone. on Jan 27, 2016 10:59:55 GMT -5
Taker/Brock vs Wyatt's.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 13:31:36 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2016 14:20:06 GMT -5
Lol why? Sting was never a viable option for anything, yet somehow the wrestling Universe has made him out to be some deserving legend. Never understood it. . How do comments like these get made by kids in the era of the WWE Network..? Or do children these days not get the same joy as we once did out of watching the stars of times gone by? We had to chase tapes, they have it ON DEMAND, and still, THIS is what they come out with? Saying that, there was something about the chase that gave added credibility to those long sought-after tapes of WCW Saturday Night. Maybe Sting isn't a legend after all. Is somebody gunna tell him that the Taker Kane HIAC already happened, 6 years ago, and it sucked meteorically? Being condescending doesn't work when you're wrong. I grew up having to watch Sting. Never enjoyed his presence. Then he came out dressed like the Crow. It was super lame. THEN decided he was the Joker some 20 years later? I'm aware kids thought he was the epitome of cool, wearing all black, and having his face painted, but he always came across as incredibly lame to me, with nothing earth shattering to back it up with in the ring. And no, I did not know it actually happened, as I've rarely watched for the last 10 years. But thank you, I shall go and find it  |
|
|
|
Post by kazoosandstreamers on Jan 27, 2016 14:33:46 GMT -5
In a perfect world this would be the year he retires in Texas against Sting.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 13:31:36 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2016 15:51:49 GMT -5
How do comments like these get made by kids in the era of the WWE Network..? Or do children these days not get the same joy as we once did out of watching the stars of times gone by? We had to chase tapes, they have it ON DEMAND, and still, THIS is what they come out with? Saying that, there was something about the chase that gave added credibility to those long sought-after tapes of WCW Saturday Night. Maybe Sting isn't a legend after all. Is somebody gunna tell him that the Taker Kane HIAC already happened, 6 years ago, and it sucked meteorically? Being condescending doesn't work when you're wrong. I grew up having to watch Sting. Never enjoyed his presence. Then he came out dressed like the Crow. It was super lame. THEN decided he was the Joker some 20 years later? I'm aware kids thought he was the epitome of cool, wearing all black, and having his face painted, but he always came across as incredibly lame to me, with nothing earth shattering to back it up with in the ring. And no, I did not know it actually happened, as I've rarely watched for the last 10 years. But thank you, I shall go and find it Being a troll doesn't work when you're wrong either. How are the majority of long term wrestling fans "wrong" for liking someone who you, a minority, don't? I'm not implying you're wrong for not liking Sting, I pity your torturous upbringing in that case (and also question your ability to be stimulated by wrestling in general). Where you went wrong, as most obvious trolls do, is when you began spouting your dislike for Sting as if it was factual. Barely anybody agrees with any of your disrespectful comments about him, you know that and that's the only reason you're on this board in the first place. Pack it in lad. Oh you never saw the HIAC? It's funny how if you were watching at the time, you'd have probably been trolling this board about how crap it was. |
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Jan 27, 2016 20:04:25 GMT -5
There's really nobody on the roster who I'd be interested in seeing him face other than Owens, and it looks like he'll be feuding with AJ if their Rumble confrontation was any indication of how things will go. But I think they'll wind up having Taker face either Rusev or Sheamus just for the simple fact that they have no idea what to do with either guy, and they need to have Taker wrestle if they want to have any chance of selling 100,000 seats.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 13:31:36 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2016 20:05:07 GMT -5
Being condescending doesn't work when you're wrong. I grew up having to watch Sting. Never enjoyed his presence. Then he came out dressed like the Crow. It was super lame. THEN decided he was the Joker some 20 years later? I'm aware kids thought he was the epitome of cool, wearing all black, and having his face painted, but he always came across as incredibly lame to me, with nothing earth shattering to back it up with in the ring. And no, I did not know it actually happened, as I've rarely watched for the last 10 years. But thank you, I shall go and find it Being a troll doesn't work when you're wrong either. How are the majority of long term wrestling fans "wrong" for liking someone who you, a minority, don't? I'm not implying you're wrong for not liking Sting, I pity your torturous upbringing in that case (and also question your ability to be stimulated by wrestling in general). Where you went wrong, as most obvious trolls do, is when you began spouting your dislike for Sting as if it was factual. Barely anybody agrees with any of your disrespectful comments about him, you know that and that's the only reason you're on this board in the first place. Pack it in lad. Oh you never saw the HIAC? It's funny how if you were watching at the time, you'd have probably been trolling this board about how crap it was. Contrary to the impression I've apparently made on you, I'm actually not always negative. But there are things I don't like. And two of them, believe it or not, are Sting and Kevin Owens. I love wrestling. Always have. I wish it would still entertain me in the way that it use to. But, what is wrong with my upbringing solely because I'm not a Sting fan? I'm sure he was a hero to alot of kids, and that's great. I loved the Crow, and thought it was silly that a popular wrestler could so easily take that look from something else. And as I mentioned, he did it again with the Joker. I don't like the guy. He doesn't entertain me. I don't see how that's disrespectful. And Kevin Owens, to me, is laughable. It's great that so many people like him. He must be doing something speaks to your interest. I personally cannot stand him. Based off of the people I know, whom his personality reminds me of, on top of the ridiculous hype I see about the guy everywhere, has forever soured him for me. His "hardcore" matches are a joke. Which more is a testament to the direction of the company instead of him. Having watched guys like Foley, and have this dude attempt to replicate that feebly, is not entertaining to me. But more power to you. Since it's only fair to throw my own interests out there, I think Wyatt is awesome. He's one of about 3 reasons I actually tune in. The guy is a classical "wrestler" and is doing things the way they've always been done, and is working. His gimmick is original, and you can tell he believes in it. That, I respect. I'm aware millions of people are uninterested in the guy, and that does not affect me whatsoever. Nor should it affect you that I detest Owens and Sting. See? |
|
|
|
Post by UltimateCollector78 on Jan 28, 2016 3:51:57 GMT -5
Here is my suggestion for Undertaker at WM32:
How about a 3 way with Roman and HHH for the title at WM32. He can announce that it is his last showing before hand and wants to go out on top as WWE champ in the main event of WM.
taker can pin HHH to win the title and after shakes Romans hand as an endorsment that Roman is the future. This way we avoid a Roman title win that the crowd will have none of. This also gives taker 2 guys to carry him a bit as opposed to a singles match.
Undertaker poses with the title in his tradional phenom way, after a few minutes of that the locker room including big names like Rock, Brock, HBK, Cena, HHH, Flair,…. all stand outside the ring clapping. NO ONE goes in the ring.
Undertaker takes it all in, than lays the title in the middle of the ring. GONG is heard, lights go out and when they come back on taker is gone and the title is the only thing left in the middle of the ring. We do not see taker again until his HOF induction speech., whenever that is.
|
|
